[已撤稿] 三亚珊瑚礁珊瑚藻种类及其空间特征与环境因子的关系

doi:10.11978/2018084

热带海洋学报 ›› 2019, Vol. 38 ›› Issue (3): 79-88.doi: 10.11978/2018084CSTR: 32234.14.2018084

[已撤稿] 三亚珊瑚礁珊瑚藻种类及其空间特征与环境因子的关系

雷新明^1,²,黄晖^1,^2,³(),练健生^1,²,张浴阳^1,²,杨剑辉¹

^1. 中国科学院南海海洋研究所, 中国科学院热带海洋生物资源与生态重点实验室, 广东广州 510301
^2. 广东省应用海洋生物学重点实验室, 广东广州 510301
^3. 中国科学院海南热带海洋生物实验站, 海南三亚 572000

收稿日期:2018-08-16 修回日期:2018-09-27 出版日期:2019-05-20 发布日期:2019-06-17
通讯作者: 黄晖
作者简介:雷新明(1981—), 男, 河南省潢川县人, 博士, 主要从事珊瑚礁生态学研究。E-mail:leixm@scsio.ac.cn
基金资助:
国家自然科学基金(41306144);国家自然科学基金(41676150);国家重点研发计划(2017YFC0506301);中国科学院战略性先导科技专项(A类)(XDA13020402);广东省省级科技计划项目(2017B0303014052)

[RETRACTED] Species composition of coralline algae and its spatial characteristics related to environmental factors in Sanya coral reefs, China

Xinming LEI^1,²,Hui HUANG^1,^2,³(),Jiansheng LIAN^1,²,Yuyang ZHANG^1,²,Jianhui YANG¹

^1. Key Laboratory of Tropical Marine Bio-resources and Ecology, South China Sea Institute of Oceanology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Guangzhou 510301, China
^2. Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Applied Marine Biology, Guangzhou 510301
^3. CAS Tropical Marine Biological Research Station in Hainan, South China Sea Institute of Oceanology, Sanya 572000, China

Received:2018-08-16 Revised:2018-09-27 Online:2019-05-20 Published:2019-06-17
Contact: Hui HUANG
Supported by:
National Natural Science Foundation of China(41306144);National Natural Science Foundation of China(41676150);National Key Research and Development Plan(2017YFC0506301);Strategic Priority Research Program of the Chinese Academy of Sciences(XDA13020402);Science and Technology Planning Project of Guangdong Province, China(2017B0303014052)

摘要/Abstract

摘要：

珊瑚藻是珊瑚礁生态系统中重要的功能性群体。2010年通过水肺潜水分析了三亚珊瑚礁区的珊瑚藻种类组成和丰度, 以及群落空间特征与环境因子的关系。共鉴定出3科10属25种珊瑚藻, 其中珊瑚藻科占优势地位。三亚珊瑚礁区的珊瑚藻优势种分别为叉节藻Amphiroa ephedraea、拟中叶藻Mesophyllum simulans、串胞新角石藻Neogoniolithon fosliei、中叶藻M. mesomorphum、圆锥呼叶藻Pneophyllum conicum、孔石藻Porolithon onkodes和布氏水石藻Hydrolithon boergesenii。基于多元统计的分析结果, 将调查采样站位分为近岸型和离岸型2个主要集群, 其中近岸型的珊瑚藻种类以浊度、沉积速率(0~63μm)和悬浮物耐受种类为主, 离岸型则以光依赖-沉积物敏感种类为主。以珊瑚藻种类组成和丰度为基础的群落相似性分析结果表明, 其空间变异处于显著性水平。生物与非生物变量的相关分析结果表明, 最佳两变量组合(浊度和盐度)显著影响三亚珊瑚礁区2种类型调查站位中的珊瑚藻集合。在同一个研究站位, 因受干扰程度不同, 深水处的珊瑚藻的覆盖率比浅水处高。分析结果表明, 在三亚独特的珊瑚礁区中, 自然或人为的物理干扰因素都对调节珊瑚藻群落结构非常重要。

撤稿声明： http://www.jto.ac.cn/CN/10.11978/2018084R

关键词: 珊瑚藻, 种类组成, 空间特征, 环境因子, 三亚珊瑚礁

Abstract:

Coralline algae are important functional group in the coral reef ecosystem. This study was carried out by a series of line transects run underwater with SCUBA apparatus from the reef flat to a depth of 9 m in each of the 11 research stations within the Sanya Coral Reefs in 2010. Among the inshore sites and the offshore sites of Sanya reefs, species composition and abundance of coralline algae were examined in relation to environmental factors. A total of 25 species belonging to three families and 10 genuses were identified, with the family Corallinaceae dominated in the study area. The eight dominant species were Amphiroa ephedraea, Mesophyllum simulans, Neogoniolithon fosliei, M. mesomorphum, Pneophyllum conicum, Porolithon onkodes, and Hydrolithon boergesenii. The sampling stations were divided into inshore type and offshore type based on the results of multivariate statistical analysis. The coralline algae species at the inshore sites were mainly turbidity, deposition rate (0~63 μm) and suspended solids (SS) tolerance species, while the species at the offshore sites were mainly light-dependent and sediment sensitive species. The results of community similarity analysis based on species composition and abundance of coralline algae showed the significant spatial variability. The correlation analysis between biotic and abiotic variables indicated that the best 2-variable combination (turbidity and salinity) showed a significant effect on the pattern of coralline algae assemblages between the two types of research sites in Sanya reefs. The living cover of coralline algae showed that deeper water is higher than that in shallow water due to the different degree of disturbance at the same study sites. This result suggests that physical disturbance, either natural or man-made, is a more important factor in regulating the coralline algae community structure within the coral reef distinct zone of Sanya.

RETRACTED： http://www.jto.ac.cn/CN/10.11978/2018084R

Key words: Coralline algae, species composition, spatial characteristics, environmental factors, Sanya reefs

中图分类号:

Q948.8

雷新明, 黄晖, 练健生, 张浴阳, 杨剑辉. [已撤稿] 三亚珊瑚礁珊瑚藻种类及其空间特征与环境因子的关系[J]. 热带海洋学报, 2019, 38(3): 79-88.

Xinming LEI, Hui HUANG, Jiansheng LIAN, Yuyang ZHANG, Jianhui YANG. [RETRACTED] Species composition of coralline algae and its spatial characteristics related to environmental factors in Sanya coral reefs, China[J]. Journal of Tropical Oceanography, 2019, 38(3): 79-88.

图/表 8

图1

表1

表2

图2

表3

图3

图4

表4

参考文献 39

[1]	李秀保 , 2011. 三亚造礁石珊瑚群落组成、时空分布及主要影响因子识别研究[D]. 北京: 中国科学院研究生院: 1-115.
	LI XIUBAO . 2011. Identification of major factors influencing the composition, spatial and temporal variation of scleractinian coral community in Sanya China[D]. Beijing: Graduate School of the Chinese Academy of Sciences: 1-115 (in Chinese with English abstract).
[2]	练健生, 黄晖, 黄良民 , 等, 2010. 三亚珊瑚礁及其生物多样性[M]. 北京: 海洋出版社: 1-106.
	LIAN JIANSHENG, HUANG HUI, HUANG LIANGMIN , et al, 2010. Coral reef and its biodiversity of Sanya[M]. Beijing: China Ocean Press: 1-106(in Chinese).
[3]	邢帅, 谭烨辉, 周林滨 , 等, 2012. 水体浑浊度对不同造礁石珊瑚种类共生虫黄藻的影响[J]. 科学通报, 57(5):348-354. doi: 10.1360/972011-1184
	XING SHUAI, TAN YEHUI, ZHOU LINBIN , et al, 2012. Effects of water turbidity on the symbiotic zooxanthella of hermatypic corals[J]. Chinese Science Bulletin, 57(5):348-354 (in Chinese with English abstract). doi: 10.1360/972011-1184
[4]	徐兆礼, 陈亚瞿 , 1989. 东黄海秋季浮游动物优势种聚集强度与鲐鲹渔场的关系[J]. 生态学杂志, 8(4):13-15.
	Xu ZHAOLI, CHEN YAQU , 1989. Aggregated intensity of dominant species of Zooplankton in Autumn in the East China Sea and Yellow Sea[J]. Journal of Ecology, 8(4):13-15 (in Chinese with English abstract).
[5]	张德瑞, 周锦华 , 1978. 西沙群岛珊瑚藻科的研究Ⅰ[J]. 海洋科学集刊, 12:17-23.
	ZHANG DERUI, ZHOU JINHUA , 1978. Studies on the Corallinaceae of the Xisha islands, Guangdong Province, China. Ⅰ[J]. Studia Marina Sinica, 12:17-23 (in Chinese with English abstract).
[6]	ADEY W H, TOWNSEND R A, BOYKINS W T , 1982. The crustose coralline algae (Rhodophyta: Corallinaceae) of the Hawaiian Islands[M]. Washington: Smithsonian Institution Press: 1-74.
[7]	ANTHONY K R N, KLINE D I, DIAZ-PULIDO G , et al, 2008. Ocean acidification causes bleaching and productivity loss in coral reef builders[J]. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 105(45):17442-17446. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0804478105
[8]	BARNES D J, CHALKER B E , 1990. Calcification and photosynbook in reef-building corals and algae[M] // DUBINSKY Z. Ecosystems of the world. Amsterdam, the Netherlands: Elsevier.
[9]	BRAGA J C, BOSENCE D W J, STENECK R S , 1993. New anatomical characters in fossil coralline algae and their taxonomic implications[J]. Palaeontology, 36:535-547.
[10]	BRODIE J, ZUCCARELLO G C , 2007. Systematics of the species-rich algae: Red algal classification, phylogeny and speciation[M] //HODKINSON R T, PARNELL J, WALDREN S. The taxonomy and systematics of large and species-rich taxa: building and using the tree of life. Boca Raton: CRC Press: 323-336.
[11]	CARAGNANO A, COLOMBO F, RODONDI G , et al, 2009. 3-D distribution of nongeniculate corallinales: a case study from a reef crest of South Sinai (Red Sea, Egypt)[J]. Coral Reefs, 28(4):881-891. doi: 10.1007/s00338-009-0524-6
[12]	CLARKE K R, GORLEY R N , 2006a. Primer V6: user manual/tutorial[M]. Plymouth: Primer-E :1-126.
[13]	CLARKE K R, WARWICK R M , 2006b. Change in marine communities: an approach to statistical analysis and interpretation[M]. Plymouth: PRIMER-E.
[14]	FABRICIUS K, DE’ATH G , 2001. Environmental factors associated with the spatial distribution of crustose coralline algae on the Great Barrier Reef[J]. Coral Reefs, 19(4):303-309. doi: 10.1007/s003380000120
[15]	FARR T, BROOM J, HART D , et al, 2009. Common coralline algae of northern New Zealand: an identification guide[M]. Wellington: NIWA:1-125.
[16]	GARBARY D J, JOHANSEN H W , 1982. Scanning electron microscopy of Corallina and Haliptilon (Corallinaceae, Rhodophyta): surface features and their taxonomic implications[J]. Journal of Phycology, 18(2):211-219. doi: 10.1111/jpy.1982.18.issue-2
[17]	HARVEY A S, WOELKERLING W J , 2007. A guide to nongeniculate coralline red algal (Corallinales, Rhodophyta) rhodolith identification[J]. Ciencias Marinas, 33(4):411-426. doi: 10.7773/cm
[18]	HEYWARD A J, NEGRI A P , 1999. Natural inducers for coral larval metamorphosis[J]. Coral Reefs, 18(3):273-279. doi: 10.1007/s003380050193
[19]	HUANG LIANGMIN, TAN YEHUI, SONG XINGYU , et al, 2003. The status of the ecological environment and a proposed protection strategy in Sanya Bay, Hainan Island, China[J]. Marine Pollution Bulletin, 47(1-6):180-186. doi: 10.1016/S0025-326X(03)00070-5
[20]	IRYU Y, MATSUDA S, 1988. Depth distribution, abundance and species assemblages of nonarticulated coralline algae in the Ryukyu Islands, southwestern Japan [C]//Proceedings of the 6th international coral reef symposium. Townsville, Sixth International Coral Reef Symposium Executive Committee, 3:101-106.
[21]	KLUMPP D W, MCKINNON A D , 1992. Community structure, biomass and productivity of epilithic algal communities on the great barrier reef: dynamics at different spatial scales[J]. Marine Ecology Progress Series, 86:77-89. doi: 10.3354/meps086077
[22]	KUFFNER I B, ANDERSSON A J, JOKIEL P L , et al, 2008. Decreased abundance of crustose coralline algae due to ocean acidification[J]. Nature Geoscience, 1(2):114-117.
[23]	LASKER H R, KIM K , 1996. Larval development and settlement behavior of the gorgonian coral Plexaura kuna (Lasker, Kim and Coffroth)[J]. Journal of Experimental Marine Biology and Ecology, 207(1-2):161-175. doi: 10.1016/S0022-0981(96)02625-1
[24]	LITTLER D S, LITTLER M M , 2003. South Pacific reef plants: a divers' guide to the plant life of South Pacific coral reefs[M]. Washington, D.C.: Offshore Graphics: 1-331.
[25]	LITTLER M M, LITTLER D S , 1984. Models of tropical reef biogenesis: the contribution of algae[M] //ROUND F E, CHAPMAN D J. Progress in phycological research. Amsterdam: Elsevier Biomedical Press, 3:323-364.
[26]	MAUDSLEY B , 1990. Defenders of the reef[J]. New Scientist, 126(1714):52-56.
[27]	MINTON D, CONKLIN E, COUCH C S , et al, 2011. Survey of the coral reefs of Pelekane Bay[R]. Honolulu: The Nature Conservancy: 1-69.
[28]	OLIVER R L, MITROVIC S M, REES C , 2010. Influence of salinity on light conditions and phytoplankton growth in a turbid river[J]. River Research and Applications, 26(7):894-903. doi: 10.1002/rra.v26:7
[29]	STELLER D L, FOSTER M S . 1995. Environmental factors influencing distribution and morphology of rhodoliths in Bahía Concepción, B.C.S., México[J]. Journal of Experimental Marine Biology and Ecology, 194(2):201-212. doi: 10.1016/0022-0981(95)00086-0
[30]	STENECK R S, TESTA V, 1997. Are calcareous algae important to reefs today or in the past? [C]// Proceedings of 8th International coral reef symposium. Panama: Balboa, 1:685-688.
[31]	SZMANT A M , 2001. Introduction to the special issue of Coral Reefs on “Coral Reef Algal Community Dynamics” - Why are coral reefs world-wide becoming overgrown by algae? ‘Algae, algae everywhere, and nowhere a bite to eat!’[J]. Coral Reefs, 19(4):299-302. doi: 10.1007/s003380000130
[32]	TSENG C K , 1983. Common seaweeds of China[M]. Beijing: Science Press: 1-316.
[33]	VAN DER MEIJ S E T, SUHAR SONO, HOEKSEMA B W , 2010. Long-term changes in coral assemblages under natural and anthropogenic stress in Jakarta Bay (1920-2005)[J]. Marine Pollution Bulletin, 60(9):1442-1454. doi: 10.1016/j.marpolbul.2010.05.011
[34]	VIDAL R, MENESES I, SMITH M , 2003. Molecular genetic identification of crustose representatives of the order Corallinales (Rhodophyta) in Chile[J]. Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution, 28(3):404-419. doi: 10.1016/S1055-7903(03)00123-4
[35]	WALKER D I, ORMOND R F G , 1982. Coral Death from Sewage and Phosphate Pollution at Aqaba, Red Sea[J]. Marine Pollution Bulletin, 13(1):21-25. doi: 10.1016/0025-326X(82)90492-1
[36]	WILLIAMS E A, CRAIGIE A, YEATES A , et al, 2008. Articulated coralline algae of the genus Amphiroa are highly effective natural inducers of settlement in the tropical abalone Haliotis asinina[J]. Biological Bulletin, 215(1):98-107. doi: 10.2307/25470687
[37]	WILSON S, BLAKE C, BERGES J A , et al, 2004. Environmental tolerances of free-living coralline algae (maerl): implications for European marine conservation[J]. Biological Conservation, 120(2):279-289. doi: 10.1016/j.biocon.2004.03.001
[38]	WOELKERLING W J , 1988. The coralline red algae: an analysis of the genera and subfamilies of nongeniculate corallinaceae[M]. Oxford: Oxford University Press: 1-127.
[39]	WOELKERLING W J, HARVEY A , 1993. An account of southern Australian species of Mesophyllum (Corallinaceae, Rhodophyta)[J]. Australian Systematic Botany, 6(6):571-673. doi: 10.1071/sb9930571

珊瑚藻种类	站位
珊瑚藻种类	西岛	东岛	小洲岛	鹿回头	小东海	大东海	野猪岛	东排	西排	太阳湾	神岛
叉节藻Amphiroa ephedraea			+		+	+	-			+	+
宽扁叉节藻A. anceps							+			+
美丽叉节藻 A. beauvoisii						+
矮型石叶藻Lithophyllum pygmaeum							+		+
微凹石叶藻L. kotschyanum*							+		+
三叉新角石藻Neogoniolithon trichotomum									+
太平洋新角石藻N. pacificum									+		+
串胞新角石藻N. fosliei	+	+	+	+		+	+			+	+
变胞新角石藻N. variabile	+				+	+	+
锥窝新角石藻N. conicum	+				+	+	+
巨大新角石藻N. megalocystum					+
撒切尔新角石藻 N. setchellii		+			+
小石孔藻Lithoporella melobesioides*			+				+		+	+
太平洋小石孔藻L. pacifica*		+						+	+
孔石藻Porolithon onkodes*	+					+			+	+
水石藻Hydrolithon reinboldii*		+	+	+	+	+	+		+	+	+
布氏水石藻H. boergesenii	+	+	+			+	+	+	+
圆锥呼叶藻Pneophyllum conicum	+	+	+		+
太平洋石枝藻Lithothamnion pacificum		+	+	+	+
中间石枝藻L. intermedium					+						+
尖顶石枝藻L. aculeiferum		+
石枝藻 Lithothamnion sp.				+
中叶藻Mesophyllum mesomorphum*	+	+	+	+	+		+		+		+
拟中叶藻M. simulans*	+	+	+	+	+				+		+
孢石藻Sporolithon erythraeum*	+			+		+			+

站位	珊瑚藻所占比例/%
站位	珊瑚藻科	混石藻科	孢石藻科
西岛	70.59	11.76	17.65
东岛	50	50	0
小洲岛	80.95	19.05	0
鹿回头	15	75	10
小东海	67.65	32.35	0
大东海	95.24	0	4.76
神岛	72.22	27.78	0
太阳湾	77.27	18.18	4.55
西排	77.27	18.18	4.55
东排	100	0	0
野猪岛	95.83	4.17	0

站位	珊瑚藻覆盖率/%
站位	3m	6m	9m
西岛	7.37	4.26	4.52
东岛	15.76	29.64	23.09
小洲岛	15.08	4.61
鹿回头	6.97	5.06
小东海	23.27	12.73	11.61
大东海	15.45	8.95
神岛	2.35	0.22
太阳湾	12.5	5.95	3.78
西排	38.45	27.54	7.25
东排	13.91	20.32	7.40
野猪岛	11.20	1.60

		轴1	轴2	总变异
环境因子与排序轴的相关系数	浊度	-0.699	0.158
	光照	0.625	-0.149
	总悬浮物含量	-0.308	-0.060
	沉积速率(0~63μm)	-0.835	0.131
	沉积速率(63~2000μm)	0.728	0.077
排序轴的统计结果	特征根	0.353	0.205
	物种-环境相关性	0.935	0.835
	累计变异百分数
	物种数据	20.7	32.8
	物种-环境数据	41.4	65.5
	特征根之和			1.705
	典型特征根之和			0.853

[已撤稿] 三亚珊瑚礁珊瑚藻种类及其空间特征与环境因子的关系

[RETRACTED] Species composition of coralline algae and its spatial characteristics related to environmental factors in Sanya coral reefs, China

RichHTML

PDF (PC)

赞

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

图/表 8

参考文献 39

相关文章 15

Metrics

本文评价

推荐阅读 0

[1]	罗勇, 黄林韬, 杨剑辉, 练健生, 刘骋跃, 江雷, 梁宇娴, 陈伦举, 雷新明, 刘胜, 黄晖. 海南临高红牌—马袅沿岸海域造礁石珊瑚群落结构及其环境影响因子[J]. 热带海洋学报, 2024, 43(3): 72-86.
[2]	张浴阳, 刘骋跃, 俞晓磊, 罗勇, 周天成, 练健生, 黄晖. 三亚凤凰岛造礁石珊瑚迁移效果研究^*[J]. 热带海洋学报, 2024, 43(3): 177-186.
[3]	马文刚, 夏景全, 魏一凡, 尹洪洋, 覃乐政, 刘相波, 胡雪晴, 许强, 李秀保, 王爱民. 三亚蜈支洲岛海洋牧场近岛区底表大型底栖动物群落结构及评价[J]. 热带海洋学报, 2022, 41(3): 135-146.
[4]	黄建中, 魏宇衡, 顾志峰, 吴川良, 许强, 王爱民, 李秀保. 海南西岛珊瑚群落变化及其影响因素 ^*[J]. 热带海洋学报, 2020, 39(6): 103-113.
[5]	何思璇,何斌源. 防城河口湾鱼类群落结构及其与环境因子关系研究[J]. 热带海洋学报, 2019, 38(5): 86-97.
[6]	雷新明,黄晖,练健生,MCCOOKLaurenceJ. 中国珊瑚藻的多样性及分布研究现状[J]. 热带海洋学报, 2019, 38(4): 30-40.
[7]	毋浩亮, 胡松. 环境因子对南海土台风“蝴蝶”与“银河”强度的影响^*[J]. 热带海洋学报, 2018, 37(3): 26-34.
[8]	崔磊, 吕颂辉, 董悦镭, 郜星晨, 李丽, 刘丰华, 岑竞仪. 围填海工程对淇澳岛附近水域环境因子与生物群落的影响[J]. 热带海洋学报, 2017, 36(2): 96-105.
[9]	吴风霞, 黄洪辉, 黄建荣, 刘华雪. 春季白沙湾浮游纤毛虫群落结构及其与环境因子的关系[J]. 热带海洋学报, 2016, 35(3): 79-86.
[10]	肖瑜璋, 王蓉, 郑琰晶, 何薇. 珠江口鱼类浮游生物种类组成与数量分布[J]. 热带海洋学报, 2013, 32(6): 80-87.
[11]	刘俏, 龙丽娟. 环境因子对慢原甲藻(Prorocentrum rhathymum)生长的影响[J]. 热带海洋学报, 2013, 32(3): 93-100.
[12]	李海平 ,鄢庆枇 ,徐晓津 ,苏永全 ,覃映雪 . 哈维氏弧菌生物被膜体外模型的建立及成膜特性研究[J]. 热带海洋学报, 2011, 30(3): 99-104.
[13]	刘文广 ,李琪 ,高凤祥 ,于瑞海 ,孔令峰 . 长牡蛎繁殖周期、生化成分的季节变化与环境因子的关系[J]. 热带海洋学报, 2011, 30(3): 88-93.
[14]	姜发军,胡章立,胡超群. 大鹏湾浮游细菌时空分布与环境因子的关系[J]. 热带海洋学报, 2011, 30(1): 96-100.
[15]	孙大伟,欧林坚,齐雨藻,陈菊芳. 广东大亚湾中肋骨条藻种群动态及其与环境因子的相关性分析[J]. 热带海洋学报, 2010, 29(6): 46-50.