海洋生物学

两种浮游生物网对南海北部浮游动物捕获效率的比较

  • 连喜平 ,
  • 谭烨辉 ,
  • 刘永宏 ,
  • 黄良民 ,
  • 陈清潮 ,
  • 周林滨
展开
  • 1. 中国科学院南海海洋研究所,海洋生物资源可持续利用重点实验室,广东 广州510301; 2. 中国科学院大学,北京100049
连喜平(1984—),女,山西省吕梁市人,博士研究生。主要从事海洋生态学研究。E-mail:lianxiping2007@163.com

收稿日期: 2012-02-09

  修回日期: 2012-04-04

  网络出版日期: 2013-08-28

Comparison of capture efficiency for zooplankton in the northern South China Sea, using two plankton mesh sizes

  • LIAN Xi-ping ,
  • TAN Ye-hui ,
  • LIU Yong-hong ,
  • HUANG Liang-min ,
  • CHEN Qing-chao ,
  • ZHOU Lin-bin
Expand
  • 1. Key Laboratory of Marine Bio-resource Sustainable Utilization (LMB), South China Sea Institute of Oceanology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Guangzhou 510301, China; 2. University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100049, China;

Received date: 2012-02-09

  Revised date: 2012-04-04

  Online published: 2013-08-28

摘要

浮游动物大小不一,采用不同网目孔径的浮游生物网采样得到的浮游动物种类组成和丰度有差别。为了了解使用不同网具采样对南海北部浮游动物分析的影响,于2007年8月在南海北部采用网目孔径为505μm(大网)和160μm(中网)两种网具进行了浮游动物采样。虽然两种网具对个体较大的浮游动物(水母类、磷虾类、毛颚类等)的捕获率差别不显著,但是大型网捕获的个体较大的浮游动物种类数较中型网捕获的多;对于个体较小的浮游动物,尤其是小型桡足类,大型网的捕获效率远远低于中型网,差异显著;其中对于13种主要小型桡足类[锥形宽水蚤(Temora turbinata)、瘦拟哲水蚤(Paracalanus gracilis)、丽隆水蚤(Oncaea venusta)等]种群,其中网捕获的丰度之和为大网之和的11倍之多。由此可见,两种网具是可以互补的。聚类分析结果表明,尽管两种网具捕获的浮游动物种类组成不同,但浮游动物的群落结构相似,即无论大型网或是中型网采集的浮游动物,都能被分为近岸和远岸两个类群。

本文引用格式

连喜平 , 谭烨辉 , 刘永宏 , 黄良民 , 陈清潮 , 周林滨 . 两种浮游生物网对南海北部浮游动物捕获效率的比较[J]. 热带海洋学报, 2013 , 32(3) : 33 -39 . DOI: 10.11978/j.issn.1009-5470.2013.03.005

Abstract

Zooplankton is a categorization spanning a wide range of organism sizes. Different mesh sizes of the plankton net used in zooplankton research can lead to different results. In order to understand whether the zooplankton community structure has been altered by different mesh sizes of the plankton net in the northern South China Sea, we investigated the catching efficiency in August 2007 using two plankton nets of different mesh sizes. The mesh sizes of large and medium nets are 505 and 160 μm, respectively. The results show that the capture efficiencies of the two nets are not significantly different for large size zooplankton, such as medusae, euphausiids, chaetognathes, and so on. Species of larger zooplankton caught by the large net are higher than those by the medium net. The difference between the two plankton nets was mainly due to the loss of small-size copepods in the samples collected by the 505 μm mesh net. The abundance of 13 dominant small copepods (Temora turbinate, Paracalanus gracilis, Oncaea venusta, and so on) caught by the medium net was 11 times of that by the large net. It suggested that two plankton nets can compensate each other. In addition, although species composition of zooplankton differed in samples collected by nets of different mesh sizes, the zooplankton communities from the two nets are similar under cluster analysis. Zooplankton communities from both nets can be divided into onshore and offshore groups, either with large or medium size plankton net.

参考文献

[1] 郑重, 李少菁, 许振祖. 海洋浮游生物学[M]. 北京: 海洋出版社, 1984: 139.
[2] 王荣, 王克. 两种浮游生物网捕获性能的现场测试[J]. 水产学报, 2003, 27(增刊): 98-102.
[3] EVANS M S, SELL D W. Mesh size and collection characteristics of 50-cm diameter conical plankton nets[J]. Hydrobiologia, 1985, 122: 97-104.
[4] WU C J, SHIN C M, CHIANG K P. Does the mesh size of the plankton net affect the result of statistical analyses of the relationship between the copepod community and water masses?[J]. Crustaceana, 2011, 84: 1069-1083.
[5] MAURO R D, CAPITANIO F, VI?AS M D. Capture efficiency for small dominant mesozooplankters (Copepoda, Appendicularia) off Buenos Aires Province (34°S-41°S), Argentine Sea, using two plankton mesh sizes[J]. Braz J Oceanogr, 2009, 57(3): 205-214.
[6] 李纯厚, 贾晓平, 蔡文贵. 南海北部浮游动物多样性研究[J]. 中国水产科学, 2004, 11(2): 139-146.
[7] 张武昌, 高尚武, 孙军, 等. 南海北部冬季和夏季浮游哲水蚤类群[J]. 海洋与湖沼, 2010, 41(3): 448-458.
[8] ZHANG WUCHANG, TANG DANLING, YANG BO, et al. Onshore-offshore variations of copepod community in northern South China Sea[J]. Hydrobiologia, 2009, 636: 257-269.
[9] 国家技术监督局. GB 12763.6—1991海洋调查规范——海洋生物调查[S]. 北京: 中国标准出版社, 1991: 34-41.
[10] 徐兆礼, 陈亚瞿. 长江口最大浑浊带浮游生物的生态研究[J]. 中国水产科学, 1995, 2(1): 39-48.
[11] CLARKE K R, WARWICK R M. Change in marine communities: an approach to statistical analysis and interpretation[M]. Plymouth: Plymouth marine laboratory, 1994: 57-68.
[12] RICCARDI N. Selectivity of plankton nets over mesozooplankton taxa: implications for abundance, biomass and diversity estimation[J]. J Limnol, 2010, 69(2): 287-296.
[13] HWANG J S, KUMAR R, DAHMS H U, et al. Mesh size affects abundance estimates of Oithona spp. (Copepoda, Cyclopoida)[J]. Crustaceana, 2007, 80(7): 827-837.
[14] 尹健强, 黄良民, 李开枝, 等,南沙群岛珊瑚礁浮游动物多样性与群落结构[J]. 生物多样性, 2011, 19(6): 685-695.
文章导航

/