检索
E-mail
RSS

作者投稿 主编审稿 专家审稿 远程编辑

热带海洋学报 >

2014 , Vol. 33 >Issue 5: 74 - 83

DOI: https://doi.org/10.11978/j.issn.1009-5470.2014.05.010

海洋地球物理学

初至波层析成像的反演参数选取: 以南海中央次海盆三维地震探测数据为例*

  • 王建 ,
  • 赵明辉 ,
  • 贺恩远 ,
  • 张佳政 ,
  • 丘学林
展开
  • 1. 中国科学院边缘海地质重点实验室, 中国科学院南海海洋研究所, 广东 广州 510301; 2. 中国科学院大学, 北京 100049
作者简介：王建(1988~), 男, 湖南省株洲县人, 硕博连读生, 研究方向为海洋深部地球物理。E-mail: marine_wj@163.com

收稿日期: 2013-12-31

  修回日期: 2014-03-28

  网络出版日期: 2014-09-29

基金资助

国家自然科学基金项目(91028002、41176053、41076029)

收起

The selection of optimal inversion parameters for first-arrival seismic tomography: An application to 3D seismic data from the central sub-basin of the South China Sea

  • WANG Jian ,
  • ZHAO Ming-hui ,
  • HE En-yuan ,
  • ZHANG Jia-zheng ,
  • QIU Xue-lin
Expand
  • 1. Key Laboratory of Marginal Sea Geology, South China Sea Institute of Oceanology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Guangzhou 510301, China; 2. University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 10049, China

Received date: 2013-12-31

  Revised date: 2014-03-28

  Online published: 2014-09-29

Fold

摘要

FAST(first arrival seismic tomography)软件是获取复杂地区三维深部结构的最常用工具之一, 而反演参数选取是快速有效地获得真实合理的地震结构的关键环节。以南海中央次海盆三维地震探测数据为基础, 采用先固定其中一个参数、选取另外一个参数、再综合选取的控制变量法, 详细地介绍了FAST反演参数组合的选取过程。选取结果表明, 反演参数组合(阻尼因子λ=2, 平滑度权重因子sz=1, 反演次数I=4)为南海中央次海盆三维地震结构的最佳反演参数, 由此获得的最佳初步速度模型表明中央次海盆具有典型慢速扩张的洋壳结构。此项反演参数选取工作不仅为珍贝-黄岩海山链精细三维地震结构的正式模拟奠定了基础, 同时为FAST软件在其他地区的应用提供了丰富的经验与借鉴。

关键词： 初至波层析成像; 反演参数; 三维地震探测; 中央次海盆

本文引用格式

王建 , 赵明辉 , 贺恩远 , 张佳政 , 丘学林 . 初至波层析成像的反演参数选取: 以南海中央次海盆三维地震探测数据为例*[J]. 热带海洋学报, 2014 , 33(5) : 74 -83 . DOI: 10.11978/j.issn.1009-5470.2014.05.010

Abstract

First arrival seismic tomography (FAST) is one of the most widely used seismic tomography tools to achieve complicated three-dimensional (3D) deep crustal structure. The selection of optimal inversion parameters for FAST is a key to obtain a reasonable velocity model effectively. Based on the 3D seismic survey data collected from the central sub-basin of the South China Sea (SCS), the selection process of inversion parameters was illustrated in detail in this paper, using the control variate method, namely, selecting one parameter while fixing the other parameters, and then selecting the combination of all parameters comprehensively. The result showed that the combination of parameters (damping parameter λ=2, smoothness weighting parameter sz=1, inversion number I=4) was an assembly of optimal inversion parameters for the 3D seismic structure of the central sub-basin of the SCS. The preferred preliminary velocity structure acquired by this combination indicated that the central sub-basin could be classified as a typical slow-spreading oceanic crust. The research of choosing inversion parameters not only lays a foundation for further modeling of detailed 3D seismic structure of the Zhenbei-Huangyan seamount chain but also provides reference and experience for the application of FAST software in other potential areas.

Key words： first arrival seismic tomography (FAST); inversion parameter; three-dimensional (3D) seismic survey; central sub-basin

参考文献

[1] 2012. 初至波旅行时层析成像(FAST)方法研究和应用[D]. 兰州: 中国地震局兰州地震研究所: 34–46.
[2] 赵明辉, 叶春明, 等. 2003. 南海东北部海陆联测与海底地震仪探测[J]. 大地构造与成矿学, 27(4): 295–300.
[3] 赵明辉, 徐辉龙, 等. 2012. 南海深地震探测的重要科学进程:回顾和展望[J]. 热带海洋学报, 31(3): 1–8.
[4] 万玲, 曾维军, 等. 2006. 中国南海海域岩石圈三维结构及演化[M]. 北京: 地质出版社: 52–53.
[5] 丘学林, 徐辉龙, 等. 2011. 南海南部深地震探测及南北共轭陆缘对比[J]. 地球科学: 中国地质大学学报, 36(5): 823–830.
[6] 赵明辉, 王建, 等. 2013. 南海中央次海盆OBS位置校正及三维地震探测新进展[J]. 地球科学: 中国地质大学学报, 8(1): 33–42.
[7] K, LEE W. 1976. Determination of three-dimensional velocity anomalies under a seismic array using first P arrival times from local earthquakes: 1. A homogeneous initial model [J]. J Geophys Res, 81(23): 4381–4399.
[8] A, PATRIAT P, TAPPONNIER P. 1993. Updated interpretation of magnetic anomalies and seafloor spreading stages in the South China Sea: Implications for the Tertiary tectonics of Southeast Asia [J]. J Geophys Res, 98(B4): 6299–6328.
[9] J W, SINGH S C, MIMSHULL T A. 2003. Three- dimensional tomographic inversion of combined reflection and refraction seismic traveltime data [J]. Geophys J Int, 152(1): 79–93.
[10] J A, ZELT B C. 1995. 3-D finite-difference reflection traveltimes [J]. Geophys J Int, 121(2): 427–434.
[11] K, NAKAMURA Y, WANG TK, et al. 2005. Crustal-scale seismic profiles across Taiwan and the western Philippine Sea [J]. Tectonophysics, 401(1): 23–54.
[12] C C, SAUNDERS M A. 1982. LSQR: An algorithm for sparse linear equations and sparse least squares [J]. ACM Trans Math Softw, 8(1): 43–71.
[13] K, DOSSO S, SPENCE G, et al. 2005. Forearc structure beneath southwestern British Columbia: A three-dimensional tomographic velocity model [J]. J Geophys Res, 110(B2). doi:10.1029/2004JB003258.
[14] K, HYNDMAN R, BROCHER T. 2006. Regional P wave velocity structure of the Northern Cascadia Subduction Zone [J]. J Geophys Res, 111(B12). doi:10.1029/ 2005JB004108.
[15] J I, JUHLIN C, BERGMAN B. 2006. First arrival seismic tomography (FAST) vs. PStomo_eq applied to crooked line seismic data from the Siljan ring area [J]. Comput Geosci, 32(4): 497–511.
[16] J E. 1988. Finite-difference calculation of travel times [J]. Bull Seismol Soc Am, 78(6): 2062–2076.
[17] J E. 1990. Finite-difference calculation of traveltimes in three dimensions [J]. Geophysics, 55(5): 521–526.
[18] R S, MCKENZIE D, O'NIONS R K. 1992. Oceanic crustal thickness from seismic measurements and rare earth[18] element inversions [J]. J Geophys Res, 97(B13): 19683– 19715.
[19] MIN, CANALES J P, TUCHOLKE B E, et al. 2009. Heterogeneous seismic velocity structure of the upper lithosphere at Kane oceanic core complex, Mid-Atlantic Ridge [J]. Geochem Geophys Geosyst, 10(10). doi:10.1029/ 2009GC002586.
[20] C A, BARTON P J. 1998. Three-dimensional seismic refraction tomography: A comparison of two methods applied to data from the Faeroe Basin [J]. J Geophys Res, 103(B4): 7187–7210.
[21] MINGHUI, CANALES J P, SOHN R A. 2012. Three- dimensional seismic structure of a Mid-Atlantic Ridge segment characterized by active detachment faulting (Trans- Atlantic Geotraverse, 25°55°N-26°20°N) [J]. Geochem Geophys Geosyst, 13(1). doi:10.1029/2012GC004454.
Options
文章导航

/

〈 〉