高频地波雷达海流验证研究述评*

doi:10.11978/j.issn.1009-5470.2013.04.001

热带海洋学报 ›› 2013, Vol. 32 ›› Issue (4): 1-7.doi: 10.11978/j.issn.1009-5470.2013.04.001cstr: 32234.14.j.issn.1009-5470.2013.04.001

• 海洋水文学 • 下一篇

高频地波雷达海流验证研究述评^*

朱大勇¹, 李炎², 郭小钢¹, 张友权³

1. 国家海洋局第三海洋研究所, 福建厦门 361005; 2. 厦门大学近海海洋环境科学国家重点实验室, 福建厦门 361005; 3. 福建省海洋预报台, 福建福州 350003

收稿日期:2011-07-21 修回日期:2011-10-09 出版日期:2013-10-20 发布日期:2013-10-30
作者简介:朱大勇(1978—), 男, 辽宁省沈阳市人, 助理研究员, 博士, 主要从事物理海洋学研究。E-mail: zhudy@tiosoa.cn
基金资助:
国家海洋局第三海洋研究所基本科研业务费专项资金资助项目(2009009、2009066)

Review of studies on the validation of surface currents measured by high-frequency radar

ZHU Da-yong¹, LI Yan², GUO Xiao-gang¹, ZHANG You-quan³

1. The Third Institute of Oceanography, State Oceanic Administration, Xiamen 361005, China; 2. State Key Laboratory of Marine Environmental Science, Xiamen University, Xiamen 361005, China; 3. Fujian Marine Forecasts, Fuzhou 350003, China

Received:2011-07-21 Revised:2011-10-09 Online:2013-10-20 Published:2013-10-30

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 本文对高频地波雷达发展与应用过程中海流的对比验证研究进行了回顾与总结。不同的验证研究采用的对比设备与验证方法有所不同, 但都通过海上同步观测对雷达反演的海流进行对比, 经统计分析评估二者之间海流观测的差异。这些研究表明, 地波雷达反演的海流流速和对比观测的均方差水平在10—20cm·s^-1之间, 主要来源是对比所用仪器与雷达观测目标之间的差异, 仪器和雷达海流的测量误差。

关键词: 地波雷达, 表层海流, 验证, 述评

Abstract: In this paper, we reviewed the studies on the validation of surface currents measured by high-frequency (HF) radar in terms of instrument development and application. We compared the HF radar current measurement with the conventional in-situ observations, and made statistic analysis to assess the difference between them. The validation errors of HF radar current data are about 10-20 cm·s^-1. The sources of these errors are the inherent differences between the physical character of the measuring target and the observation errors of the conventional instrument and the HF radar.

Key words: HF radar, surface current, validation, review

中图分类号:

P716.21

朱大勇, 李炎, 郭小钢, 张友权. 高频地波雷达海流验证研究述评^*[J]. 热带海洋学报, 2013, 32(4): 1-7.

ZHU Da-yong, LI Yan, GUO Xiao-gang, ZHANG You-quan. Review of studies on the validation of surface currents measured by high-frequency radar[J]. Journal of Tropical Oceanography, 2013, 32(4): 1-7.

参考文献

[1]CROMBIE D D. Doppler spectrum of sea echo at 13.56 Mc./s [J].Nature, 1955, 175: 681-682.
[2]STEWART R H, JOY J W. HF radio measurements of surface currents[J]. Deep Sea Res, 1974, 21: 1039-1049.
[3]BARRICK D E, EVANS M W, WEBBER B L. Ocean surface currents mapped by radar[J]. Science, 1977, 198: 138-144.
[4]HAMMOND T M, PATTIARATCHI C, ECCLES D, et al. Ocean surface current radar vector measurements on the inner continental shelf[J]. Cont Shelf Res, 1987, 7: 411-431.
[5]GURGEL K W, ANTONISCHSKI G, ESSEN H H, et al. Wellen radar (WERA): A new ground wave radar for remote sensing[J]. Coastal Engineering, 1999, 37: 219-234.
[6]KOHUT J, GLENN S, BARRICK D E. SeaSonde is integral to coastal flow model development[J]. Hydro Int, 1999, 3: 32-35.
[7]LIPA B J, BARRICK D E. Least-squares methods for the extraction of surface currents from CODAR crossed-loop data: Application at ARSLOE[J]. IEEE J Oceanic Engr, 1983, 8: 226-253.
[8]FRISCH A S, WEBER B L. A new technique for measuring tidal currents by using a two-site HF Doppler Radar System[J]. J Geophys Res,1980,85 (C1): 485-493.
[9]HOLBROOK J R, FRISCH A S. A Comparison of near-surface CODAR and CACAM measurements in the Strait of Juan De Fuca, August 1978[J]. J Geophys Res, 1981, 86(C11): 10908-10912.
[10]JANOPAUL M M, BROCHE P, DE MAISTRE J C, et al. Comparison of measurements of sea currents by HF radar and by conventional means[J]. Int J Remote Sens, 1982, 3: 409-422.
[11]ESSEN H H, MITTELSTAEDT E, SCHIRMER F. On near-shore surface current measurements by means of radar[J]. Dtsch Hydrogr Z, 1981, 34: 1-14.
[12]COLLAR P G, HOWARTH J M, MILLARD N W, et al. An intercomparison of HF radar observations of surface currents with moored current meter data and displacement rates of acoustically tracked drogued floats. Evaluation, comparison and calibration of oceanographic instruments [C]// SOCIETY FOR UNDERWATER TECHNOLOGY. Proceedings of an international conference, Advances in Underwater Technology and Offshore Engineering. London: Graham & Trotman, 1985: 163-182.
[13]SCHOTT F A, FRISCH S A, LEAMAN K, et al. High frequency Doppler radar measurements of the Florida current in summer 1983[J]. J Geophys Res, 1985, 90(C5): 9006-9016.
[14]BARRICK D E. CODAR directional biases with a four element antenna array[J]. IEEE Trans Geosci Remote Sens, 1986, GE-24, (3): 415-420.
[15]SCHOTT F A, FRISCH S A, LARSEN J C. Comparison of surface currents measured by HF Doppler Radar in the Western Florida straits during November 1983 to January 1984 and Florida current transports[J]. J Geophys Res, 1986, 91(C7): 8451-8460.
[16]PRANDLE D, RYDER D K. Measurement of surface currents in Liverpool Bay by high frequency radar[J]. Nature 1985, 315: 128-131.
[17]BROCHE P, SALOMON J C, DE MAISTRE J S, et al. Tidal currents in Baie de Seine: Comparison of numerical modeling and high frequency radar measurements[J]. Estuarine Coastal Shelf Science, 1986, 23: 465-476.
[18]PRANDLE D, RYDER D K. Comparison of observed (HF radar) and modeled nearshore velocities[J]. Cont Shelf Res, 1989, 9(11): 941-963.
[19]MATTHEWS J P, SIMPSON J H, BROWN J. Remote sensing of the shelf sea currents using an HF radar system[J]. J Geophys Res, 1988, 93(C3): 2302-2310.
[20]HERR F, LUTHER C, MARMORINO G O, et al. Science plan for the High Resolution Remote Sensing Program[J]. EOS, 1991, 72: 214.
[21]SHAY L K, ROSS D B, GRABER H C. Ocean surface current profiling using HF radar. RSMAS Tech. TR92- 004[M]. Miami: Rosenstiel School of Marine and Atmospheric Science, University of Miami, 1992: 55.
[22]SHAY L K, GRABER H C, ROSS D B, et al. Mesoscale ocean surface current structure detected by high-frequency radar[J]. J Atmos Oceanic Technol, 1995, 12: 881-900.
[23]PADUAN J D and ROSENFLED L K. Remotely sensed surface currents in Monterey Bay from shore-based HF radar (CODAR) [J]. J Geophys Res, 1996, 101(C9): 20669-20686.
[24]CHAPMAN R D, SHAY L K, GRABER H C, et al. On the accuracy of HF radar surface current measurements: Intercomparisons with ship-based sensors[J]. J Geophys Res, 1997, 102(C8): 18737-18748.
[25]KOSRO P M, BARTH J A, STRUB T P. The coastal jet: Observations of surface currents over the Oregon continental shelf from HF radar[J]. Oceanography, 1997, 10(2): 53-57.
[26]SHAY L K, LENTZ S J, GRABER H C, et al. Current structure variations detected by high-frequency radar and vector measuring current meters[J]. J Atmos Oceanic Technol, 1998, 15: 237-256.
[27]GRABER H C, HAUS B K, CHAPMAN R D, et al. HF radar comparisons with moored estimates of current speed and direction: Expected differences and implications[J]. J Geophys Res, 1997, 102(C8): 18749-18765.
[28]EMERY M B, WASHBURN L, HARLAN J A. Evaluating radial current measurements from CODAR high-frequency radars with moored current meters[J]. J Atmos Oceanic Technol, 2004, 21(8): 1259-1271.
[29]YOSHIKAWA Y, MASUDA A, MARUBAYASHI K, et al. On the accuracy of HF radar measurement in the Tsushima Strait[J]. J Geophys Res, 2006. doi: 10.1029/ 2005JC003232.
[30]吴雄斌, 杨绍麟, 程丰, 等. 高频地波雷达东海海洋表面矢量流探测试验[J]. 地球物理学报, 2003, 46(3): 340-346.
[31]申辉, 孙元福, 逄爱梅. 高频雷达OSMAR 海流探测精度的对比验证[J]. 青岛海洋大学学报, 2002, 32(5): 680-686.
[32]龚子平, 柯亨玉, 侯杰昌, 等. 高频地波雷达海洋表面流测量误差分析[J]. 武汉大学学报, 2005, 53(3): 356-360.

高频地波雷达海流验证研究述评^*

Review of studies on the validation of surface currents measured by high-frequency radar

PDF (PC)

赞

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献

相关文章 8

Metrics

本文评价

推荐阅读 0

[1]	周旋, 李自强, 安玉柱, 张耀文, 杨晓峰. 基于高频地波雷达资料的海南中东部近海表层海流特征[J]. 热带海洋学报, 2021, 40(2): 103-111.
[2]	朱怀鑫, 俎婷婷, 李健, 舒业强, 陈举, 王东晓. 基于高频地波雷达观测的粤西近海潮流潮能分析[J]. 热带海洋学报, 2018, 37(5): 25-32.
[3]	韦国建, 李耀国, 林坚士, 何毛贤. 马氏珠母贝生长性状QTL鉴定及基因型选择效应分析^*[J]. 热带海洋学报, 2017, 36(2): 19-25.
[4]	朱宇航, 曾学智, 彭世球. 高频地波雷达观测资料对南海北部海流的数值同化实验^*[J]. 热带海洋学报, 2016, 35(6): 10-18.
[5]	李自立, 曹红燕, 贾春洋. 北部湾海面基于地波雷达观测“天兔”台风风场[J]. 热带海洋学报, 2016, 35(4): 31-34.
[6]	隋玉正, 崔林丽, 史军, 李淑娟. 一种多源全球海洋降水资料融合方法[J]. 热带海洋学报, 2016, 35(2): 50-56.
[7]	毛华斌,陈举,邱春华,练树民 . 单点高频地波雷达资料估算潮能耗散的方法[J]. 热带海洋学报, 2011, 30(6): 18-23.
[8]	罗文造, 韦成龙, 王立明, 杨蜀冀. 海上地震勘探主要采集参数的选取与验证——以南海北部某调查区为例[J]. 热带海洋学报, 2009, 28(4): 93-101.