以WRF(weather research forecasting)模式模拟了登陆后再入海0713号台风韦帕, 同时考虑了中纬度过程不变与过程时变的各类SST海温场对模拟效果的作用。试验中重点分析热力影响因子[即模式的两种微物理方案LIN(Purdue Lin scheme)、WSM6(WRF single-moment 6-class scheme)]以及动力影响因子(即模式的台风BOGUS模型)对各类SST海温场的反应。分别并综合研究了热力、动力、及海温因子对再入海台风的路径及强度模拟所产生的影响。多项成组试验显示, 台风过程时变的SST场的使用能够更好地诊断和模拟台风区海气相互作用并改善对再入海台风路径与强度的预测。对0713号台风模拟而言, 微物理过程WSM6方案给出的结果(包括路径、气压、风力、以及感热和潜热等要素)比LIN方案更好。采用BOGUS模型对再入海台风的路径模拟有较明显改善。在台风再入海阶段, 模拟的海气界面感热通量与潜热通量分布显示, 正的感热通量高值区为台风生存提供能量, 并对台风移动有较好的指示性; 台风潜热通量高值区位于台风风力辐合增强区, 此处潜热高值区与台风结构配合, 对入海台风活动的持续有正贡献。而过程时变的SST场的使用对台风预测是有利的, 其中6h时变的SST较日平均SST效果更显著。
We simulate the return to the sea of Typhoon Wipha (No.0713) using the weather research forecasting (WRF) model, by considering influences of different sea surface temperature (SST) fields that change or unchange with time during typhoon lifetime. We emphasize the responses to the SST fields, of thermodynamic factors, which are two microphysics schemes of LIN (Purdue Lin scheme) and WSM6 (WRF single-moment 6-class scheme) in the model, and of dynamic factor, which is Typhoon BOGUS scheme in the model. Furthermore, we investigate the impacts from thermodynamic factors, dynamic factors, and SST fields respectively and the combined impacts of the factors on the simulated typhoon track and intensity. The results from a set of experiments show that when SST changes with time we can obtain better diagnosis and simulation of air-sea interaction in typhoon area, and improve the prediction of typhoon’s track and intensity. For the simulation of Typhoon Wipha, the WSM6 scheme is more suitable than the LIN scheme, according to a number of model output variables, including typhoon track, central air pressure, the biggest wind speed, sensible heat flux and latent heat flux, at the stages of landfall and return to the sea. The Typhoon BOGUS scheme gives an obvious improvement on typhoon track simulation. During the stage of typhoon return to the sea, the simulated sensible heat flux and latent heat flux distributions show that the positive high value areas of sensible heat flux provide energy to typhoon and indicate its future track in advance. The high value area of latent heat flux is located at the typhoon wind convergence and strengthening area. The high latent heat flux in the typhoon system structure contributes to maintain the typhoon activity of return to the sea. To use the SST field that changes with time in the typhoon simulation is of benefit to the improvement of prediction, and the 6h SST gives a better result than daily averaged SST.
[1] 梁军, 陈联寿, 吴士杰, 等. 影响黄渤海域热带气旋的灾害分析[J]. 自然灾害学报, 2007, 16(2): 27?33.
[2] 梁军, 陈联寿, 李英, 等. 影响辽东半岛的热带气旋降水分析[J]. 热带气象学报, 2006, 22(1): 41?48.
[3] 梁军, 陈联寿. 影响辽东半岛热带气旋运动、强度和影响的特征[J]. 热带气象学报, 2005, 21(4):410?419.
[4] 孙兴池, 王文毅, 王业宏, 等. 0509号台风麦莎影响山东分析[J]. 热带气象学报, 2007, 23(3): 307?312.
[5] 梁军, 陈联寿, 李英, 等. 北上变性热带气旋对辽东半岛降水的影响[J]. 热带气象学报, 2008, 24(5): 449?458.
[6] 朱先德. 登陆后不同路径再入海台风的观测分析与数值研究[D]. 青岛: 中国海洋大学, 2010: 1?11.
[7] 刘爱鸣, 林毅, 黄美金, 等. 0713号台风韦帕路径预报难点分析[J]. 气象, 2008, 34(10): 27?33.
[8] 梁军, 陈联寿, 李英. 热带气旋在黄海北部转向引发暴雨的环境场特征及数值试验分析[J]. 2007, 31(5): 1011?1020.
[9] 郭丽霞, 陈联寿, 李英. 登陆热带气旋入黄渤海强度变化的环境场特征[J]. 应用气象学报, 2010, 21(5): 570?579.
[10] 金荣花, 高拴柱, 顾华, 等. 近31年登陆北上台风特征及其成因分析[J]. 气象, 2006, 32(7): 33?39.
[11] 郑静, 费建芳, 蒋国荣,等. 海气相互作用对热带气旋发生发展影响研究综述[J]. 海洋预报, 2008, 25(1): 56?64.
[12] 陈颖均, 谢强, 蒙伟光, 等. 不同海表温度对南海台风“杜鹃”的影响试验[J]. 热带气象学报, 2009, 25(4): 401?406.
[13] 刘翔, 蒋国荣, 卓海峰. SST对台风“珍珠”影响的数值试验[J]. 海洋预报, 2009, 26(3): 2?11.
[14] 李英, 陈联寿, 张胜军. 登陆我国热带气旋的统计特征[J].热带气象学报, 2004, 20(1): 14?23.
[15] 王子谦, 段安民, 郑永骏, 等.中尺度海气耦合模式GRAPES_OMLM对台风Chanchu的模拟研究[J]. 气象学报, 2012, 70(2): 261?274.
[16] 陈艳秋, 袁子鹏, 王元. SST对黄海?渤海登陆热带气旋路径和强度的影响[J]. 海洋学报, 2008, 30(1): 31?41.
[17] 苏洁, 李磊, 鲍献文, 等. 黄、渤海表层海温对台风过程响应数值试验[J]. 青岛海洋大学学报, 2001, 31(2): 165?172.
[18] 袁子鹏, 张立祥. 黄渤海登陆热带气旋活动的统计分析[J].气象, 2005, 31(6): 39?42.
[19] 赵德显, 沈桐立, 徐海明. 台风韦帕的数值模拟和诊断分析[J]. 科技信息: 学术版, 2008, (30): 38?41.
[20] 马雷鸣, 李佳, 黄伟, 等. 2007年国内台风模式路径预报效果评估[J]. 气象, 2008, 34(10): 74?80.
[21] 胡向军, 陶健红, 郑飞, 等. WRF模式物理过程参数化方案简介[J]. 甘肃科技, 2008, 24(20): 73?75.
[22] CHEN S H, SUN W Y. A one - dimensional time dependent cloud model [J].Meteor Soc, 2003(80): 99?118.
[23] LIN Y L, FARLEY R, ORVILLE H D. Bulk parame- terization of the snow field in a cloud model[J]. Climate Appl Meteor, 1983, 22: 1065?1092.
[24] RUTLEDGE S A, HOBBS P V. The mesoscale and microscale structure and organization of clouds and precipitation in midlatitude cyclones. XII: A diagnostic modeling study of precipitation development in narrow cloud-frontal rainbands[J]. Atmos Sci, 1984, 20: 2949?2972.
[25] TAO W K, SIMPSON J, McCUMBER M. An ice-water saturation adjustment[J]. Mon Wea Rev, 1989, 117: 231?235.
[26] HONG S Y, LIM J O J. The WRF single-moment 6-class microphysics scheme (WSM6) [J]. Korean Meteor Soc, 2006, 42: 129?151.
[27] 周育锋, 韩志刚. 基于BDA技术的台风初值化方案介绍[C]//中国气象学会2005年年会论文集, 北京: [出版者不详], 2005: 2793?2798.
[28] FOVELL R G, CORBOSIERO K L, KUO H C. Cloud microphysics impact on hurricane track as revealed in idealized experiments[J]. Journal of the Atmospheric Sciences, 2009, 66(6): 1764?1778.
[29] 刘裕禄, 方祥生, 金飞胜, 等.台风凤凰形成发展过程中对流凝结潜热和感热的作用[J]. 气象, 2009, 35(12): 51?57.
[30] 白莉娜, 任福民, 宋金杰, 等. 潜热通量异常对西北太平洋热带气旋活动影响的机理研究[J]. 海洋学报, 2010, 32(4): 32?40.
