海洋灾害学

南海-印度洋海域海洋安全灾害评估与风险区划

展开
  • 1.解放军理工大学气象学院, 江苏 南京 211101; 2. 92962部队气象室, 广东 广州 510320
黎鑫(1985—), 男, 重庆市人, 工程师, 博士, 从事海洋环境保障研究。

收稿日期: 2010-03-04

  修回日期: 2012-01-11

  网络出版日期: 2013-02-06

基金资助

中国博士后科学基金项目(2004036012);江苏省自然科学基金面上项目(BK2011123)

Disaster assessment and risk zoning concerning the South China Sea and Indian Ocean safety

Expand
  • 1. Institute of Meteorology, PLA University of Science and Technology, Nanjing 211101, China; 2. Meteorology Station of No. 92962 Troops, Guangzhou 510320, China

Received date: 2010-03-04

  Revised date: 2012-01-11

  Online published: 2013-02-06

摘要

针对南海-印度洋海域丰富的海洋资源、重要的战略地位以及该海域的自然灾害风险和海盗活动、恐怖袭击与军事冲突等人为灾害风险, 基于风险评估理论从孕灾环境敏感性、致灾因子危险性和承灾体脆弱性等方面选取评价指标并建立评估模型, 利用地理信息系统(GIS)平台得到了该区域的自然灾害风险、人为灾害风险和综合风险区划。结果表明, 冬季(1月), 综合风险最高的区域为亚丁湾、孟加拉湾湾顶、马六甲海峡附近以及越南东南部近海, 其次为南海东北部海域、南沙群岛西部海域、巽他海峡、望加锡海峡、科摩林角附近海域、霍尔木兹海峡及索马里近海; 夏季(7月), 综合风险最高的区域为亚丁湾、孟加拉湾湾顶及马六甲海峡附近, 其次为索马里东北部海域、阿拉伯海中西部、斯里兰卡西南近海、吕宋岛西部近海以及巴士海峡附近。

本文引用格式

黎鑫, 洪梅 王博 张韧 葛珊珊 钱龙霞 . 南海-印度洋海域海洋安全灾害评估与风险区划[J]. 热带海洋学报, 2012 , 31(6) : 121 -127 . DOI: 10.11978/j.issn.1009-5470.2012.06.019

Abstract

Aiming at the rich marine resource, important strategic status and potential natural disaster as well as man-made disaster such as terrorism and military conflict in the South China Sea and Indian Ocean, assessment indices were selected for risk evaluation modeling from disaster-forming environment, menace of disaster-causing factor and disaster-bearing substance based on risk assessment theory. Then, natural disaster risk, man-made disaster risk and synthetic risk were calculated and zoned, respectively, using GIS platform. The results suggested that in winter the regions with the highest synthetic risk are located in the Gulf of Aden, the top of the Bay of Bengal, around Malacca and southeastern offshore of Vietnam, with the second-highest synthetic risk regions located in the northeastern South China Sea, west of the Spratly Islands, Sunda Strait, Makassar Strait, Laccadive Sea, the coast of Somalia and the Hormuz Strait. In summer, the Gulf of Aden, the top of the Bay of Bengal, and Malacca are the highest synthetic risk regions, while the central and western Arabian Sea, northeastern waters off Somalia, southwest coast of Sri Lanka, west coast of Luzon, and region near the Bashi Channel are the second-highest synthetic risk regions.

参考文献

[1] United Nations, Department of Humanitarian Affairs. Mitigating natural disasters: Phenomena effects and options—A manual for policy makers and planners [M]. New York: United Nations, 1991: 1?164.
[2] United Nations, Department of Humanitarian Affairs. Internationally agreed glossary of basic terms related to disaster management[R]. Geneva, 1992: 1?81.
[3] 史培军.论灾害研究的理论与实践[J].南京大学学报: 自然科学版, 1991, 11(自然灾害研究专辑): 37?42.
[4] 黄崇福. 自然灾害风险评价-理论与实践[M]. 北京: 科学出版社, 2005: 3?19.
[5] 谢梦莉. 气象灾害风险因素分析与风险评估思路[J]. 气象与减灾研究, 2007(2): 57?59.
[6] 葛全胜, 邹铭, 郑景云, 等. 中国自然灾害风险综合评估初步研究[M]. 北京: 科学出版社, 2008: 136?234.
[7] 童亿勤, 杨晓平, 李加林. 宁波市水旱灾害孕灾环境因子分析[J]. 灾害学, 2007, 22(3): 32?35.
[8] 莫建飞, 陆甲, 李艳兰, 等. 基于GIS的广西洪涝灾害孕灾环境敏感性评估[J]. 灾害学, 2010, 25(4): 33?37.
[9] 张继权, 冈田宪夫,多多纳裕一. 综合自然灾害风险管理[J]. 自然灾害学报, 2006, 15(7): 29?37.
[10] 许世远, 王军, 石纯, 等. 沿海城市自然灾害风险研究[J]. 地理学报, 2006, 61(2): 127?138.
[11] 樊运晓, 罗云, 陈庆寿. 区域承灾体脆弱性评价指标体系研究[J]. 现代地质, 2001, 11(1): 113?116.
[12] 尹娜, 肖稳安. 区域雷灾易损性分析、评估及易损度区划[J]. 热带气象学报, 2005, 21(4): 441?448.
[13] 汪朝辉, 王克林,熊鹰, 等. 湖南省洪涝灾害脆弱性评估和减灾对策研究[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2003, 12(6): 586?606.
[14] 郝璐, 王静爱, 史培军,等. 草地畜牧业雪灾脆弱性评价——以内蒙古牧区为例[J]. 自然灾害学报, 2003, 12(2): 51?57.
[15] UNDP. Reducing disaster risk: A challenge for development[EB/OL]. [2004-01-10]. http: //www. undp. org/bcpr.
[16] DILLEY M, CHEN R S, DEICHMANN U, et al. Natural disaster hotspots: A global risk analysis [M]. Washington, D C: The International Bank for Reconstruction and Development /The World Bank and Columbia University, 2005: 1?148.
[17] SHI P J, DU J, JI M X, et al. Urban risk assessment research of major natural disasters in China[J]. Advances in Earth Science, 2006: 21(2): 170?177.
[18] CONTHEM C R, CONIGLIO W A, MARCUS W L. Development of quantitative estimates of uncertainty in environmental risk assessments when the scientific data base is inadequate [J]. Environment International, 1986, 12(6): 643?647.
[19] SUTER G W, BARNTHOUSE L W, O'NEILL R V. Treatment of risk in environmental impact assessment[J]. Environmental Management. 1987, 11(3): 295?303.
[20] 邵利民, 周立佳, 石爱国, 等. 船舶海上溢油事故的风险预测及灾害评估[C]. 中日航海学术交流会论文集. 中国武汉: 中国航海学会, 1998: 26?33.
[21] 李品芳, 黄家亮. 模糊综合评判在港口船舶溢油风险区划分中的应用[J]. 交通环保, 1999, 20(2): 12?14.
[22] 肖景坤. 船舶溢油风险评价模式与应用研究[D]. 大连: 大连海事大学, 2001: 1?113.
[23] 洪晓煜, 陈伟琪, 张珞平. 罗源湾船舶溢油风险评价分析[J]. 海洋通报, 2009, 28(1): 59?64.
[24] 中国地图出版社. 世界地图[M]. 北京:中国地图出版社,2010.
[25] 中国地图出版社. 中国地图[M]. 北京:中国地图出版社,2010.
[26] International Maritime Organization. Reports On Acts Of Piracy And Armed Robbery Against Ships[R/OL]. [2010-01-05].http://www.imo.org/includes/blastData.asp/.
[27] 张辉, 高德利. 基于模糊数学和灰色理论的多层次综合评价方法及其应用[J]. 数学的实践与认识, 2008: 38(3), 1?6.
刘来福, 曾文艺. 数学模型与数学建模[M]. 北京: 北京师范大学出版社, 2002: 75?81.
文章导航

/