青岛文昌鱼室内养殖群体和野生群体性腺发育的对比观察

doi:10.11978/j.issn.1009-5470.2013.04.012

热带海洋学报 ›› 2013, Vol. 32 ›› Issue (4): 78-83.doi: 10.11978/j.issn.1009-5470.2013.04.012cstr: 32234.14.j.issn.1009-5470.2013.04.012

青岛文昌鱼室内养殖群体和野生群体性腺发育的对比观察

马得友^{1, 2}, 尤锋¹, 文爱韵^{1, 2}, 谭训刚¹, 徐永立¹, 张立敬³, 张培军¹

1. 中国科学院海洋研究所实验海洋生物学重点实验室, 山东青岛 266071; 2. 中国科学院大学, 北京 100049; 3. 中国水产科学研究院黄海水产研究所海水养殖生物疾病控制与分子病理学实验室, 山东青岛 266071

收稿日期:2011-02-18 修回日期:2011-04-15 出版日期:2013-10-20 发布日期:2013-10-30
通讯作者: 尤锋。E-mail: youfeng@ms.qdio.ac.cn
作者简介:马得友(1984—), 男, 山东省日照市人, 硕士研究生, 主要从事文昌鱼和雌核发育牙鲆性腺发育研究。E-mail: mdy531@ 163.com
基金资助:
国家高技术研究发展计划项目(2008AA092602)

A comparison of gonad development between laboratory-reared and wild Branchiostoma japonicum

MA De-you^{1, 2}, YOU Feng¹, WEN Ai-yun^{1, 2}, TAN Xun-gang¹, XU Yong-li¹, ZHANG Li-jing³, ZHANG Pei-jun¹

1. Key Laboratory of Experimental Marine Biology, Institute of Oceanology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Qingdao 266071, China; 2. University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100049, China;; 3. Laboratory of disease control and molecular pathology of mariculture organisms, Yellow Sea Fisheries Research Institute, Chinese Academy of Fishery Sciences, Qingdao 266071, China

Received:2011-02-18 Revised:2011-04-15 Online:2013-10-20 Published:2013-10-30

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 本文采用组织学方法对比观察了青岛文昌鱼Branchiostoma japonicum室内养殖群体和野生群体在2009年11月底, 及2010年1月中、3月底、5月底及7月初的性腺发育情况。结果表明, 室内和野生群体的全长和体重在群体和个体水平上都没有显著差异(P>0.05), 2010年7月初两个群体的体重有明显的增加。室内雌文昌鱼卵巢在2010年5月全部处于Ⅳ期, 此时野生文昌鱼的卵巢仍有50%处于Ⅲ期; 室内雄文昌鱼精巢的发育在2010年3月快于野生文昌鱼, 其余月份室内和野生雌雄文昌鱼的性腺发育基本一致。这可能与2010年3月外海海水温度远低于室内海水温度有关。较外海环境更稳定的室内环境对文昌鱼的长期培育是否有利也是值得深入探究的。

关键词: 青岛文昌鱼, 室内养殖群体, 野生群体, 性腺发育, 组织学

Abstract: The gonad development of laboratory-reared and wild amphioxus (Branchiostoma japonicum) was observed respectively using histological method in Nov. 2009 and Jan., Mar., May, and Jul. of 2010. The results showed that there were no significant differences in total length and body weight among individuals in the two groups of samples (P>0.05), except for the body weights in the reproduction period of July 2010. The gonad development of laboratory amphioxus was basically consistent with that of the wild ones in most months. The ovaries of all laboratory-reared female amphioxus in May 2010 were in Phase Ⅳ, while half of the wild female amphioxus were still in Phase Ⅲ. In the same period, the testis development of laboratory-reared amphioxus was also faster than that of the wild ones. The reason could be the much lower temperature in natural seawater than in indoor seawater in that month. Relative to open sea complex environment, indoor condition is much more stable. However, whether long-term cultivating amphioxus under indoor condition is suitable or not needs further study.

Key words: Branchiostoma japonicum, laboratory-reared, wild, gonad development, histology

中图分类号:

Q492

马得友, 尤锋, 文爱韵, 谭训刚, 徐永立, 张立敬, 张培军. 青岛文昌鱼室内养殖群体和野生群体性腺发育的对比观察[J]. 热带海洋学报, 2013, 32(4): 78-83.

MA De-you, YOU Feng, WEN Ai-yun, TAN Xun-gang, XU Yong-li, ZHANG Li-jing, ZHANG Pei-jun. A comparison of gonad development between laboratory-reared and wild Branchiostoma japonicum[J]. Journal of Tropical Oceanography, 2013, 32(4): 78-83.

参考文献

[1]TATTERSALL W M. Notes on the classification and geographical distribution of the cephalochordata [J]. Proc Trans Liverpool Biol Soc, 1903, 17: 269-302.
[2]HENMI Y, YAMAGUCHI T. Biology of the Amphioxus Branchiostoma belcheri in the Ariake Sea, Japan.Ⅰ: Population Structure and growth[J]. Zoological Science, 2003, 20: 887-906.
[3]FUENTES M, SCHUBERT M, DALFO D, et al. Preliminary observations on the spawning conditions of the European amphioxus (Branchiostoma lanceolatum) in captivity [J]. Journal of experimental zoology, 2004, 302B(4): 384-391.
[4]王义权, 方少华. 文昌鱼分类学研究及展望[J]. 动物学研究, 2005, 26(6): 666-672.
[5]SHIMELD S M, HOLLAND N D. Amphioxus molecular biology: insights into vertebrate evolution and developmental Mechanisms [J]. Canadian Journal Zoology, 2005, 83(1): 90-100.
[6]SCHUBERT M, ESCRIVA H, XAVIER-NETO J, et al. Amphioxus and tunicates as evolutionary model systems [J]. Trends in Ecology and Evolution, 2006, 21(5): 269-277.
[7]张士璀, 郭斌, 梁宇君. 我国文昌鱼研究50年[J] . 生命科学, 2008, 20 (1): 64-68.
[8]NOHARA M, NISHIDA M, MANTHAEITRA V, et al. Ancient phylogenetic separation between Pacific and Atlantic cephalochordates as revealed by mitochondrial genome analysis [J]. Zoological Science, 2004, 21(2): 203-210.
[9]NISHIKAWA T. Brief review of taxonomic studies of Japanese lancelets [J]. Acta Anat Nippon, 1992, 67: 803.
[10]方水强. 文昌鱼生态习性及其资源的保护[J]. 动物学杂志, 1978, 22: 41-45.
[11]FRICK J E, RUPPERT E E. Primordial germ cells and oocytes of Branchiostoma virginiae (Cephalochordata, Acrania) are flagellated epithelial cells: Relationship between epithelial and primary egg polarity [J]. Zygote, 1997, 5: 139-151.
[12]KUBOKAWA K, MIZUTA T, MORISAWA M, et al. Gonadal state of wild amphioxus populations and spawning success in captive conditions during the breeding period in Japan [J]. Zoological Science, 2003, 20(7): 889-895.
[13]方永强, 齐襄, 梁苹, 等. 厦门文昌鱼性腺发育的周年变化[J]. 海洋学报, 1990, 12(5): 631-637.
[14]方永强, 梁苹, 洪桂英. 光照周期对文昌鱼生殖细胞发生和性腺生长的影响[J]. 动物学报, 1989, 35(4): 438-439.
[15]林加涵, 方永强, 刘建, 等. 不同水温对文昌鱼性腺发育的影响[J]. 台湾海峡, 1996, 15(2): 170-174.
[16]宋裕昌, 许梅青. 青岛文昌鱼的繁殖生物学-Ⅰ. 卵巢和卵母细胞的发育的观察[J]. 海洋科学, 1989, 4: 50-54.
[17]张士璀, 朱锦天, 贾翠红, 等. 成体文昌鱼实验室培养产卵、排精及其受精卵早期发育的观察[J]. 海洋科学集刊, 2000, 42: 74-76.
[18]ZHANG S C, ZHU J T, LI G R, et al. Reproduction of the laboratory-maintained lancelet Branchiostoma belcheri tsingtaunese [J]. Ophelia, 2001, 54(2): 115-118.
[19]FUENTES M, BENITO E, BERTRAND S, et al. Insights into spawning behavior and development of the european amphioxus(Branchiostoma lanceolatum) [J]. Journal of experimental zoology, 2007, 308B(4): 484-493.
[20]YAMAGUCHI T, HENMI Y. Biology of the Amphioxus, Branchiostoma belcheri in the Ariake Sea, Japan II. Reproduction [J]. Zoological Society, 2003, 20(7): 907-918.
[21]KUBOKAWA K, MIZUTA T, MORISAWA M, et al. Gonadal state of wild amphioxus populations and spawning success in captive conditions during the breeding period in Japan [J] Zoological Science, 2003, 20(7): 889-895.
[22]YASUI K, URATA M, YAMAGUCHI N, et al. Laboratory Culture of the Oriental Lancelet Branchiostoma belcheri [J]. Zoological Science, 2007, 24(5): 514-520.
[23]吴贤汉, 张世璀, 王永元, 等. 青岛文昌鱼的生活史、年龄、生长和死亡研究[J]. 海洋与湖沼, 1995, 26(2): 175-178.
[24]张秋金. 厦门海域文昌鱼属Branchiostoma的分类及2种文昌鱼的实验室连续繁育[D]. 厦门: 厦门大学, 2007: 74-76.
[25]马得友, 尤锋, 文爱韵, 等. 室内培育条件下青岛文昌鱼性腺的年周期发育[J]. 海洋科学, 2010, 34(11): 6-13.
[26]COWDEN R R. Cytochemical studies of oocyte growth in the lancelet Branchiostoma caribaeum [J]. Zeitschrift für Zellforschung, 1963, 60: 399-408.
[27]尹家胜, 邱岭泉, 徐伟, 等. 水温变化对黑龙江野鲤繁殖的影响[J]. 上海水产大学学报, 2002, 11(3): 253-258.
[28]木云雷, 刘悦, 王鉴, 等. 水温和光照对牙鲆亲鱼性腺成熟和产卵的影响[J]. 大连水产学院学报, 1999, 14(2): 62-65.
[29]MOORE J A. Temperature tolerance and areas of development in the eggs of Amphibia [J]. Ecology, 1939, 20(4): 459-478.
[30]王培潮. 杭州四种蜥蜴的生态研究[J]. 动物学报, 1966, 18(2): 170-185.

青岛文昌鱼室内养殖群体和野生群体性腺发育的对比观察

A comparison of gonad development between laboratory-reared and wild Branchiostoma japonicum

PDF (PC)

赞

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献

相关文章 9

Metrics

本文评价

推荐阅读 0

[1]	陈灵珍, 秦耿, 王信, 刘雅莉, 肖旺红, 林强. 线纹海马(Hippocampus erectus)性腺特异性结构与生殖细胞发育特征研究 ^*[J]. 热带海洋学报, 2020, 39(6): 93-102.
[2]	杨佳喆, 齐闯, 徐善良. 褐菖鲉仔、稚鱼消化系统发育的组织学观察[J]. 热带海洋学报, 2019, 38(2): 58-66.
[3]	曹潇, 孙敏, 朱亮华, 张鼎元, 徐善良. 黑鱾消化系统的形态学及组织学研究^*[J]. 热带海洋学报, 2018, 37(1): 20-26.
[4]	宋悦凡, 曲翊, 曹旭鹏, 汪秋宽, 张卫. 南海小轴海绵的组织结构和细胞特征[J]. 热带海洋学报, 2016, 35(4): 71-81.
[5]	翁朝红, 谢仰杰, 肖志群, 王艺磊. 福建和广东南部葡萄牙牡蛎养殖群体和野生群体遗传多样性分析[J]. 热带海洋学报, 2016, 35(3): 94-98.
[6]	倪娜, 柳学周徐永江, 赵明, 曲建忠. 雌性条斑星鲽脑垂体组织学观察[J]. 热带海洋学报, 2012, 31(6): 97-102.
[7]	区又君廖光勇, 李加儿. 波纹唇鱼消化道的形态学和组织学[J]. 热带海洋学报, 2012, 31(6): 83-89.
[8]	邹志华,张子平,王艺磊,陈锦民,贾锡伟,王淑红,林鹏. 锯缘青蟹性腺发育与性别分化相关组织混合线性化cDNA文库构建及EST初步分析[J]. 热带海洋学报, 2009, 28(6): 88-94.
[9]	曹伏君. 青弹涂鱼卵巢发育的组织学研究[J]. 热带海洋学报, 2009, 28(6): 123-129.