主要养殖贝类固碳能力评估及其影响因素——以烟台海域为例

doi:10.11978/2024128

热带海洋学报 ›› 2025, Vol. 44 ›› Issue (3): 95-103.doi: 10.11978/2024128CSTR: 32234.14.2024128

主要养殖贝类固碳能力评估及其影响因素——以烟台海域为例

王政¹(), 杨涛², 王一娜¹, 李明³(), 裴鹏兵⁴, 杜虹⁴, 张建柏²(), 沈萍萍¹()

1.烟台大学海洋学院, 山东烟台 264005
2.烟台海洋经济研究院, 山东烟台 264005
3.山东省烟台生态环境监测中心, 山东烟台 264000
4.汕头大学海洋灾害预警与防护广东省重点实验室, 广东汕头 515063

收稿日期:2024-06-24 修回日期:2024-08-02 出版日期:2025-05-10 发布日期:2025-06-04
通讯作者: 李明, 张建柏, 沈萍萍
作者简介:
王政(1998—), 硕士研究生, 主要从事海洋碳汇研究。email: 363909644@qq.com
基金资助:
汕头大学海洋灾害预警与防护广东省重点实验室(GPKLMD2023001); 国家环境保护近岸海域生态环境重点实验室开放课题(202311); 国家自然科学基金项目(42376159)

Assessment of carbon sequestration capacity of cultivated bivalves and influencing factors in Yantai sea areas

WANG Zheng¹(), YANG Tao², WANG Yina¹, LI Ming³(), PEI Pengbing⁴, DU Hong⁴, ZHANG Jianbai²(), SHEN Pingping¹()

1. Ocean School, Yantai University, Yantai 264005, China
2. Yantai Marine Economy Research Institute, Yantai 264005, China
3. Yantai Ecological Environment Monitoring Center, Shandong Province, Yantai 264000, China
4. Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Marine Disaster Prediction and Prevention, Shantou University, Shantou 515063, China

Received:2024-06-24 Revised:2024-08-02 Online:2025-05-10 Published:2025-06-04
Contact: LI Ming, ZHANG Jianbai, SHEN Pingping
Supported by:
Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Marine Disaster Prediction and Prevention, Shantou University(GPKLMD2023001); Open Project of the National Key Laboratory for Environmental Protection of Coastal Ecological Environment(202311); National Natural Science Foundation of China(42376159)

摘要/Abstract

摘要：

贝类是海洋生态系统重要组成部分, 通过生命活动利用和固定海水中CO₂, 发挥重要碳汇作用。本文基于碳储量法探究了烟台各海域不同种类、规格贝类的固碳能力。不同种贝类固碳能力差别巨大, 其固碳能力随着个体增大显著增强。其中养殖型长牡蛎(Crassostrea gigas)、野生型长牡蛎(Ostrea plicatula)、栉孔扇贝(Chlamys farreri)、海湾扇贝(Argopecten irradians)及紫贻贝(Mytilus galloprovincialis)的固碳能力分别为3.37~16.64、2.87~14.17、0.21~2.10、0.87~1.58及0.21~0.38g·a^-1·ind^-1。牡蛎的固碳能力远远高于扇贝和贻贝(P<0.01), 而不同海域相同贝类的固碳能力无显著差异(P>0.01)。此外, 基于贝类碳汇计量指标的实际测定值与标准参考值进行烟台市主要养殖贝类碳汇量核算发现, 牡蛎碳汇量实测值显著高于标准估算量(P<0.01), 而扇贝的碳汇量实测值显著低于标准估算量(P<0.01), 长岛海域海湾扇贝及贻贝的碳汇实际核算量与标准估算量之间差异显著(P<0.01)。贝类固碳能力与其种类及个体大小直接相关, 表明贝类碳汇计量模型中参数的设定不仅要考虑养殖品种, 也要考虑个体大小的组成。

关键词: 贝类, 碳汇能力, 碳汇量, 烟台海域

Abstract:

Bivalves play an important role as carbon sinks by absorbing and fixing CO₂ in seawater. This study explores the carbon sequestration capacity (CSC) of different species and sizes of bivalves cultivated in Yantai sea areas to determine their carbon stocks. The results showed that the CSC of different species varied greatly, and increased significantly with the individual size. The CSC of Crassostrea gigas (farmed C. gigas), Ostrea plicatula (wild C. gigas), Chlamys farreri, Argopecten irradians and Mytilus galloprovincialis were 3.37’16.64, 2.87’14.17, 0.21’2.10, 0.87’1.58 and 0.21’0.38 g·a^-1·ind^-1, respectively. The CSC of oysters was much higher than that of scallops and mussels (P<0.01), and there was no significant difference among sampling sites. In addition, based on the measured and the standard reference values of bivalves carbon sink evaluation parameters, the actual measured amount of oyster carbon sinks in three study areas of Yantai was significantly higher than the estimation based on standard reference values (P<0.01), but the result was opposite for scallops. There was significant difference between the actual measured amount of carbon sinks and the standard estimation of A. irradians and M. galloprovincialis in Changdao waters (P<0.01), which was related to bivalve species and individual sizes. The results showed that the setting of parameters in the bivalve carbon sink evaluation model should take into account not only the composition of the species but also the individual size.

Key words: bivalve, carbon sequestration capacity, carbon sink, Yantai sea areas

中图分类号:

王政, 杨涛, 王一娜, 李明, 裴鹏兵, 杜虹, 张建柏, 沈萍萍. 主要养殖贝类固碳能力评估及其影响因素——以烟台海域为例[J]. 热带海洋学报, 2025, 44(3): 95-103.

WANG Zheng, YANG Tao, WANG Yina, LI Ming, PEI Pengbing, DU Hong, ZHANG Jianbai, SHEN Pingping. Assessment of carbon sequestration capacity of cultivated bivalves and influencing factors in Yantai sea areas[J]. Journal of Tropical Oceanography, 2025, 44(3): 95-103.

图/表 7

图1

表1

表2

图2

图3

表3

图4

参考文献 38

[1]	公丕海, 李娇, 关长涛, 等, 2014. 莱州湾增殖礁附着牡蛎的固碳量试验与估算[J]. 应用生态学报, 25(10): 3032-3038.
	GONG PIHAI, LI JIAO, GUAN CHANGTAO, et al, 2014. Estimation and experiment of carbon sequestration by oysters attached to the enhancement artificial reefs in Laizhou Bay, Shandong, China[J]. Chinese Journal of Applied Ecology, 25(10): 3032-3038 (in Chinese with English abstract).
[2]	顾波军, 朱梓豪, 2021. 浙江省海水贝藻养殖碳汇能力测算及时空演化[J]. 中国渔业经济, 39(6): 88-95.
	GU BOJUN, ZHU ZIHAO, 2021. An estimation of carbon sink capacity of shellfish and algae culture and its spatio-temporal evolution in Zhejiang Province[J]. Chinese Fisheries Economics, 39(6): 88-95 (in Chinese with English abstract).
[3]	郭波, 2015. 中国海水贝藻养殖碳汇潜力的评估研究[J]. 现代农业科技, (19): 226-228.
	GUO BO, 2015. Study on assessment of carbon sequestration potential of marine shellfish culture in China[J]. Modern Agricultural Science and Technology, (19): 226-228 (in Chinese with English abstract).
[4]	贺加贝, 孙俊荣, 赵强, 等, 2022. 烟台市贝藻养殖的碳汇贡献及能力评价[J]. 海洋湖沼通报, 44(3): 117-122.
	HE JIABEI, SUN JUNRONG, ZHAO QIANG, et al, 2022. Contribution and ability assessments of carbon sink by marine bivalves and seaweeds in Yantai coastal water[J]. Transactions of Oceanology and Limnology, 44(3): 117-122 (in Chinese with English abstract).
[5]	胡田, 苏洁, 邵魁双, 等, 2024. 贝藻养殖碳汇过程、机制与增汇模式研究进展[J]. 水产科技情报, 51(3): 194-200.
	HU TIAN, SU JIE, SHAO KUISHUANG, et al, 2024. Research progress on carbon sequestration process, mechanism and sequestration mode of shellfish and algae culture[J]. Fisheries Science & Technology Information, 51(3): 194-200 (in Chinese with English abstract).
[6]	姜娓娓, 房景辉, 蔺凡, 等, 2022. 胶州湾菲律宾蛤仔生态容量评估及其碳汇功能[J]. 渔业科学进展, 43(5): 61-71.
	JIANG WEIWEI, FANG JINGHUI, LIN FAN, et al, 2022. Evaluation of ecological carrying capacity and functions of Manila clam, Ruditapes philippinarum in Jiaozhou Bay[J]. Progress in Fishery Sciences, 43(5): 61-71 (in Chinese with English abstract).
[7]	蒋增杰, 方建光, 毛玉泽, 等, 2022. 滤食性贝类养殖碳汇功能研究进展及未来值得关注的科学问题[J]. 渔业科学进展, 43(5): 106-114.
	JIANG ZENGJIE, FANG JIANGUANG, MAO YUZE, et al, 2022. Research progress on the carbon sink function of filter-feeding shellfish mariculture and future scientific issues[J]. Progress in Fishery Sciences, 43(5): 106-114 (in Chinese with English abstract).
[8]	李成林, 宋爱环, 胡炜, 等, 2011. 山东省扇贝养殖产业现状分析与发展对策[J]. 海洋科学, 35(3): 92-98.
	LI CHENGLIN, SONG AIHUAN, HU WEI, et al, 2011. Status analyzing and developing counter-measure of cultured scallop industry in Shandong Province[J]. Marine Sciences, 35(3): 92-98 (in Chinese with English abstract).
[9]	刘超, 2016. 华贵栉孔扇贝不同群体遗传差异分析及生长相关标记筛选[D]. 湛江: 广东海洋大学.
	LIU CHAO, 2016. Genetic variation analysis and screening of microsatellite markers associated with growth traits in Chlamys nobilis reeve[D]. Zhanjiang: Guangdong Ocean University (in Chinese with English abstract).
[10]	罗渡, 汪学杰, 徐猛, 等, 2018. 贝类壳-体质量比和静水沉降特性的相关性[J]. 生态学报, 38(18): 6778-6785.
	LUO DU, WANG XUEJIE, XU MENG, et al, 2018. Correlation between shell-body mass ratio and hydrostatic settling characteristics of mollusc species[J]. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 38(18): 6778-6785 (in Chinese with English abstract).
[11]	聂梦晨, 黄翠玲, 隋琪, 等, 2022. 桑沟湾沉积物有机质的碳氮稳定同位素分析及其来源解析[J]. 渔业科学进展, 43(5): 84-97.
	NIE MENGCHEN, HUANG CUILING, SUI QI, et al, 2022. Carbon and nitrogen stable isotope analysis and source identification of organic matter in sediments of Sanggou Bay[J]. Progress in Fishery Sciences, 43(5): 84-97 (in Chinese with English abstract).
[12]	齐占会, 王珺, 黄洪辉, 等, 2012. 广东省海水养殖贝藻类碳汇潜力评估[J]. 南方水产科学, 8(1): 30-35.
	QI ZHANHUI, WANG JUN, HUANG HONGHUI, et al, 2012. Potential assessment of carbon sink capacity by marine bivalves and seaweeds in Guangdong Province[J]. South China Fisheries Science, 8(1): 30-35 (in Chinese with English abstract).
[13]	任黎华, 2014. 桑沟湾筏式养殖长牡蛎及其主要滤食性附着生物固碳功能研究[D]. 青岛: 中国科学院研究生院(海洋研究所).
	REN LIHUA, 2014. Research on carbon sequestration of cultured oyster Crassostrea gigas and its fouling organisms in Sanggou Bay[D]. Qingdao: Institute of Oceanology, Chinese Academy of Sciences (in Chinese with English abstract).
[14]	唐启升, 方建光, 张继红, 等, 2013. 多重压力胁迫下近海生态系统与多营养层次综合养殖[J]. 渔业科学进展, 34(1): 1-11.
	TANG QISHENG, FANG JIANGUANG, ZHANG JIHONG, et al, 2013. Impacts of multiple stressors on coastal ocean ecosystems and integrated multi-trophic aquaculture[J]. Progress in Fishery Sciences, 34(1): 1-11 (in Chinese with English abstract).
[15]	唐启升, 蒋增杰, 毛玉泽, 2022. 渔业碳汇与碳汇渔业定义及其相关问题的辨析[J]. 渔业科学进展, 43(5): 1-7.
	TANG QISHENG, JIANG ZENGJIE, MAO YUZE, 2022. Clarification on the definitions and its relevant issues of fisheries carbon sink and carbon sink fisheries[J]. Progress in Fishery Sciences, 43(5): 1-7 (in Chinese with English abstract).
[16]	王俊, 唐启升, 2001. 双壳贝类能量学及其研究进展[J]. 海洋水产研究, 22(3): 80-83.
	WANG JUN, TANG QISHENG, 2001. Advancements in studies on energy budget of bivalve molluscs[J]. Progress in Fishery Sciences, 22(3): 80-83 (in Chinese with English abstract).
[17]	温瑞, 2021. 养殖贝类固碳计量与价格核算及对策研究[D]. 厦门: 自然资源部第三海洋研究所.
	WEN RUI, 2021. Research on the measurement and price accounting of carbon sequestration of cultured shellfish and countermeasures[D]. Xiamen: Third Institute of Oceanography, Ministry of Natural Resources (in Chinese with English abstract).
[18]	徐晓莹, 史文凯, 贺加贝, 等, 2023. 山东省贝藻养殖碳汇能力评估[J]. 中国渔业经济, 41(1): 64-70.
	XU XIAOYING, SHI WENKAI, HE JIABEI, et al, 2023. Evaluation of carbon sink capacity of shellfish and algae in Shandong Province[J]. Chinese Fisheries Economics, 41(1): 64-70 (in Chinese with English abstract).
[19]	许瀚之, 张华, 熊盼盼, 等, 2022. 马氏珠母贝异速生长个体对免疫刺激的差异响应[J]. 热带海洋学报, 41(5): 180-188. doi: 10.11978/2021095
	XU HANZHI, ZHANG HUA, XIONG PANPAN, et al, 2022. Differential responses of allometric individuals to immune stimuli in Pinctada fucata martensii[J]. Journal of Tropical Oceanography, 41(5): 180-188 (in Chinese with English abstract).
[20]	尹钰文, 车鉴, 魏海峰, 等, 2022. 辽宁省2010-2019年海水养殖贝藻类碳汇能力评估[J]. 海洋开发与管理, 39(9): 17-23.
	YIN YUWEN, CHEN JIAN, WEI HAIFENG, et al, 2022. Carbon sink capacity assessment of mariculture shellfish and algae in Liaoning Province from 2010 to 2019[J]. Ocean Development and Management, 39(9): 17-23 (in Chinese with English abstract).
[21]	于宗赫, 陈康, 杨红生, 等, 2010. 海州湾前三岛海域栉孔扇贝(Chlamys farreri)生长特征与养殖容量的评估[J]. 海洋与湖沼, 41(4): 563-570.
	YU ZONGHE, CHEN KANG, YANG HONGSHENG, et al, 2010. The carrying capacity of scallop Chlamys farreri in suspended culture in Qiansan islets, Haizhou Bay[J]. Oceanologia Et Limnologia Sinica, 41(4): 563-570 (in Chinese with English abstract).
[22]	岳冬冬, 王鲁民, 2012. 我国海水养殖贝类产量与其碳汇的关系[J]. 江苏农业科学, 40(11): 246-248 (in Chinese).
[23]	张波, 唐启升, 2022. 中国近海渔业生物捕捞群体碳汇评估[J]. 渔业科学进展, 43(5): 126-131.
	ZHANG BO, TANG QISHENG, 2022. Carbon sink assessment for capture stock in China coastal ocean[J]. Progress in Fishery Sciences, 43(5): 126-131 (in Chinese with English abstract).
[24]	张继红, 方建光, 唐启升, 等, 2013. 桑沟湾不同区域养殖栉孔扇贝的固碳速率[J]. 渔业科学进展, 34(1): 12-16.
	ZHANG JIHONG, FANG JIANGUANG, TANG QISHENG, et al, 2013. Carbon sequestration rate of the scallop Chlamys farreri cultivated in different areas of Sanggou Bay[J]. Progress in Fishery Sciences, 34(1): 12-16 (in Chinese with English abstract).
[25]	张麋鸣, 颜金培, 叶旺旺, 等, 2022. 福建省贝藻类养殖碳汇及其潜力评估[J]. 应用海洋学学报, 41(1): 53-59.
	ZHANG MIMING, YAN JINPEI, YE WANGWANG, et al, 2022. Carbon sequestration and its potentiality of marine shellfish and seaweed cultures in Fujian Province, China[J]. Journal of Applied Oceanography, 41(1): 53-59 (in Chinese with English abstract).
[26]	张明亮, 邹健, 毛玉泽, 等, 2011. 养殖栉孔扇贝对桑沟湾碳循环的贡献[J]. 渔业现代化, 38(4): 13-16, 31.
	ZHANG MINGLIANG, ZOU JIAN, MAO YUZE, et al, 2011. Contribution of culturing scallop to carbon cycle in Sanggou Bay[J]. Fishery Modernization, 38(4): 13-16, 31 (in Chinese with English abstract).
[27]	张先基, 2013. 基于XRF测碳技术的中国海水贝类养殖碳汇研究[D]. 大连: 辽宁师范大学.
	ZHANG XIANJI, 2013. A research of carbon sink based on the technology of XRF measuring carbon for marine culture of shellfish in China[D]. Dalian: Liaoning Normal University (in Chinese with English abstract).
[28]	中华人民共和国自然资源部, 2021. HY/T 0305-2021 养殖大型藻类和双壳贝类碳汇计量方法碳储量变化法[S]. 北京: 中国标准出版社.
	Ministry of Natural Resources, People’s Republic of China, 2021a. HY/T 0305-2021 Estimation method of maricultural seaweed and bivalve carbon sink—carbon stock variation method[S]. Beijing: Standards Press of China. (in Chinese).
[29]	中华人民共和国自然资源部, 2022. HY/T0349-2022 海洋碳汇核算方法[S] 北京: 中国标准出版社.
	Ministry of Natural Resources, People’s Republic of China, 2022. HY/T0349-2022 Accounting methods for ocean carbon sink[S]. Beijing: Standards Press of China. (in Chinese).
[30]	周毅, 杨红生, 刘石林, 等, 2002. 烟台四十里湾浅海养殖生物及附着生物的化学组成、有机净生产量及其生态效应[J]. 水产学报, 26(1): 21-27.
	ZHOU YI, YANG HONGSHENG, LIU SHILIN, et al, 2002. Chemical composition and net organic production of cultivated and fouling organisms in Sishili Bay and their ecological effects[J]. Journal of Fisheries of China, 26(1): 21-27 (in Chinese with English abstract).
[31]	BAUER J E, CAI WEIJUN, RAYMOND P A, et al, 2013. The changing carbon cycle of the coastal ocean[J]. Nature, 504 (7478): 61-70.
[32]	BERTOLINI C, BERNARDINI I, BRIGOLIN D, et al, 2021. A bioenergetic model to address carbon sequestration potential of shellfish farming: example from Ruditapes philippinarum in the Venice lagoon[J]. ICES Journal of Marine Science, 78(6): 2082-2091.
[33]	CHARRIER M, MARIE A, GUILLAUME D, et al, 2013. Soil calcium availability influences shell ecophenotype formation in the sub-Antarctic land snail, Notodiscus hookeri[J]. PLoS One, 8(12): e84527.
[34]	DUARTE C M, LOSADA I J, HENDRIKS I E, et al, 2013. The role of coastal plant communities for climate change mitigation and adaptation[J]. Nature Climate Change, 3(11): 961-968.
[35]	HUMPHREYS M P, DANIELS C J, WOLF-GLADROW D A, et al, 2018. On the influence of marine biogeochemical processes over CO₂ exchange between the atmosphere and ocean[J]. Marine Chemistry, 199: 1-11.
[36]	NELSON K A, LEONARD L A, POSEY M H, et al, 2004. Using transplanted oyster (Crassostrea virginica) beds to improve water quality in small tidal creeks: a pilot study[J]. Journal of Experimental Marine Biology and Ecology, 298(2): 347-368.
[37]	TAMBURINI E, TUROLLA E, LANZONI M, et al, 2022. Manila clam and Mediterranean mussel aquaculture is sustainable and a net carbon sink[J]. Science of the Total Environment, 848: 157508.
[38]	TANG QISHENG, ZHANG JIHONG, FANG JIANGUANG, 2011. Shellfish and seaweed mariculture increase atmospheric CO₂ absorption by coastal ecosystems[J]. Marine Ecology Progress Series, 424: 97-104.

贝类	体型	干湿重转换系数/%			贝壳含碳率/%			软体组织含碳率/%
贝类	体型	龙口	牟平	长岛	龙口	牟平	长岛	龙口	牟平	长岛
牡蛎	大型	76.99	76.37	76.24	12.05	12.17	9.82	46.37	45.22	41.49
	中型	76.47	69.99	71.06	12.09	12.14	11.82	44.64	46.52	40.27
	小型	73.49	74.65	72.34	13.15	12.57	12.29	45.70	44.64	39.53
	平均值	75.65	73.63	73.21	12.43	12.29	11.31	45.57	45.46	40.43
扇贝	大型	53.34	45.61	54.70	14.33	15.13	12.80	41.93	46.83	37.87
	中型	53.36	47.27	52.21	14.28	14.40	13.05	41.88	45.67	36.13
	小型	60.83	49.34	56.26	13.26	14.00	12.84	43.69	43.48	36.97
	平均值	55.84	47.41	54.39	13.96	14.51	12.90	42.50	45.33	36.99
贻贝	平均值	-	56.41	53.95	-	17.17	15.94	-	43.33	38.35

贝类	体型	贝壳固碳能力/(g·a^-1·ind.^-1)			软体组织固碳能力(g·a^-1·ind.^-1)			总固碳能力(g·a^-1·ind.^-1)
贝类	体型	龙口	牟平	长岛	龙口	牟平	长岛	龙口	牟平	长岛
牡蛎	大型	16.12	15.14	13.82	0.52	0.59	0.35	16.64	15.73	14.17
	中型	7.92	5.98	5.83	0.39	0.50	0.37	8.31	6.48	6.20
	小型	3.23	3.69	2.74	0.14	0.19	0.13	3.37	3.88	2.87
	平均值	9.09	8.27	7.46	0.35	0.43	0.28	9.44	8.70	7.75
扇贝	大型	1.54	0.76	1.12	0.56	0.77	0.46	2.10	1.53	1.58
	中型	1.00	0.43	0.86	0.37	0.44	0.23	1.37	0.86	1.08
	小型	0.66	0.14	0.74	0.12	0.07	0.13	0.78	0.21	0.87
	平均值	1.07	0.44	0.91	0.35	0.43	0.27	1.42	0.87	1.17
贻贝	平均值	-	0.29	0.20	-	0.09	0.01	-	0.38	0.21

贝类	体型	软体组织质量分数实测值/%			软体组织质量分数标准参考值/%	贝壳质量分数实测值/%			贝壳质量分数标准参考值/%
贝类	体型	龙口	牟平	长岛	软体组织质量分数标准参考值/%	龙口	牟平	长岛	贝壳质量分数标准参考值/%
牡蛎	大型	4.36	4.98	3.34	6.14	95.64	95.02	96.66	93.86
	中型	5.73	7.47	6.93		94.27	92.53	93.07
	小型	5.69	5.41	6.65		94.31	94.59	93.35
	平均值	5.26	5.95	5.64		94.74	94.05	94.36
扇贝	大型	13.13	19.40	11.74	14.35	86.87	80.60	88.26	85.65
	中型	12.34	18.96	9.40		87.66	81.04	90.60
	小型	8.46	13.67	7.37		91.54	86.33	92.63
	平均值	11.31	17.34	9.50		88.69	82.66	90.50
贻贝	平均值	-	13.61	5.31	8.47	-	86.39	94.69	91.53

主要养殖贝类固碳能力评估及其影响因素——以烟台海域为例

Assessment of carbon sequestration capacity of cultivated bivalves and influencing factors in Yantai sea areas

RichHTML

PDF (PC)

赞

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

图/表 7

参考文献 38

相关文章 8

Metrics

本文评价

推荐阅读 0

[1]	王友绍, 韩广轩, 盛彦清, 程皓, 龙爱民. 滨海湿地生态修复与环境优化研究进展、战略机遇与挑战[J]. 热带海洋学报, 2025, 44(3): 1-13.
[2]	黄良民, 林强, 谭烨辉, 黄小平, 周林滨, 黄晖. 热带海洋特色生态系统恢复重构与保护思考^*[J]. 热带海洋学报, 2024, 43(6): 1-12.
[3]	谢勇, 王友绍, 张维仕. 红海榄肉桂酸-4-羟基化酶基因的克隆与表达分析[J]. 热带海洋学报, 2022, 41(6): 20-27.
[4]	王友绍. 全球气候变化对红树林生态系统的影响、挑战与机遇[J]. 热带海洋学报, 2021, 40(3): 1-14.
[5]	胡雪红, 张立, 周炎武, 何伟宏. 我国滨海湿地生态修复领域规范的现状与分析[J]. 热带海洋学报, 2020, 39(6): 131-139.
[6]	孙龙启, 林元烧, 陈俐骁, 曹文清, 郑连明. 北部湾北部生态系统结构与功能研究Ⅶ: 基于Ecopath模型的营养结构构建和关键种筛选[J]. 热带海洋学报, 2016, 35(4): 51-62.
[7]	李磊, 王云龙, 沈盎绿, 蒋玫, 黄厚见, 沈新强. 沉积物暴露条件下文蛤Meretrix meretrix 对重金属Cu、Pb的富集动力学研究[J]. 热带海洋学报, 2013, 32(1): 70-75.
[8]	江小桃, 谭烨辉, 柯志新, 黄良民. 投放双齿围沙蚕和马尾藻对养殖底泥上覆水氮、磷含量的影响[J]. 热带海洋学报, 2012, 31(4): 129-134.