红海与加利福尼亚湾初始扩张系统的热状态差异

doi:10.11978/2023032

热带海洋学报 ›› 2023, Vol. 42 ›› Issue (6): 74-88.doi: 10.11978/2023032CSTR: 32234.14.2023032

红海与加利福尼亚湾初始扩张系统的热状态差异

徐柳娜¹(), 李春峰¹^,²(), 黄亮¹, 朱塽¹, 尹义红³

1.浙江大学海洋科学系, 浙江舟山 316021
2.浙江大学海南研究院, 海南三亚 572025
3.山东华坤自然资源数字产业集团, 山东济南 250014

收稿日期:2023-03-10 修回日期:2023-04-28 出版日期:2023-11-10 发布日期:2023-11-28
作者简介:
徐柳娜(1996—), 女, 山东省烟台市人, 硕士研究生, 从事海洋地球物理研究。email: 22034129@zju.edu.cn
基金资助:
国家自然科学基金项目(91858213); 国家自然科学基金项目(42176055); 海南省自然科学基金(421CXTD441); 舟山市校合作项目(2019C81058)

Contrasting thermal states of the initial spreading systems between the Red Sea and the Gulf of California

XU Liuna¹(), LI Chunfeng¹^,²(), HUANG Liang¹, ZHU Shuang¹, YIN Yihong³

1. Department of Marine Science, Zhejiang University, Zhoushan 316021, China
2. Hainan Institute, Zhejiang University, Sanya 572025, China
3. Shandong Huakun Natural Resources Digital Industry Group, Jinan 250014, China

Received:2023-03-10 Revised:2023-04-28 Online:2023-11-10 Published:2023-11-28
Supported by:
National Natural Science Foundation of China(91858213); National Natural Science Foundation of China(42176055); Natural Science Foundation of Hainan Province, China(421CXTD441); Zhejiang University Cooperation Project with Zhoushan city(2019C81058)

摘要/Abstract

摘要：

红海与加利福尼亚湾同处于由大陆裂谷向初始海底扩张的过渡阶段, 但具有显著不同的构造背景与演化特征。本文基于磁异常数据, 利用基于傅里叶变换和小波变换的质心法, 计算得到了红海和加利福尼亚湾的居里面深度, 对比发现二者热状态存在显著差异, 不同方法的计算结果均显示加利福尼亚湾的居里面明显深于红海的居里面。红海扩张中心相对连续, 岩浆活动较为活跃, 而加利福尼亚湾扩张中心区域广泛发育了错开扩张脊的转换断层, 并且扩张中心处热液活动强烈, 加速了该区域的热对流和热损耗。此外, 扩张速率与热状态和热液活动之间存在着明显的耦合关系。加利福尼亚湾的扩张速率是红海的两倍多, 较快的扩张速率与热液活动正相关, 较强的热液活动加速热损耗而加深居里面, 也是引起加利福尼亚湾居里面比红海居里面深的原因之一。

关键词: 红海, 加利福尼亚湾, 居里面, 热状态, 小波变换, 傅里叶变换, 热流, 热液活动

Abstract:

Although both the Red Sea and the Gulf of California are in the transitional stage from continental rifting to initial seafloor spreading, their tectonic backgrounds and evolutionary features are vastly different. To investigate their geothermal differences, curie-point depths in the Red Sea and the Gulf of California are estimated from magnetic anomalies using the centroid method based on both Fourier and wavelet transform. Our results reveal significant differences in the thermal states between the Red Sea and the Gulf of California. Curie depths in the Gulf of California are evidently deeper than those in the Red Sea. The spreading center of the Red Sea is relatively continuous and has active magmatic activity, whereas the spreading center of the Gulf of California is staggered by extensively developed transform faults and has strong localized hydrothermal activity that accelerates the thermal convection and loss of heat in this region. In addition, the spreading rate is highly coupled with the thermal state and hydrothermal activity in the spreading center. The spreading rate in the Gulf of California more than twice that of the Red Sea, further supporting stronger hydrothermal activity and deeper Curie depths in the Gulf of California than in the Red Sea.

Key words: Red Sea, Gulf of California, Curie point depth, thermal state, wavelet transform, Fourier transform, heat flow, hydrothermal activity

徐柳娜, 李春峰, 黄亮, 朱塽, 尹义红. 红海与加利福尼亚湾初始扩张系统的热状态差异[J]. 热带海洋学报, 2023, 42(6): 74-88.

XU Liuna, LI Chunfeng, HUANG Liang, ZHU Shuang, YIN Yihong. Contrasting thermal states of the initial spreading systems between the Red Sea and the Gulf of California[J]. Journal of Tropical Oceanography, 2023, 42(6): 74-88.

图/表 15

图1

图2

图3

表1

图4

图5

表2

图6

图7

图8

图9

图10

图11

图12

图13

参考文献 66

[1]	宋珏琛, 李江海, 冯博, 2021. 慢速-超慢速扩张洋中脊热液活动及其机理[J]. 地质学报, 95(8): 2273-2283.
	SONG JUECHEN, LI JIANGHAI, FENG BO, 2021. Hydrothermal activity and mechanism along slow- and ultraslow- spreading mid-ocean ridges[J]. Acta Geologica Sinica, 95(8): 2273-2283 (in Chinese with English abstract).
[2]	徐行, 姚永坚, 彭登, 等, 2018. 南海西南次海盆的地热流特征与分析[J]. 地球物理学报, 61(7): 2915-2925.
	XU XING, YAO YONGJIAN, PENG DENG, et al, 2018. The characteristics and analysis of heat flow in the Southwest sub-basin of South China Sea[J]. Chinese Journal of Geophysics, 61(7): 2915-2925 (in Chinese with English abstract).
[3]	王淑杰, 翟世奎, 于增慧, 等, 2018. 关于现代海底热液活动系统模式的思考[J]. 地球科学, 43(3): 835-850.
	WANG SHUJIE, ZHAI SHIKUI, YU ZENGHUI, et al, 2018. Reflections on model of modern seafloor hydrothermal system[J]. Journal of Earth Science, 43(3): 835-850 (in Chinese with English abstract).
[4]	ABOUD E, ALQAHTANI F, ABDULFARRAJ M, et al, 2023. Geothermal imaging of the Saudi Cross-Border City of NEOM deduced from magnetic data[J]. Sustainability, 15(5): 4549. doi: 10.3390/su15054549
[5]	ABOUD E, ALOTAIBI A M, SAUD R, 2016. Relationship between Curie isotherm surface and Moho discontinuity in the Arabian shield, Saudi Arabia[J]. Journal of Asian Earth Sciences, 128: 42-53. doi: 10.1016/j.jseaes.2016.07.025
[6]	ADDISON P S, 2002. The illustrated wavelet transform handbook[M]. Bristol, UK: Institute of Physics Publishing.
[7]	ÁNGELES C, PROL-LEDESMA R M, CASTRO K F, 2017. Organic matter characterization in sediments from the Wagner-Consag Basins, Gulf of California: Evidence of hydrothermal activity[J]. Procedia Earth and Planetary Science, 17: 550-553. doi: 10.1016/j.proeps.2016.12.139
[8]	ANSCHUTZ P, 2015. Hydrothermal activity and paleoenvironments of the Atlantis Ⅱ Deep[J]. The Red Sea, 235-249.
[9]	AUGUSTIN N, DEVEY C W, VAN DER ZWAN F M, et al, 2014. The rifting to spreading transition in the Red Sea[J]. Earth and Planetary Science Letters, 395: 217-230. doi: 10.1016/j.epsl.2014.03.047
[10]	AUGUSTIN N, VAN DER ZWAN F M, DEVEY C W, et al, 2016. Geomorphology of the central Red Sea Rift: Determining spreading processes[J]. Geomorphology, 274: 162-179. doi: 10.1016/j.geomorph.2016.08.028
[11]	BEAULIEU S E, SZAFRANSKI K, 2020. Inter Ridge global database of active submarine hydrothermal vent fields, Version 3. 4[DB/OL]. [2023-03-09]. http://vents-data. interridge.org.
[12]	CAMPOS-ENRÍQUEZ J O, ESPINOSA-CARDEÑA J M, OKSUM E, 2019. Subduction control on the curie isotherm around the Pacific-North America plate boundary in northwestern Mexico (Gulf of California). Preliminary results[J]. Journal of Volcanology and Geothermal Research, 375: 1-17. doi: 10.1016/j.jvolgeores.2019.03.005
[13]	CANET C, PROL-LEDESMA R M, DANDO P R, et al, 2010. Discovery of massive seafloor gas seepage along the Wagner Fault, northern Gulf of California[J]. Sedimentary Geology, 228(3-4): 292-303. doi: 10.1016/j.sedgeo.2010.05.004
[14]	CHARLOU J L, FOUQUET Y, DONVAL J P, et al, 1996. Mineral and gas chemistry of hydrothermal fluids on an ultrafast spreading ridge: East Pacific Rise, 17 to 19 S(Naudur cruise, 1993) phase separation processes controlled by volcanic and tectonic activity[J]. Journal of Geophysical Research: Solid Earth, 101(B7)
[15]	CRUZ R Y B, PEIFFER L, WEBER B, et al, 2020. Geochemical characteristics of pore waters from sediment cores of the Wagner Basin, Gulf of California[J]. Applied Geochemistry, 113: 104467. doi: 10.1016/j.apgeochem.2019.104467
[16]	DORSEY R J, UMHOEFER P J, 2011. Influence of sediment input and plate‐motion obliquity on basin development along an active oblique‐divergent plate boundary: Gulf of California and Salton Trough[J]. Tectonics of Sedimentary Basins: Recent Advances, 209-225.
[17]	ESQUIVEL T A, FLORES C, ORTEGA V R, et al, 2020. Magnetotelluric exploration of the Wagner Basin, Gulf of California, Mexico: Evidence for an axial magma chamber and hydrothermal circulation[J]. Journal of South American Earth Sciences, 99: 102501. doi: 10.1016/j.jsames.2020.102501
[18]	FEELY R A, BAKER E T, MARUMO K, et al, 1996. Hydrothermal plume particles and dissolved phosphate over the superfast-spreading southern East Pacific Rise[J]. Geochimica et Cosmochimica Acta, 60(13): 2297-2323. doi: 10.1016/0016-7037(96)00099-3
[19]	FUCHS S, NORDEN B, 2021. International Heat Flow Commission (2021): The global heat flow database: release 2021[DB/OL]. GFZ Data Services, [2023-03-09]. https://doi.org/10.5880/fidgeo.2021.014
[20]	GAUDREAU É, AUDET P, SCHNEIDER D A, 2019. Mapping Curie depth across western Canada from a wavelet analysis of magnetic anomaly data[J]. Journal of Geophysical Research: Solid Earth, 124(5): 4365-4385. doi: 10.1029/2018JB016726
[21]	GEBCO COMPILATION GROUP, 2021. The GEBCO_2021 Grid-A continuous terrain model of the global oceans and land[DB/OL]. Published Data Library (PDL), [2023-03-09]. https://www.bodc.ac.uk/data/published_data_library/catalogue/10.5285/c6612cbe-50b3-0cff-e053-6c86abc09f8f/
[22]	GEILERT S, HENSEN C, SCHMIDT M, et al, 2018. On the formation of hydrothermal vents and cold seeps in the Guaymas Basin, Gulf of California[J]. Biogeosciences, 15(18): 5715-5731. doi: 10.5194/bg-15-5715-2018
[23]	GONZÁLEZ-ESCOBAR M, SUÁREZ-VIDAL F, SOJO-AMEZQUITA A, et al, 2014. Consag basin: Northern gulf of California, evidence of generation of new crust, based on seismic reflection data[J]. International Geology Review, 56(11): 1315-1331. doi: 10.1080/00206814.2014.941023
[24]	HARASH F, CHEN CHAO, 2022. Determination of Curie Point depth distribution and heat flow regime characteristics in Eratosthenes seamount, eastern Mediterranean Sea[J]. Energies, 15(22): 8634. doi: 10.3390/en15228634
[25]	HOVLAND M, RUESLÅTTEN H, JOHNSEN H K, 2015. Red Sea salt formations—a result of hydrothermal processes[M]// RASUL N, STEWART I, The Red Sea. Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer: 187-203.
[26]	IWAMOTO K, SUENAGA N, YOSHIOKA S, 2022. Temperature distribution for interplate seismic events in the southcentral Alaska subduction zone based on 3-D thermomechanical modeling[J]. Tectonophysics, 843: 229604. doi: 10.1016/j.tecto.2022.229604
[27]	LARSON R L, 1972. Bathymetry, magnetic anomalies, and plate tectonic history of the mouth of the Gulf of California[J]. Geological Society of America Bulletin, 83(11): 3345-3360. doi: 10.1130/0016-7606(1972)83[3345:BMAAPT]2.0.CO;2
[28]	LEVI S, RIDDIHOUGH R, 1986. Why are marine magnetic anomalies suppressed over sedimented spreading centers?[J]. Geology, 14(8): 651-654. doi: 10.1130/0091-7613(1986)14<651:WAMMAS>2.0.CO;2
[29]	LI CHUNFENG, 2011. An integrated geodynamic model of the Nankai subduction zone and neighboring regions from geophysical inversion and modeling[J]. Journal of Geodynamics, 51(1): 64-80. doi: 10.1016/j.jog.2010.08.003
[30]	LI CHUNFENG, CHEN BING, ZHOU ZUYI, 2009. Deep crustal structures of eastern China and adjacent seas revealed by magnetic data[J]. Science in China Series D: Earth Sciences, 52(7): 984-993.
[31]	LI CHUNFENG, LU YU, WANG JIAN, 2017. A global reference model of Curie-point depths based on EMAG2[J]. Scientific reports, 7(1): 1-9. doi: 10.1038/s41598-016-0028-x
[32]	LI CHUNFENG, SHI XIAOBIN, ZHOU ZUYI, et al, 2010. Depths to the magnetic layer bottom in the South China Sea area and their tectonic implications[J]. Geophysical Journal International, 182(3): 1229-1247. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-246X.2010.04702.x
[33]	LI CHUNFENG, WANG JIAN, 2018. Thermal structures of the Pacific lithosphere from magnetic anomaly inversion[J]. Earth and Planetary Physics, 2(1): 52-66.
[34]	LI CHUNFENG, WANG JIAN, LIN JIAN, et al, 2013. Thermal evolution of the North Atlantic lithosphere: New constraints from magnetic anomaly inversion with a fractal magnetization model[J]. Geochemistry, Geophysics, Geosystems, 14(12): 5078-5105. doi: 10.1002/ggge.v14.12
[35]	LI CHUNFENG, ZHOU DUO, WANG JIAN, 2019. On application of fractal magnetization in Curie depth estimation from magnetic anomalies[J]. Acta Geophysica, 67(5): 1319-1327. doi: 10.1007/s11600-019-00339-6
[36]	LONSDALE P, BECKER K, 1985. Hydrothermal plumes, hot springs, and conductive heat flow in the Southern Trough of Guaymas Basin[J]. Earth and Planetary Science Letters, 73(2-4): 211-225. doi: 10.1016/0012-821X(85)90070-6
[37]	LOWELL R P, KOLANDAIVELU K, RONA P A, 2014. Hydrothermal activity[J]. Reference Module in Earth Systems and Environmental Sciences, Elsevier. doi: 10.1016/B978-0-12-409548-9.09132-6.
[38]	LUCAZEAU F, 2019. Analysis and mapping of an updated terrestrial heat flow data set[J]. Geochemistry, Geophysics, Geosystems, 20(8): 4001-4024. doi: 10.1029/2019GC008389
[39]	MAUS S, BARCKHAUSEN U, BERKENBOSCH H, et al, 2009. EMAG2: A 2-arc min resolution Earth Magnetic Anomaly Grid compiled from satellite, airborne, and marine magnetic measurements[J]. Geochemistry, Geophysics, Geosystems, 10(8): 8005.
[40]	MOUSAVI N, EBRAHIMZADEH ARDESTANI V, 2023. 3D surface heat flow, low-temperature basins and Curie point depth of the Iranian Plateau: Hydrocarbon reservoirs and iron deposits[J]. Journal of the Earth and Space Physics, 48(4): 137-150.
[41]	NEUMANN F, NEGRETE-ARANDA R, HARRIS R N, et al, 2017. Systematic heat flow measurements across the Wagner Basin, northern Gulf of California[J]. Earth and Planetary Science Letters, 479: 340-353. doi: 10.1016/j.epsl.2017.09.037
[42]	OKUBO Y, GRAF R J, HANSEN R O, et al, 1985. Curie point depths of the island of Kyushu and surrounding areas, Japan[J]. Geophysics, 50(3): 481-494. doi: 10.1190/1.1441926
[43]	PAMUK E, ÖZSÖZ İ, 2022. Estimation of Curie-point depths and heat flow from spectral analysis of EMAG2 magnetic data in Cyprus Island[J]. Annals of Geophysics, 65(4): GD427-GD427.
[44]	PERSAUD P, STOCK J M, STECKLER M S, et al, 2003. Active deformation and shallow structure of the Wagner, Consag, and Delfin basins, northern Gulf of California, Mexico[J]. Journal of Geophysical Research: Solid Earth, 108(B7): 2355.
[45]	PIERRET M C, CLAUER N, BOSCH D, et al, 2001. Chemical and isotopic (87Sr/86Sr, δ18O, δD) constraints to the formation processes of Red-Sea brines[J]. Geochimica et Cosmochimica Acta, 65(8): 1259-1275. doi: 10.1016/S0016-7037(00)00618-9
[46]	PROL-LEDESMA R M, TORRES-VERA M A, RODOLFO-METALPA R, et al, 2013. High heat flow and ocean acidification at a nascent rift in the northern Gulf of California[J]. Nature Communications, 4(1): 1-7.
[47]	RAMÍREZ G A, MCKAY L J, FIELDS M W, et al, 2020. The Guaymas Basin subseafloor sedimentary archaeome reflects complex environmental histories[J]. Iscience, 23(9): 101459. doi: 10.1016/j.isci.2020.101459
[48]	SAADA S A, MICKUS K, ELDOSOUKY A M, et al, 2021. Insights on the tectonic styles of the Red Sea rift using gravity and magnetic data[J]. Marine and Petroleum Geology, 133: 105253. doi: 10.1016/j.marpetgeo.2021.105253
[49]	SALEH S, SALK M, PAMUKCU O, 2013. Estimating Curie point depth and heat flow map for northern Red Sea rift of Egypt and its surroundings, from aeromagnetic data[J]. Pure and applied geophysics, 170(5): 863-885. doi: 10.1007/s00024-012-0461-0
[50]	SCHMIDT M, AL-FARAWATI R, BOTZ R, 2015. Geochemical classification of brine-filled Red Sea deeps[J]. The Red Sea: The formation, Morphology, Oceanography and Environment of A Young Ocean Basin, 219-233.
[51]	SONG JUECHEN, LI JIANGHAI, FENG BO, 2021. Hydrothermal activity and mechanism along slow-and ultraslow-spreading midocean ridges[J]. Acta Geologica Sinica, 95(8): 2273-2283.
[52]	STEIN C A, STEIN S, 1994. Constraints on hydrothermal heat flux through the oceanic lithosphere from global heat flow[J]. Journal of Geophysical Research: Solid Earth, 99(B2): 3081-3095.
[53]	STERN R J, JOHNSON P R, 2019. Constraining the opening of the Red Sea: Evidence from the Neoproterozoic margins and Cenozoic magmatism for a volcanic rifted margin[J]. Geological Setting, Palaeoenvironment and Archaeology of the Red Sea, 53-79.
[54]	STYRON R, PAGANI M, 2020. The GEM global active faults database[J]. Earthquake Spectra, 36(1): 160-180. doi:10.1177/8755293020944182
[55]	SWALLOW J C, CREASE J, 1965. Hot salty water at the bottom of the Red Sea[J]. Nature, 205(4967): 165-166. doi: 10.1038/205165a0
[56]	TANAKA A, OKUBO Y, MATSUBAYASHI O, 1999. Curie point depth based on spectrum analysis of the magnetic anomaly data in East and Southeast Asia[J]. Tectonophysics, 306(3-4): 461-470. doi: 10.1016/S0040-1951(99)00072-4
[57]	TESKE A, MCKAY L J, RAVELO A C, et al, 2019. Characteristics and evolution of sill-driven off-axis hydrothermalism in Guaymas Basin-the Ringvent site[J]. Scientific reports, 9(1): 13847. doi: 10.1038/s41598-019-50200-5
[58]	UMHOEFER P J, 2011. Why did the southern Gulf of California rupture so rapidly? — Oblique divergence across hot, weak lithosphere along a tectonically active margin[J]. GSA today, 21(11): 4-10.
[59]	VAN DER ZWAN F M, DEVEY C W, AUGUSTIN N, et al, 2015. Hydrothermal activity at the ultraslow-to slow-spreading Red Sea Rift traced by chlorine in basalt[J]. Chemical Geology, 405: 63-81. doi: 10.1016/j.chemgeo.2015.04.001
[60]	VAN DER ZWAN F M, DEVEY C W, AUGUSTIN N, 2019. Hydrothermal prospection in the Red Sea Rift: Geochemical messages from basalts[M]// RASUL N, STEWART I, Geological Setting, Palaeoenvironment and Archaeology of the Red Sea. Cham: Springer: 221-232.
[61]	VAN WIJK J W, HEYMAN S P, AXEN G J, et al, 2019. Nature of the crust in the northern Gulf of California and Salton Trough[J]. Geosphere, 15(5): 1598-1616. doi: 10.1130/GES02082.1
[62]	VON DAMM K L, LILLEY M D, SHANKS Ⅲ W C, et al, 2003. Extraordinary phase separation and segregation in vent fluids from the southern East Pacific Rise[J]. Earth and Planetary Science Letters, 206(3-4): 365-378. doi: 10.1016/S0012-821X(02)01081-6
[63]	WANG JIAN, LI CHUNFENG, 2015. Crustal magmatism and lithospheric geothermal state of western North America and their implications for a magnetic mantle[J]. Tectonophysics, 638: 112-125. doi: 10.1016/j.tecto.2014.11.002
[64]	WANG YINGCHUN, PANG ZHONGHE, 2022. Heat flux in volcanic and geothermal areas: Methods, principles, applications and future directions[J]. Gondwana Research, 122: 260-278. doi: 10.1016/j.gr.2022.09.010
[65]	YIN YIHONG, LI CHUNFENG, LU YU, 2021. Estimating Curie-point depths using both wavelet-based and Fourier spectral centroid methods in the western Pacific marginal seas[J]. Geophysical Journal International, 227(2): 798-812. doi: 10.1093/gji/ggab257
[66]	ZHOU DUO, LI CHUNFENG, ZLOTNIK S, et al, 2020. Correlations between oceanic crustal thickness, melt volume, and spreading rate from global gravity observation[J]. Marine Geophysical Research, 41(3): 1-16. doi: 10.1007/s11001-020-09401-1

移动窗口大小/(km×km)	移动窗口数量	移动步长/km
99.2×99.2	55×67	49.6
148.8×148.8	36×44	74.4
198.4×198.4	27×33	99.2

移动窗口大小/(km×km)	移动窗口数量	移动步长/km
99.2×99.2	46×56	49.6
148.8×148.8	30×37	74.4
198.4×198.4	22×27	99.2

红海与加利福尼亚湾初始扩张系统的热状态差异

Contrasting thermal states of the initial spreading systems between the Red Sea and the Gulf of California

RichHTML

PDF (PC)

赞

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

图/表 15

参考文献 66

相关文章 10

Metrics

本文评价

推荐阅读 0

[1]	程皓, 王友绍, 马晓宇. 红海榄幼苗根系呼吸代谢对水淹胁迫的响应[J]. 热带海洋学报, 2022, 41(6): 12-19.
[2]	谢勇, 王友绍, 张维仕. 红海榄肉桂酸-4-羟基化酶基因的克隆与表达分析[J]. 热带海洋学报, 2022, 41(6): 20-27.
[3]	任自强, 施小斌, 王晓芳, 赵鹏, 谌永强. 南海南沙海槽深部热状态及其构造意义[J]. 热带海洋学报, 2021, 40(4): 98-109.
[4]	秦莉真, 张蔚, 官明开, 赵晟, 程梁秋. 不同周期分潮簇对复杂河网潮位分布的影响^*[J]. 热带海洋学报, 2019, 38(1): 27-34.
[5]	刘广平, 何伟宏, 邹晓理, 王昭正, 孙天山. 红海湾西北海区海流特征分析[J]. 热带海洋学报, 2018, 37(5): 40-49.
[6]	徐子英, 杨小秋, 施小斌, 曾信, 赵俊峰, 于传海. 探针偏角对海底热流测量结果的影响^*[J]. 热带海洋学报, 2016, 35(4): 95-101.
[7]	莫竹承高忠春, 龙波. 红海榄人工幼苗生长特征研究[J]. 热带海洋学报, 2012, 31(6): 103-106.
[8]	马辉, 许鹤华, 赵俊峰, 万菊英, 陈爱华, 刘唐伟. 南沙海槽前陆盆地热结构*[J]. 热带海洋学报, 2012, 31(3): 155-161.
[9]	赵俊峰,施小斌,丘学林,刘海龄. 南海东北部居里面特征及其石油地质意义[J]. 热带海洋学报, 2010, 29(1): 126-131.
[10]	杨小秋,施小斌,许鹤华,徐行,李官保,郭兴伟,罗贤虎 . 双探针型海底热流计数据解算模型选取[J]. 热带海洋学报, 2009, 28(4): 28-34.