海洋生物学

硬骨鱼类核糖体基因间隔区的序列特征分析

  • 司李真 ,
  • 时伟 ,
  • 杨敏 ,
  • 龚理 ,
  • 孔晓瑜
展开
  • 1. 中国科学院南海海洋研究所, 热带海洋生物资源与生态重点实验室, 广东 广州 510301;
    2. 中国科学院大学, 北京 100049
作者简介:司李真(1990-), 女, 河南省荥阳市人, 硕士, 从事鱼类分类及系统进化研究。E-mail: LZsi314003@126.com

收稿日期: 2016-01-29

  修回日期: 2016-06-27

  网络出版日期: 2016-12-15

基金资助

国家自然科学基金项目(31272273)

Feature analysis of the internal transcribed spacers in teleost ribosomal DNA

  • SI Lizhen ,
  • SHI Wei ,
  • YANG Min ,
  • GONG Li ,
  • KONG Xiaoyu
Expand
  • 1. Key Laboratory of Tropical Marine Bio-resources and Ecology, South China Sea Institute of Oceanology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Guangzhou 510301, China;
    2. University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100049, China

Received date: 2016-01-29

  Revised date: 2016-06-27

  Online published: 2016-12-15

Supported by

National Natural Science Foundation of China (31272273)

摘要

真核生物核糖体DNA (ribosomal DNA, 简称rDNA)是由几十个甚至上万个高度串联重复序列组成的多基因家族, 每个重复单元都包括编码区(18S、5.8S和28S)和非编码区(ITS1和ITS2)。间隔区ITS1和ITS2常被用于属级及以下阶元水平的系统关系研究。然而, 越来越多的研究发现, 这些串联重复序列并非完全一致, 有些甚至存在个体内差异, 这种基因组内ITS多态性的发现, 使我们对ITS用于物种系统发育重建的适用性产生了质疑。因此, 我们对GeneBank中硬骨鱼类的10目ITS序列的长度和保守位点比例进行了统计分析, 结果显示: ITS1长度范围为272~918bp, 保守位点比例在各分类单元之间具有明显的区别, 并且这种区别可以作为判断物种之间关系的特征。当序列之间保守位点比例为89.51%~100%时, 为种内关系; 在61.53%~81.36%范围时, 为种间关系; 在32.47%~58.87%范围时, 为属间关系; 而在1.62%~30.46%时, 达到科间水平。而一些物种的保守位点比例超出此范围时, 依据此标准判断就会产生偏差。ITS2的长度范围为128~694bp, 保守位点比例在各分类阶元之间互相重合, 在各分类阶元之间不存在明显的差异, 因此该特征不能用于区分各阶元之间的关系。

本文引用格式

司李真 , 时伟 , 杨敏 , 龚理 , 孔晓瑜 . 硬骨鱼类核糖体基因间隔区的序列特征分析[J]. 热带海洋学报, 2016 , 35(6) : 74 -81 . DOI: 10.11978/2016012

Abstract

Eukaryotic ribosomal DNA (rDNA) consists of dozens or even tens of thousands of tandem repeat Units. Each repeat unit includes three coding genes (18S, 5.8S and 28S) and two internal transcribed spacers (internal transcribed spacer 1 and internal transcribed spacer 2). The two internal transcribed spacers (ITS1 and ITS2) are often used for phylogenetic study of genus or lower level. However, an increasing number of studies have been shown that not all repeat units are identical; some of them have obviously intraspecific variations, as a result, which raise a question whether it is a useful tool for phylogenetic reconstruction. Accordingly, sequence length and conservation ratio of the internal transcribed spacers from GeneBank database including 10 orders of teleost were analyzed in order to explore the features of ITS1 and ITS2. The results showed that lengths of ITS1 were from 272 to 918 bp. The conservation ratio had distinct differences among each taxon, which could be used as a potential marker to identify the relationships among most species. When the conservation ratio ranged from 89.51% to 100%, it indicated an intraspecific relationship, from 61.53% to 81.36% as an interspecific relationship. When the number varied from 32.47% to 55.87%, the relationship was defined as an intergeneric one; and it was an interfamily relationship for the data between 1.62% and 30.46%. However, there were also several exceptions, which would lead to inaccuracy phylogenetic relationship. By contrast, the lengths of ITS2 varied from 128 to 694 bp, and the conservation ratio among each taxon almost had a continuous value, suggesting that it was not suitable for identifying taxonomic category.

参考文献

[1] 孙玉华, 谢从新, 刘思阳, 2006. 亚口鱼科鱼类核DNA 18S- ITS1-5.8S序列比较分析[J]. 水生生物学报, 30(3): 367–370. SUN YUHUA, XIE CONGXIN, LIU SIYANG, 2006. The genetic variation of 18S-ITS1-5.8S sequences of 7 Catostomids[J]. Acta Hydrobiologica Sinica, 30(3): 367–370 (in Chinese).
[2] 徐晖, 李军, 孔晓瑜, 等, 2008. 6种舌鳎亚科鱼类ITS1序列长度多态性及系统分析[J]. 海洋与湖沼, 39(1): 35–41. XU HUI, LI JUN, KONG XIAOYU, et al, 2008. Phylogenetic relationship and length variation in the first ribosomal internal transcribed spacer of Cynoglossinae species[J]. Oceanologia et Limnologia Sinica, 39(1): 35–41 (in Chinese).
[3] 张源真, 王伟, 姜志强, 2012. 基于ITS-1序列的部分鳚亚目鱼类的分子系统进化关系研究[J]. 现代农业科技, (8): 318–320. ZHANG YUANZHEN, WANG WEI, JIANG ZHIQIANG, 2012. Research on molecular phylogenetic relationship of partial Blennioidei based on ITS-1 sequences[J]. Modern Agricultural Science and Technology, (8): 318–320 (in Chinese).
[4] AKTAS M, BENDELE K G, ALTAY K, et al, 2007. Sequence polymorphism in the ribosomal DNA internal transcribed spacers differs among Theileria species[J]. Veterinary Parasitology, 147(3/4): 221–230.
[5] áLVAREZ I, 2003. Ribosomal ITS sequences and plant phylogenetic inference[J]. Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution, 29(3): 417–434.
[6] ARNHEIM N, 1983. Concerted evolution of multigene families[M]// NEI M, KOEHN R. Evolution of genes and proteins. Sunderland. Massachusetts: Sinauer Associates Inc: 38–61.
[7] AVISE J C, 1989. Gene trees and organismal histories: A phylogenetic approach to population biology[J]. Evolution, 43(6): 1192–1208.
[8] BAILEY C, 2003. Characterization of angiosperm nrDNA polymorphism, paralogy, and pseudogenes[J]. Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution, 29(3): 435–455.
[9] BALDWIN B G, SANDERSON M J, PORTER J M, et al, 1995. The its region of nuclear ribosomal DNA: A valuable source of evidence on angiosperm phylogeny[J]. Annals of the Missouri Botanical Garden, 82(2): 247–277.
[10] CHOW S, NAKAGAWA T, SUZUKI N, et al, 2006. Phylogenetic relationships among Thunnus species inferred from rDNA ITS1 sequence[J]. Journal of Fish Biology, 68: 24–35.
[11] CHOW S, UENO Y, TOYOKAWA M, et al, 2009. Preliminary analysis of length and GC content variation in the ribosomal first internal transcribed spacer (ITS1) of marine animals[J]. Marine Biotechnology, 11(3): 301–306.
[12] COLEMAN A W, 2013. Analysis of mammalian rDNA internal transcribed spacers[J]. PLoS ONE, 8(11): e79122.
[13] DOVER G A, 1986. Molecular drive in multigene families: How biological novelties arise, spread and are assimilated[J]. Trends in Genetics, 2: 159–165.
[14] EICKBUSH T H, EICKBUSH D G, 2007. Finely orchestrated movements: Evolution of the ribosomal RNA genes[J]. Genetics, 175(2): 477–485.
[15] GONG LI, SHI WEI, YANG MIN, et al, 2016. Non-concerted evolution in ribosomal ITS2 sequence in Cynoglossus zanzibarensis (Pleuronectiformes: Cynoglossidae)[J]. Biochemical Systematics and Ecology, 66: 181–187.
[16] HARPKE D, PETERSON A, 2006. Non-concerted ITS evolution in Mammillaria (Cactaceae)[J]. Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution, 41(3): 579–593.
[17] HE MAOXIAN, HUANG LIANGMIN, SHI JIANHUA, et al, 2005. Variability of ribosomal DNA ITS-2 and its utility in detecting genetic relatedness of Pearl oyster[J]. Marine Biotechnology, 7(1): 40–45.
[18] HUYSE T, VAN HOUDT J, VOLCKAERT F A M, 2004. Paleoclimatic history and vicariant speciation in the “sand goby” group (Gobiidae, Teleostei)[J]. Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution, 32(1): 324–336.
[19] JANSEN G, DEVAERE S, WEEKERS P H H, et al, 2006. Phylogenetic relationships and divergence time estimate of African anguilliform catfish (Siluriformes: Clariidae) inferred from ribosomal gene and spacer sequences[J]. Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution, 38(1): 65–78.
[20] KUMAR R, SINGH M, KUSHWAHA B, et al, 2013. Molecular characterization of major and minor rDNA repeats and genetic variability assessment in different species of mahseer found in North India[J]. Gene, 527(1): 248–258.
[21] KURIIWA K, HANZAWA N, YOSHINO T, et al, 2007. Phylogenetic relationships and natural hybridization in rabbitfishes (Teleostei: Siganidae) inferred from mitochondrial and nuclear DNA analyses[J]. Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution, 45(1): 69–80.
[22] LONG E O, DAWID I B, 1980. Repeated genes in eukaryotes[J]. Annual Review of Biochemistry, 49: 727–764.
[23] MINDELL D P, HONEYCUTT R L, 1990. Ribosomal RNA in vertebrates: Evolution and phylogenetic applications[J]. Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics, 21: 541–566.
[24] MU XIDONG, GU DANGEN, YANG YEXIN, et al, 2013. Genetic diversity and phylogeny of the family Osteoglossidae by the nuclear 18S ribosomal RNA and implications for its conservation[J]. Biochemical Systematics and Ecology, 51: 280–287.
[25] PLEYTE K A, DUNCAN S D, PHILLIPS R B, 1992. Evolutionary relationships of the salmonid fish genus Salvelinus inferred from DNA sequences of the first internal transcribed spacer (ITS1) of ribosomal DNA[J]. Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution, 1(3): 223–230.
[26] REED K M, HACKETT J D, PHILLIPS R B, 2000. Comparative analysis of intra-individual and inter-species DNA sequence variation in salmonid ribosomal DNA cistrons[J]. Gene, 249(1/2): 115–125.
[27] SHAPOVAL N A, LUKHTANOV V A, 2015. Intragenomic variations of multicopy ITS2 marker in Agrodiaetus blue butterflies (Lepidoptera, Lycaenidae)[J]. Comparative Cytogenetics, 9(4): 483–497.
[28] TAMURA K, PETERSON D, PETERSON N, et al, 2011. MEGA5: Molecular evolutionary genetics analysis using maximum likelihood, evolutionary distance, and maximum parsimony methods[J]. Molecular Biology and Evolution, 28(10): 2731–2739.
[29] THOMPSON J D, GIBSON T J, PLEWNIAK F, et al, 1997. The CLUSTAL_X windows interface: Flexible strategies for multiple sequence alignment aided by quality analysis tools[J]. Nucleic Acids Research, 25(24): 4876–4882.
[30] VON DER SCHULENBURG J H G, ENGLISCH U, WAGELE J W, 1999. Evolution of ITS1 rDNA in the Digenea (Platyhelminthes: Trematoda): 3' end sequence conservation and its phylogenetic utility[J]. Journal of Molecular Evolution, 48(1): 2–12.
[31] VON DER SCHULENBURG J H G, HANCOCK J M, PAGNAMENTA A, et al, 2001. Extreme length and length variation in the first ribosomal internal transcribed spacer of ladybird beetles (Coleoptera: Coccinellidae)[J]. Molecular Biology and Evolution, 18(4): 648–660.
[32] WENDEL J F, DOYLE J J, 1998. Phylogenetic incongruence: window into genome history and molecular evolution[M]// SOLTIS D E, SOLTIS P S, DOYLE J J. Molecular systematics of plants Ⅱ. Berlin Heidelberg: Springer: 265–296.
[33] XIAO LONGQIAN, ZHU HUA, 2009. Intra-genomic polymor?phism in the internal transcribed spacer (ITS) regions of Cycas revoluta: Evidence of incomplete concerted evolution[J]. Biodiversity Science, 17(5): 476–481.
[34] XU JIANPENG, ZHANG QUANQI, XU XIAOFEI, et al, 2009. Intragenomic variability and pseudogenes of ribosomal DNA in Stone flounder Kareius bicoloratus[J]. Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution, 52(1): 157–166.
[35] YAO HUI, SONG JINGYUAN, LIU CHANG, et al, 2010. Use of ITS2 region as the universal DNA barcode for plants and animals[J]. PLoS ONE, 5(10): e13102.
[36] YU DAHUI, CHU KAHOU, 2005. Phylogenetics of the common pearl oysters in the genus Pinctada: Evidence from nrDNA ITS sequence[J]. Biodiversity Science, 13(4): 315–323.
文章导航

/