前人研究表明，粤东海盆、南沙地块东部、加里曼丹西部存在晚三叠—早侏罗世海相地层, 并且沉积相和古生物的对比认为它们在晚三叠—早侏罗世可能属同一海盆。文章对广东梅县、惠州和东莞的下侏罗统进行了古地磁研究, 试图从古地磁的角度探讨粤东海盆、南沙地块东部、加里曼丹西部是否同属一个海盆。本文退磁结果表明，梅县玄武岩样品分离出低温剩磁和高温特征剩磁; 惠州样品只有少数能分离出低温剩磁，难以统计方向；东莞红层样品分离出低温剩磁、中温剩磁和高温特征剩磁。梅县和东莞低温剩磁方向与当地现代地磁场方向一致,为现代地磁场的重磁化结果。所有采点中，只有2个采点分离出了高温特征剩磁, 难以用褶皱检验方法检验高温特征剩磁是否原生剩磁。若用华南地块早侏罗世、中—晚侏罗世和白垩纪参考极限定东莞和梅县磁倾角大小, 对比东莞中温剩磁、高温特征剩磁和梅县高温特征剩磁褶皱展平0—100%的倾角范围, 讨论各剩磁在褶皱展平的形成阶段, 结果为东莞中温剩磁在褶皱展平70%—80%时获得; 东莞高温特征剩磁可能在褶皱展平后获得; 但无法确定梅县高温特征剩磁最可能在哪个褶皱展平阶段获得。磁组构揭示了东莞红层沉积和压实特征, 增加了东莞高温特征剩磁为原生剩磁的可能性。等温剩磁曲线、热退磁曲线和交变退磁曲线表明, 东莞红层的携磁矿物为赤铁矿; 梅县玄武岩部分样品携磁矿物为磁铁矿, 部分样品携磁矿物为赤铁矿。文章的古地磁结果虽然未能回答“粤东海盆、南沙地块东部、加里曼丹西部是否同属一个海盆”的科学问题，但为今后进一步的古地磁工作提供了有用信息。
Previous study has showed that Late Triassic and Early Jurassic marine sediments exist in the northern margin of the South China Sea (SCS), the eastern part of Nansha Block and the western part of the Kalimantan Islands. Similarities of lithofacies and fossil types between these areas indicate that they probably belonged to a unified basin in the Late Triassic and Early Jurassic. To test this hypothesis, paleomagnetic data are required from these three crustal blocks, and here we report Early Jurassic paleomagnetic data from the northern margin of the SCS. Seven sites (98 samples) of volcaniclastic sediments and basalts were collected from Meixian; two sites (48 samples) of siltstones were collected from Huizhou and Dongguan. Single, recent overprint component was found in the volcaniclastic sediments from Meixian. Low temperature component (LTC) and high temperature component (HTC) can be isolated from basalts in Meixian. LTC, intermediate temperature component (ITC) and HTC can be isolated from siltstones in Dongguan. The LTC directions from Meixian and Dongguan are distributed near the present geomagnetic field, indicating that they are recent viscous remanence. HTCs can be isolated from these two sites. However, it is hard to know whether the HTCs are primary components because fold tests are not available. If reference poles of Early Jurassic, Mid-Late Jurassic and Cretaceous from the South China Block (SCB) were used to confine the magnetic inclination of Meixian and Dongguan, we could estimate which phase the components were formed in during 0?100% unfolding of the strata by comparing the confined inclination to the magnetic inclination during unfolding. With this method, we conclude that the ITC of Dongguan was formed when the strata was unfold by 70%?80% and HTC of Dongguan was probably formed before the folding, but we cannot determine when the HTC of Meixian was formed because the range of magnetic inclination during unfolding is wide. Results of anisotropy of magnetic susceptibility (AMS) are consistent with lava flow fabrics, sediment deposition and compaction fabrics. Curves of isothemal remanent magnetism (IRM), thermal demagnetization and alternative field demagnetization indicate that the main magnetic mineral of red beds from Dongguan is hematite and that the main magnetic mineral of some specimen from Meixian is magnetite while the main magnetic mineral of other specimen from Meixian is hematite. Though our result can’t answer the question that whether the northern margin of SCS, the eastern part of Nansha Block and the western part of the Kalimantan Islands belonged to the same basin in the Late Triassic and Early Jurassic due to the limited paleomagnetic data, it is still important to report the result to provide information for further paleomagnetic research of those areas.
[1] KLEMME H D, ULMISHEK G F. Effective petroleum source rocks of the world: Stratigraphic distribution and controlling depositional factors[J]. AAPG Bulletin, 1991, 75: 1809-1851.
[2] 广东省地质矿产局．广东省区域地质志[M]．北京:地质出版社, 1988: 767–768.
[3] 郝沪军, 林鹤鸣, 杨梦雄, 等. 潮汕坳陷中生界——油气勘探的新领域[J]. 中国海上油气. 地质, 2001, (03): 157-163.
[4] 郝沪军, 汪瑞良, 张向涛, 等. 珠江口盆地东部海相中生界识别及分布[J]. 中国海上油气, 2004, (02): 84-88.
[5] 夏戡原, 黄慈流. 南海中生代特提期沉积盆地的发现与找寻中生代含油气盆地的前景[J]. 地学前缘, 2000, 7(3): 227-238.
[6] HUTCHISON C S. Geological evolution of south-east Asia [M]. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1989: 355.
[7] TATE R B. Cross-border correlation of geological formation in Sarawak and Kalimantan [J]. Geol Soc Malaysia, 1991, 28: 63-95.
[8] 陈金华, 徐克定, 徐柔远. 中国南方三叠纪和侏罗纪的生物地理区系问题[J]. 古生物学报, 1998, 37(1): 97-107.
[9] 周蒂, 陈汉宗, 孙珍, 等. 南海及其围区中生代岩相古地理及有关大地构造和资源问题[G]//李家彪, 高抒. 中国边缘海海盆演化与资源效应, 北京:海洋出版社, 2004: 65-76.
[10] ZHOU D, SUN Z, CHEN H Z, et al. Mesozoic paleogeography and tectonic evolution of South China Sea and adjacent areas in the context of Tethyan and Paleo-Pacific interconnections [J]. Island Arc, 2008, 17: 186-207.
[11] KIRSCHVINK J L. The least-squares line and plane and the analysis of paleomagnetic data [J]. Geophys J R Astron Soc, 1980, 62: 699-718.
[12] FISHER R A. Dispersion on a sphere [J]. Proc R Soc (London) A, 1953, 217: 295-305.
[13] 任纪舜. 论中国南部的大地构造[J]. 地质学报, 1994, (4): 275-287.
[14] 白立新, 朱日祥. 扬子地块古生代大地构造演化及古地磁学研究综述[J]. 地球物理学报进展, 1996, 11(3): 109-116.
[15] 吴浩若. 重新解释广西运动[J]. 科学通报, 2000, 45(5): 555-558.
[16] TAN X D, KODAMA K P, WANG P Y, et al. Paleomagnetism of early Triassic limestones from the Huanan Block, south China: No evidence for separation between the Huanan and Yangtze Blocks during the early Mesozoic[J]. Geophys J Int, 2000, 142(1): 241-256.
[17] 沈忠悦, 丁敬海, 叶长贺等. 广东黄坌早三叠世古地磁结果及其构造地质意义[J]. 科学通报, 2006, 51(14): 1689-1695.
[18] 吴汉宁, 朱日祥, 白立新, 等. 扬子地块显生宙古地磁视极移曲线及地块运动特征[J]. 中国科学: D辑, 1998, 28: 69-78.
[19] ZHU Z M, MORINAGA H, GUI R J. Paleomagnetic constraints on the extent of the stable body of the South China Block since the Cretaceous: New data from the Yuanma Basin, China[J]. Earth and Planetary Science Letters, 2006. 248(1/2): 533-544.
