热带海洋学报 ›› 2010, Vol. 29 ›› Issue (3): 103-107.doi: 10.11978/j.issn.1009-5470.2010.03.103cstr: 32234.14.j.issn.1009-5470.2010.03.103

• 海洋生物学 • 上一篇    下一篇

不同人工鱼礁模型对花尾胡椒鲷的诱集效应

周艳波1,2, 蔡文贵1, 陈海刚1, 陈丕茂1, 吕国敏1, 贾晓平1   

  1. 1.中国水产科学研究院南海水产研究所, 广东省渔业生态环境重点实验室, 农业部南海渔业资源环境重点野外科学观测试验站, 广东 广州 510300; 2. 上海海洋大学海洋科学学院, 上海210306
  • 收稿日期:2009-09-02 修回日期:2009-11-11 出版日期:2010-07-01 发布日期:2010-05-24
  • 通讯作者: 贾晓平
  • 作者简介:周艳波(1983—), 男, 河南省周口市人, 硕士研究生, 研究方向为渔业环境及其调控。E-mail: zhouyanbo0804@126.com
  • 基金资助:

    国家“863”计划项目(2006AA100303); 中央级公益性科研院所基本科研业务费专项资金项目(2007ZD03, 2009TS19)

Attraction effect of various artificial reef models on Plectorhynchus cinctus

ZHOU Yan-bo1,2, CAI Wen-gui1, CHEN Hai-gang1, CHEN Pi-mao1, LÜ Guo-min1, JIA Xiao-ping1   

  1. 1. South China Sea Fisheries Research Institute, CAFS; Key Laboratory of Fishery Ecology Environment, Guangdong Province of China; Key Field Scientific Experimental Station of South China Sea Fishery Resource and Environment, Ministry of Agriculture, Guangzhou 510300, China; 2. College of Marine Sciences, Shanghai Ocean University, Shanghai 201306, China
  • Received:2009-09-02 Revised:2009-11-11 Online:2010-07-01 Published:2010-05-24
  • Contact: 贾晓平
  • About author:周艳波(1983—), 男, 河南省周口市人, 硕士研究生, 研究方向为渔业环境及其调控。E-mail: zhouyanbo0804@126.com
  • Supported by:

    国家“863”计划项目(2006AA100303); 中央级公益性科研院所基本科研业务费专项资金项目(2007ZD03, 2009TS19)

摘要:

为了解不同类型人工鱼礁的集鱼效果, 在试验水槽内观察5种鱼礁模型对花尾胡椒鲷Plectorhynchus cinctus的诱集效果。结果表明: 在未投放礁体模型时, 试验鱼的密集区均出现在水槽的左端(A1和A6区), 出现率为61.60%, 而试验鱼在空白礁区(A3和A8区)的平均出现率低于5%; 在A3和A8区中间放入鱼礁模型后, 鱼礁区(即A3和A8区)试验鱼的出现率分别上升至32.53%(B礁)、37.60%(C礁)、20.93%(D礁)、28.13%(E礁)、29.20%(F礁), 而原密集区A1和A6试验鱼的平均出现率分别下降至29.47%(B礁)、23.47%(C礁)、33.60%(D礁)、25.73%(E礁)、42.93%(F礁)。统计数据显示, 5种礁体模型放入后, 礁区内试验鱼的平均出现率与投放前相比均大幅度提高, 说明5种模型礁对试验鱼均有较强的诱集效果, 其中有效空间较大, 遮盖效果较好的C礁的诱集效果最好。

关键词: 鱼礁模型, 花尾胡椒鲷, 集鱼效果

Abstract:

Few studies have been conducted on the attraction effect of artificial reef on fish in China. In this study, five different artificial reef models were put into an experimental trough to observe behavioral responses of fish Plectorhynchus cinctus. The results showed that without artificial reef models in the trough, Plectorhynchus cinctus preferred to stay in the left-edge areas (Areas A1 and A6) of the trough. The average occurring rate of fish in Areas A1 and A6 was about 61.60%, while the average occurring rate of fish inside the no-reef areas (Areas A3 and A8) was less than 5%. After the artificial models were put into the middle of Areas A3 and A8 of trough, average occurring rates of fish inside the reef areas (Areas A3 and A8) increased to 32.53% (Model B), 37.60% (Model C), 20.93% (Model D), 28.13% (Model E) and 29.20% (Model F), while those in the left-edge areas (Areas A1 and A6) of the trough reduced to 29.47% (Model B), 23.47% (Model C), 33.60% (Model D), 25.73% (Model E) and 42.93% (Model F). The results showed that all of five artificial reef models had obvious attraction effects on Plectorhynchus cinctus, and Model C had the best attraction effects due to its large available room and shade space.

Key words: artificial reef model, Plectorhynchus cinctus, attraction effect