基于贝叶斯网络和GIS的热带气旋灾害风险评估

doi:10.11978/2022092

热带海洋学报 ›› 2023, Vol. 42 ›› Issue (5): 17-29.doi: 10.11978/2022092CSTR: 32234.14.2022092

所属专题：全球变化专题

基于贝叶斯网络和GIS的热带气旋灾害风险评估

田城¹(), 黎鑫¹(), 杜洋¹, 李明¹, 谢勇², 夏际炉³

1. 国防科技大学气象海洋学院, 湖南长沙 410005
2. 江西省气象局, 江西南昌 330038
3. 95903部队气象台, 湖北武汉 430000

收稿日期:2022-04-29 修回日期:2022-07-12 出版日期:2023-09-10 发布日期:2022-07-19
作者简介:
田城(1998—), 男, 湖南省常德市人, 硕士研究生, 从事海洋灾害风险评估研究。email: TCzcyx2021@163.com
基金资助:
国家自然科学基金项目(41605051); 国家自然科学基金项目(41976188); 国防科技大学重点科研计划项目(ZK17-02-010)

Assessment of tropical cyclone disaster risk based on the Bayesian network and GIS

TIAN Cheng¹(), LI Xin¹(), DU Yang¹, LI Ming¹, XIE Yong², XIA Jilu³

1. College of Meteorology and Oceanography, National University of Defense Technology, Changsha 410005, China
2. Jiangxi Meteorological Bureau, Nanchang 330008, China
3. 95903 Troop Meteorological Observatory, Wuhan 430000, China

Received:2022-04-29 Revised:2022-07-12 Online:2023-09-10 Published:2022-07-19
Supported by:
National Natural Science Foundation of China(41605051); National Natural Science Foundation of China(41976188); Key Research Program of National University of Defense Technology(ZK17-02-010)

摘要/Abstract

摘要：

针对热带气旋灾害的复杂性和不确定性, 文章基于贝叶斯网络和地理信息系统(geographic information system, GIS)提出了一种新的热带气旋灾害风险评估模型。该模型能够从客观历史数据中自动挖掘灾害影响因素间的因果关系, 并以概率形式进行表达和推理, 从而对不确定灾害风险进行评估预测。基于1980—2016年中国东南沿海三省(广东、福建、浙江)的热带气旋灾害历史数据进行风险评估实验, 选取致灾因子危险性、孕灾环境敏感性、承灾体脆弱性3个方面共计12个评估指标作为模型输入, 直接经济损失量化为灾害风险等级作为模型输出, 构建基于贝叶斯网络的风险评估模型。然后利用2017—2021年热带气旋灾害数据进行模型检验, 评估预测的准确率为80.75%。模型预测的极低、低、中、高和极高风险的相对误差分别为27.72%、8.45%、18.58%、16.52%和19.12%, 风险预测值的区划结果在空间形态上与实际灾害损失分布高度一致。此外, 还将评估模型构建方法应用于“莫兰蒂”台风灾害个例的风险评估。结果表明, 模型评估出的灾害高风险和极高风险区域与实际灾情报告基本一致。由此可见, 本研究建立的热带气旋灾害风险评估模型具有较高的准确率和可信度, 为热带气旋灾害风险评估提供了一种新的方法途径和技术支撑。

关键词: 热带气旋灾害, 风险评估, 东南沿海三省, 贝叶斯网络, 地理信息系统

Abstract:

To address the complexity and uncertainty of tropical cyclone disaster, this study proposes a new tropical cyclone disaster risk assessment model based on the Bayesian network and geographic information system (GIS). The model can automatically explore the causal relationships among disaster influencing factors from objective historical data, and express them in the form of probabilities to assess and predict uncertain disaster risks. Based on the historical data of tropical cyclone disaster in three southeastern coastal provinces (Guangdong, Fujian, and Zhejiang) of China from 1980 to 2016 for risk assessment experiments, a total of 12 assessment indicators in three aspects, i.e., hazard of disaster-causing factors, sensitivity of disaster-inducing environment, and vulnerability of disaster-bearing bodies, were selected as model inputs, and direct economic losses were quantified as disaster risk levels as model outputs to construct a Bayesian network-based risk assessment model. The model was then tested against cyclone disaster data from 2017 to 2021, and the accuracy of the assessment prediction was 80.75%. The relative errors of very low, low, medium, high and very high risks predicted by the model were 27.72%, 8.45%, 18.58%, 16.52%and 19.12%, respectively, and the zonal results of risk prediction values were highly consistent with the actual disaster loss distribution in terms of spatial patterns. In addition, the assessment construction method was applied to the risk assessment of individual cases of Typhoon “Meranti”. The results showed that the high and very high risk areas assessed by the model were basically consistent with the actual disaster reports. Thus, the tropical cyclone disaster risk assessment model established in this study has high accuracy and credibility, and provides a new methodological approach and technical support for tropical cyclone disaster risk assessment.

Key words: tropical cyclone disaster, risk assessment, three southeastern coastal provinces, Bayesian network, GIS

田城, 黎鑫, 杜洋, 李明, 谢勇, 夏际炉. 基于贝叶斯网络和GIS的热带气旋灾害风险评估[J]. 热带海洋学报, 2023, 42(5): 17-29.

TIAN Cheng, LI Xin, DU Yang, LI Ming, XIE Yong, XIA Jilu. Assessment of tropical cyclone disaster risk based on the Bayesian network and GIS[J]. Journal of Tropical Oceanography, 2023, 42(5): 17-29.

图/表 13

图1

表1

表2

图2

图3

表3

表4

表5

图4

图5

图6

图7

图8

参考文献 48

[1]	包文轩, 宫阿都, 徐澯, 等, 2023. 基于区域灾害系统论的广东省台风灾害风险评估——以“山竹”台风为例[J]. 北京师范大学学报(自然科学版), 59(1): 94-103.
	BAO WENXUAN, GONG A’DU, XU CAN, et al, 2023. Guangdong Province typhoon disaster risk assessment based on regional disaster system theory - Illustrated by the case of “Mangkhut” Typhoon[J]. Journal of Beijing Normal University (Natural Science), 59(1): 94-103 (in Chinese with English abstract).
[2]	陈楷俊, 陈艺仪, 陈菁, 2019. 近30年粤东地区台风灾害风险评估与分析[J]. 水土保持研究, 26(3): 362-366, 372.
	CHEN KAIJUN, CHEN YIYI, CHEN JING, 2019. Risk assessment and analysis of typhoon disaster in east Guangdong in the period 1989—2017[J]. Research of Soil and Water Conservation, 26(3): 362-366, 372 (in Chinese with English abstract).
[3]	陈香, 2007. 福建省台风灾害时空变化分析[J]. 灾害学, 22(4): 66-70.
	CHEN XIANG, 2007. Analysis of temporal and spatial changes of typhoon in Fujian Province[J]. Journal of Catastrophology, 22(4): 66-70 (in Chinese with English abstract).
[4]	高歌, 黄大鹏, 赵珊珊, 2019. 基于信息扩散方法的中国台风灾害年月尺度风险评估[J]. 气象, 45(11): 1600-1610.
	GAO GE, HUANG DAPENG, ZHAO SHANSHAN, 2019. Annual and monthly risk assessment of typhoon disasters in China based on the information diffusion method[J]. Meteorological Monthly, 45(11): 1600-1610 (in Chinese with English abstract).
[5]	黎鑫, 洪梅, 王博, 等, 2012. 南海-印度洋海域海洋安全灾害评估与风险区划[J]. 热带海洋学报, 31(6): 121-127.
	LI XIN, HONG MEI, WANG BO, et al, 2012. Disaster assessment and risk zoning concerning the South China Sea and Indian Ocean safety[J]. Journal of Tropical Oceanography, 31(6): 121-127 (in Chinese with English abstract). doi: 10.11978/j.issn.1009-5470.2012.06.019
[6]	李超超, 田军仓, 申若竹, 2020. 洪涝灾害风险评估研究进展[J]. 灾害学, 35(3): 131-136.
	LI CHAOCHAO, TIAN JUNCANG, SHEN RUOZHU, 2020. Review on assessment of Flood and Waterlogging Risk[J]. Journal of Catastrophology, 35(3): 131-136 (in Chinese with English abstract).
[7]	李明, 张韧, 洪梅, 2018a. 基于加权贝叶斯网络的海洋灾害风险评估[J]. 海洋通报, 37(2): 121-128.
	LI MING, ZHANG REN, HONG MEI, 2018. Marine disaster risk assessment based on weighted Bayesian Network[J]. Marine Science Bulletin, 37(2): 121-128 (in Chinese with English abstract).
[8]	李明, 张韧, 洪梅, 等, 2018b. 基于信息流改进的贝叶斯网络结构学习算法[J]. 系统工程与电子技术, 40(6): 1385-1390.
	LI MING, ZHANG REN, HONG MEI, et al, 2018. Improved structure learning algorithm of Bayesian network based on information flow[J]. Systems Engineering and Electronics, 40(6): 1385-1390 (in Chinese with English abstract). doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1001-506X.2018.06.28
[9]	刘合香, 卢耀健, 王萌, 等, 2020. 基于信息扩散技术的华南极端台风灾害风险评估[J]. 热带海洋学报, 39(3): 31-41. doi: 10.11978/2019071
	LIU HEXANG, LU YAOJIAN, WANG MENG, et al, 2020. Risk assessment of extreme typhoon disasters based on information diffusion technology[J]. Journal of Tropical Oceanography, 39(3): 31-41 (in Chinese with English abstract). doi: 10.11978/2019071
[10]	民政部门户网站, 2022.06.17. 国家减灾委、民政部紧急启动国家Ⅳ级救灾应急响应协助福建省做好“莫兰蒂”台风灾害救灾工作[EB/OL]. [2016-09-16]. http://www.ndrcc.org.cn/yjgz/10466.jhtml (in Chinese).
[11]	潘金兰, 徐庆娟, 刘合香, 2021. 基于AHP-TOPSIS最优组合赋权的台风灾害风险评估[J]. 南宁师范大学学报(自然科学版), 38(1): 60-67.
	PAN JINLAN, XU QINGJUAN, LIU HEXIANG, 2021. Risk assessment of typhoon disaster in South China based on optimal combination weights of AHP-anti-entropy-TOPSIS[J]. Journal of Nanning Normal University (Natural Science Edition), 38(1): 60-67 (in Chinese with English abstract).
[12]	申怀飞, 杨清洁, 魏亿鑫, 等, 2020. 基于GIS的湖南省滑坡灾害风险和损失评估[J]. 水土保持通报, 40(6): 146-152, 329.
	SHEN HUAIFEI, YANG QINGJIE, WEI YIXIN, et al, 2020. A study on risk and vulnerability assessment of landslide in Hunan Province based on GIS[J]. Bulletin of Soil and Water Conservation, 40(6): 146-152, 329 (in Chinese with English abstract).
[13]	汤国安, 2019. 地理信息系统教程(第二版)[M]. 北京: 高等教育出版社.
	TANG GUO’AN, 2019. Geographic information system tutorial (Second Edition)[M]. Beijing: Higher Education Press (in Chinese).
[14]	王洁, 杨奕杰, 王杰, 等, 2021. 基于近20a历史数据的中国沿海城市台风灾害风险评估[J]. 海洋预报, 38(5): 24-30.
	WANG JIE, YANG YIJIE, WANG JIE, et al, 2021. Typhoon disaster risk assessment of coastal cities in China based on historical data over the past 20 years[J]. Marine Forecasts, 38(5): 24-30 (in Chinese with English abstract).
[15]	王伟, 金贤锋, 2020. 面向国土空间规划的测绘地理信息技术及数据成果服务应用展望[J]. 测绘通报, 12: 58-64.
	WANG WEI, JIN XIANFENG, 2020. Application of surveying and mapping geographical information technology and data achievement service for territorial and spatial planning[J]. Bulletin of Surveying and Mapping, 12: 58-64 (in Chinese with English abstract).
[16]	温家洪, 黄蕙, 陈珂, 等, 2012. 基于社区的台风灾害概率风险评估——以上海市杨浦区富禄里居委地区为例[J]. 地理科学, 32(3): 348-355. doi: 10.13249/j.cnki.sgs.2012.03.348
	WEN JIAHONG, HUANG HUI, CHEN KE, et al, 2012. Probabilistic Community-based typhoon disaster risk assessment: A case of fululi community, Shanghai[J]. Scientia Geographica Sinica, 32(3): 348-355 (in Chinese with English abstract).
[17]	吴斌, 钱业, 王瑞芳, 等, 2021. 全球气候模式对影响西北太平洋台风强度的大尺度环境因子的模拟评估[J]. 干旱气象, 39(3): 466-479.
	WU BIN, QIAN YE, WANG RUIFANG, et al, 2021. Assessment of large scale environmental factors affecting typhoon intensity in Northwest Pacific Simulated by global climate models[J]. Journal of Arid Meteorology, 39(3): 466-479 (in Chinese with English abstract).
[18]	徐庆娟, 潘金兰, 刘合香, 2020. 基于云模型—风险矩阵的华南台风灾害综合等级评估[J]. 气象与减灾研究, 43(3): 161-169.
	XU QINGJUAN, PAN JINLAN, LIU HEXIANG, 2020. Comprehensive grade assessment of typhoon disaster in South China based on cloud Model-Risk Matrix[J]. Meteorology and Disaster Reduction Research, 43(3): 161-169 (in Chinese with English abstract).
[19]	于小兵, 俞显瑞, 吉中会, 等, 2019. 基于信息扩散的东南沿海台风灾害风险评估[J]. 灾害学, 34(1): 73-77.
	YU XIAOBING, YU XIANRUI, JI ZHONGHUI, et al, 2019. Risk assessment of typhoon disaster in China’s South-East Coastal Areas -Based on information diffusion theory[J]. Journal of Catastrophology, 34(1): 73-77 (in Chinese with English abstract).
[20]	张悦, 李珊珊, 陈灏, 等, 2017. 广东省台风灾害风险综合评估[J]. 热带气象学报, 2017, 33(2): 281-288.
	ZHANG YUE, LI SHANSHAN, CHEN HAO, et al, 2017. Evaluation of typhoon disaster risk in Guangdong province[J]. Journal of Tropical Meteorology, 33(2): 281-288 (in Chinese with English abstract).
[21]	周华任, 张晟, 穆松, 等, 2015. 综合评价方法及其军事应用[M]. 北京: 清华大学出版社.
	ZHOU HUAREN, ZHANG SHENG, MU SONG, et al, 2015. Comprehensive evaluation method and its military[M]. Beijing: Tsinghua University Press (in Chinese).
[22]	朱婧, 陆逸, 李国平, 等, 2017. 基于县级分辨率的福建省台风灾害风险评估[J]. 灾害学, 32(3): 204-209.
	ZHU JING, LU YI, LI GUOPING, et al, 2017. Risk assessment of typhoon disasters in Fujian Province of Each County[J]. Journal of Catastrophology, 32(3): 204-209 (in Chinese with English abstract)
[23]	朱婧, 叶龙彬, 陈德花, 等, 2020. 1614号台风“莫兰蒂”在厦门湾及其周边海域引发风暴潮的数值模拟[J]. 海洋预报, 37(6): 20-30.
	ZHU JING, YE LONGBIN, CHEN DEHUA, et al, 2020. Numerical simulation of storm surge in Xiamen Bay and its adjacent seas caused by typhoon “Moranti” (1614)[J]. Marine Forecasts, 37(6): 20-30 (in Chinese with English abstract).
[24]	中国新闻网, 2022.06.17. “莫兰蒂”台风造成浙闽直接经济损失210.73亿元[EB/OL]. http://news.cri.cn/uc-eco/20160918/660ac9c9-c670-1ba3-a8a2-c93667984aab.html (in Chinese).
[25]	CAI LIN, LI YINGBING, CHEN MIN, et al, 2020. Tropical cyclone risk assessment for China at the provincial level based on clustering analysis[J]. Geomatics, Natural Hazards and Risk, 11(1): 869-886. doi: 10.1080/19475705.2020.1753823
[26]	CAO YONG HUI, 2014. Study of four types of learning bayesian networks cases[J]. Applied Mathematics & Information Sciences, 8(1): 379-386.
[27]	CHEN XIAOYU, WU LIGUANG, ZHANG JIAOYAN, 2011. Increasing duration of tropical cyclones over China[J]. Geophysical Research Letters, 38(2): L0278.
[28]	CHOU JIEMING, DONG WENJIE, TU GANG, et al, 2020. Spatiotemporal distribution of landing tropical cyclones and disaster impact analysis in coastal China during 1990—2016[J]. Physics and Chemistry of the Earth, 115: 102830.
[29]	COLACE F, DE SANTO M, GRECO L, 2014. Learning bayesian network structure using a MultiExpert Approach[J]. International Journal of Software Engineering and Knowledge Engineering, 24(2): 269-284. doi: 10.1142/S0218194014500119
[30]	GAO ZHICHENG, WAN RONGJIN, YE QIAN, et al, 2020. Typhoon disaster risk assessment based on emergy theory: A case study of Zhuhai City, Guangdong Province, China[J]. Sustainability, 12(10): 4212. doi: 10.3390/su12104212
[31]	HOQUE M A-A, PHINN S, ROELFSEMA C, 2017. A systematic review of tropical cyclone disaster management research using remote sensing and spatial analysis[J]. Ocean & Coastal Management, 146: 109-120.
[32]	HOQUE M A-A, PRADHAN B, AHMED N, et al, 2019. Tropical cyclone risk assessment using geospatial techniques for the eastern coastal region of Bangladesh[J]. Science of the Total Environment, 692: 10-22. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2019.07.132
[33]	KIM J-M, SON K, KIM Y-J, 2019. Assessing regional typhoon risk of disaster management by clustering typhoon paths[J]. Environment Development and Sustainability, 21(5): 2083-2096. doi: 10.1007/s10668-018-0086-2
[34]	KNAPP K R, KRUK M C, LEVINSON D H, et al, 2010. The international best track archive for climate stewardship (IBTrACS) Unifying Tropical Cyclone Data[J]. Bulletin of the American Meteorological Society, 2010, 91(3): 363-376. doi: 10.1175/2009BAMS2755.1
[35]	LI MING, ZHANG REN, LIU KEFENG, 2021a. A new marine disaster assessment model combining bayesian network with information diffusion[J]. Journal of Marine Science and Engineering, 9(6): 640. doi: 10.3390/jmse9060640
[36]	LI MING, ZHANG REN, LIU KEFENG, 2021b. Risk assessment of marine environments along the South China Sea and North Indian Ocean on the basis of a Weighted Bayesian Network[J]. Journal of Ocean University of China, 20(3): 521-531. doi: 10.1007/s11802-021-4631-5
[37]	LI ZHUANG, HU SHENPING, GAO GUOPING, et al, 2021. Risk reasoning from factor correlation of maritime traffic under arctic sea ice status association with a bayesian belief network[J]. Sustainability, 13(1): 147. doi: 10.3390/su13010147
[38]	LIU ZHANSHENG, JIAO YUEYUE, LI ANXIU, et al, 2021. Risk assessment of Urban Rail Transit PPP project construction based on bayesian network[J]. Sustainability, 13(20): 11507. doi: 10.3390/su132011507
[39]	PANG SULIN, LI SHUHAN, HU XIAOFENG, 2020. Typhoon carrier disaster loss index models and application based on principal component analysis[J]. Journal of Coastal Research, 108(S1): 68-72.
[40]	PAUL S, GHEBREYESUS D, SHARIF H O, 2019. Brief communication: Analysis of the fatalities and Socio-Economic impacts caused by hurricane florence[J]. Geosciences, 9(2): 58. doi: 10.3390/geosciences9020058
[41]	PUOTINEN M L, 2007. Modelling the risk of cyclone wave damage to coral reefs using GIS: a case study of the Great Barrier Reef, 1969—2003[J]. International Journal of Geographical Information Science, 21(1): 97-120. doi: 10.1080/13658810600852230
[42]	SAJJAD M, CHAN J C L, KANWAL S, 2020. Integrating spatial statistics tools for coastal risk management: A case-study of typhoon risk in the mainland of China[J]. Ocean & Coastal Management, 184: 105018.
[43]	WANG WEI, DING FENG, DAI JIYANG, 2012. Maximum likelihood least squares identification for systems with autoregressive moving average noise[J]. Applied Mathematical Modelling, 36(5): 1842-1853. doi: 10.1016/j.apm.2011.07.083
[44]	WU JIANSONG, HU ZHUQIANG, CHEN JINYUE, et al, 2018. Risk assessment of underground subway stations to fire disasters using Bayesian Network[J]. Sustainability, 10(10): 3810. doi: 10.3390/su10103810
[45]	WU ZENING, SHEN YANXIA, WANG HUILIANG, et al, 2019. Assessing urban flood disaster risk using Bayesian network model and GIS applications[J]. Geomatics, Natural Hazards and Risk, 10(1): 2163-2184. doi: 10.1080/19475705.2019.1685010
[46]	YU XIPING, NIU XIAOJING, ZHOU HAOJIE, 2016. Statistical law for tropical cyclone motion in the Northwest Pacific Ocean[J]. International Journal of Climatology, 36(4): 1700-1707. doi: 10.1002/joc.2016.36.issue-4
[47]	ZHANG YONG, FAN GAOFENG, HE YUE, et al, 2017. Risk assessment of typhoon disaster for the Yangtze River Delta of China[J]. Geomatics, Natural Hazards and Risk, 8(2): 1580-1591. doi: 10.1080/19475705.2017.1362040
[48]	ZHOU MINDAN, KUANG YAOQIU, RUAN ZHU, et al, 2021. Geospatial modeling of the tropical cyclone risk in the Guangdong Province, China[J]. Geomatics Natural Hazards & Risk, 12(1): 2931-2955.

Metrics

Viewed

Full text

1128

HTML			PDF

最新录用	在线预览	正式出版	最新录用	在线预览	正式出版
0	0	274	63	0	791

来源	本网站	其他网站

次数	779	349
比例	69%	31%

Abstract

669

最新录用	在线预览	正式出版

143	0	526

来源	本网站	其他网站

次数	521	148
比例	78%	22%

Cited

Web of Science	Crossref	ScienceDirect	Search for Citations in Google Scholar >>


This page requires you have already subscribed to WoS.

Shared

风险组成成分	风险指标
致灾因子危险性	最小中心压强
	频率
	影响持续时间
	降水
	风速
孕灾环境敏感性	高程
	坡度
	土里利用覆盖率
	归一化植被指数
	海岸线接近距离
承灾体脆弱性	地方生产总值(GDP)
承灾体脆弱性	人口密度

划分的区域单元格	1	2	3	4	……	4039	4040	4041
最小中心压强	1	1	1	2	……	4	4	4
频率	1	1	1	0	……	4	4	4
影响持续时间	0	0	0	0	……	2	4	4
降水	4	4	4	4	……	0	0	0
风速	2	2	2	2	……	2	1	2
高程	3	4	3	4	……	3	3	3
坡度	4	4	3	4	……	3	3	3
土地利用覆盖率	1	3	4	4	……	3	4	0
归一化植被指数	2	0	2	3	……	1	1	1
海岸线接近距离	2	2	2	3	……	4	4	4
GDP	4	4	4	4	……	4	4	4
人口密度	0	0	0	0	……	0	0	0
热带气旋灾害风险	3	3	3	3	……	2	2	2

降水等级	灾害风险等级
降水等级	0	1	2	3	4
0	0.0206	0.0995	0.0443	0.0198	0.0000
1	0.1777	0.0357	0.0521	0.0555	0.0201
2	0.0985	0.0636	0.0404	0.0047	0.0573
3	0.0073	0.0675	0.0010	0.0177	0.0417
4	0.0000	0.0000	0.0000	0.0443	0.0307

测试集样本	0	1	2	3	4	评估风险等级	实际风险等级
1	0	0	0	0.811148	0.188852	3	4
2	0.844427	0.155573	0	0	0	0	0
3	0.862136	0.137864	0	0	0	0	0
4	0	0	0	0	1	4	4
⋮	⋮	⋮	⋮	⋮	⋮	⋮	⋮
201	0	0	0.029417	0.970583	0	3	3
202	1	0	0	0	0	0	0
203	1	0	0	0	0	0	0

风险等级	0	1	2	3	4
模型预测风险等级	1055	1424	951	556	55
实际风险等级	826	1313	1168	666	68
相对误差/%	27.72	8.45	18.58	16.52	19.12

基于贝叶斯网络和GIS的热带气旋灾害风险评估

Assessment of tropical cyclone disaster risk based on the Bayesian network and GIS

RichHTML

PDF (PC)

赞

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

图/表 13

参考文献 48

相关文章 5

Metrics

本文评价

推荐阅读 0

[1]	丁依婷, 董帝渤. 基于韧性视角的福建沿海风暴潮风险综合评估研究[J]. 热带海洋学报, 2024, 43(1): 126-136.
[2]	陈子燊, 施伟勇, 路剑飞. 波高周期联合分布四种重现水平对比分析^*[J]. 热带海洋学报, 2018, 37(4): 18-23.
[3]	郝勤伟, 徐向荣, 陈辉, 刘珊, 陈军, 刘双双, 应光国. 广州市南沙水产养殖区抗生素的残留特性^*[J]. 热带海洋学报, 2017, 36(1): 106-113.
[4]	张广平, 谢忠, 罗显刚, 张晨晓. 基于WebGIS的海南省台风灾害管理决策辅助系统[J]. 热带海洋学报, 2014, 33(6): 80-87.
[5]	黎鑫, 洪梅王博张韧葛珊珊钱龙霞. 南海-印度洋海域海洋安全灾害评估与风险区划[J]. 热带海洋学报, 2012, 31(6): 121-127.