永兴岛涡动相关数据处理与质量评价*

doi:10.11978/2016124

热带海洋学报 ›› 2017, Vol. 36 ›› Issue (4): 48-59.doi: 10.11978/2016124CSTR: 32234.14.2016124

所属专题：海洋大数据及应用

永兴岛涡动相关数据处理与质量评价*

周峰华^1,²(), 张荣望³, 石睿¹, 何云开¹, 陈举¹, 王东晓¹, 谢强⁴()

1. 热带海洋环境国家重点实验室(中国科学院南海海洋研究所), 广东广州 510300
2. 中国科学院大学, 北京 100049
3. 中国海洋大学, 山东青岛 266100
4. 中国科学院深海科学与工程研究所, 海南三亚 572000

收稿日期:2016-11-25 修回日期:2017-03-06 出版日期:2017-07-20 发布日期:2017-07-26
作者简介:
作者简介：周峰华(1988—), 男, 江苏省徐州市人, 工程师, 在职博士研究生, 主要从事边界层海-气通量, 海洋观测网络系统集成技术, 捷联惯导式测波技术, 多源传感器信息融合技术等研究。E-mail:zhoufh@scsio.ac.cn
基金资助:
中国科学院野外台站网络建设项目-西沙海洋观测站(KZCX2-YW-Y202);中国科学院关键技术人才项目-2016

A study of data processing and quality assessment of the eddy convariance system off Yongxing Island

Fenghua ZHOU^1,²(), Rongwang ZHANG³, Rui SHI¹, Yunkai HE¹, Ju CHEN¹, Dongxiao WANG¹, Qiang XIE⁴()

1. State Key Laboratory of Tropical Oceanography (South China Sea Institute of Oceanology, Chinese Academy of Sciences), Guangzhou 510300, China
2. University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100049, China
3. Ocean University of China, Qingdao 266100, China
4. Institute of Deep-sea Science and Engineering, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Sanya 572000, China

Received:2016-11-25 Revised:2017-03-06 Online:2017-07-20 Published:2017-07-26
Supported by:
Station Network Construction Project, Chinese Academy of Sciences-Xisha Marine Observatory (KZCX2-YW-Y202);Chinese Academy of Sciences Key Technology Talent Program-2016

摘要/Abstract

摘要：

基于永兴岛2016年2月份实测涡动原始数据, 用EddyPro软件进行数据后处理, 并对各处理步骤前、后进行定量比较分析, 进一步对通量计算结果进行质量分级评价、足迹分析, 最后对分别使用EddyPro软件和EasyFlux_DL在线计算程序得到通量结果进行比较。结果表明, 野点剔除、坐标旋转、频率补偿和空气密度修正均会影响涡动相关通量的计算结果。野点剔除在动量和感热通量的计算中无明显影响, 在潜热和二氧化碳通量计算中则不可忽略。坐标旋转使动量、潜热和二氧化碳通量分别增加了11.28%、7.36%和18.53%。空气密度效应校正(WPL校正)对二氧化碳通量计算影响显著, 经空气密度修正后降低了7.87%。总体质量评价结果为, 动量、感热、潜热和二氧化碳通量中高质量数据(1~3级)所占比例分别为90.29%、90.22%、88.46%和85.41%。源区分析表明, 72.04%的通量数据落在第一兴趣源区(北至东北方向10°~80°, 平均水深超过10m的海洋下垫面)。EddyPro和EasyFlux两者的整体趋势一致, EddyPro引入更加严格的野点剔除指标, 得到的结果偏小, 但更可靠精确。

关键词: 涡动相关仪, 海—气通量, 观测, 质量评价, 永兴岛

Abstract:

This study was based on the raw eddy-covariance (EC) data measured in February 2016 from the observation tower on Yongxing Island. EddyPro software was used for data post-processing, and the influence on flux calculation was quantitatively analyzed before and after each processing step. Furthermore, flux data quality classification, footprint analysis and comparison with calculated results using easyflux_dl real time programme were conducted. The results showed that despiking, coordinate rotation, frequency response correction and density correction all influenced the flux calculation result to different degrees. The influences of coordinate rotation on momentum flux, latent heat flux and carbon dioxide flux were evident, which revealed increases of 11.28%, 7.36% and 18.53%, respectively. The density correction had a significant effect on the carbon dioxide flux calculation, which was reduced by 7.87% after density correction. Comprehensive quality evaluation results revealed that the ratios of high quality data (grades 1~3) of momentum flux, sensible heat flux, latent heat flux, and carbon dioxide flux were 90.29%, 90.22%, 88.46%, and 85.41%, respectively. Footprint analysis showed that 72.04% source area of the flux was scattered in the first interesting area (10~80°, the underlying surface is the ocean surface with an average water depth of more than 10 m). Comparison of flux calculation results between EddyPro and EasyFlux showed that the two flux time series were fundamentally consistent; the results obtained by EddyPro were smaller but more reliable and accurate due to more strict despiking adopted to get rid of outliers’ impacts.

Key words: Yongxing Island observation tower, eddy-convariance, air-sea flux, data processing, data quality evaluation

中图分类号:

P413

周峰华, 张荣望, 石睿, 何云开, 陈举, 王东晓, 谢强. 永兴岛涡动相关数据处理与质量评价*[J]. 热带海洋学报, 2017, 36(4): 48-59.

Fenghua ZHOU, Rongwang ZHANG, Rui SHI, Yunkai HE, Ju CHEN, Dongxiao WANG, Qiang XIE. A study of data processing and quality assessment of the eddy convariance system off Yongxing Island[J]. Journal of Tropical Oceanography, 2017, 36(4): 48-59.

图/表 20

图1

表1

图2

图3

图4

图5

图6

图7

图8

图9

表2

表3

图10

表4

图11

图12

图13

图14

图15

图16

参考文献 20

[1]	高志球, 马耀明, 王介民, 等, 2000. 南沙群岛海域近海面粗糙度、中性曳力系数及总体交换系数研究[J]. 热带海洋, 19(1): 38-43.
	GAO ZHIQIU, MA YAOMING, WANG JIEMIN, et al, 2000. Studies on roughness lengths, neutral drag coefficients and bulk transfer coefficients over Nansha Islands sea area[J]. Tropic Oceanology, 19(1): 38-43 (in Chinese with English abstract).
[2]	柳媛普, 李锁锁, 吕世华, 等, 2013. 几种通量资料修正方法的比较[J]. 高原气象, 32(6): 1704-1711.
	LIU YUANPU, LI SUOSUO, LÜ SHIHUA, et al, 2013. Comparison of flux correction methods for eddy-covariance measurement[J]. Plateau Meteorology, 32(6): 1704-1711 (in Chinese with English abstract).
[3]	马小红, 苏永红, 鱼腾飞, 等, 2015. 荒漠河岸胡杨林生态系统涡度相关通量数据处理与质量控制方法研究[J]. 干旱区地理, 38(3): 626-635.
	MA XIAOHONG, SU YONGHONG, YU TENGFEI, et al, 2015. Data processing and quality control of eddy covariance in desert riparian forest[J]. Arid Land Geography, 38(3): 626-635 (in Chinese with English abstract).
[4]	马耀明, 王介民, 张庆荣, 等, 1997. 南沙海域近海层大气湍流结构及输送特征研究[J]. 大气科学, 21(3): 357-365.
	MA YAOMING, WANG JIEMIN, ZHANG QINGRONG, et al, 1997. The study of the characteristics of both the atmospheric turbulence structure and the transfer in the lower layer of the atmosphere above the Nansha Islands area[J]. Scientia Atmospherica Sinica, 21(3): 357-365 (in Chinese with English abstract).
[5]	王介民, (2012-02-12)[2016-11-25]. 涡动相关通量观测指导手册[Z/OL]. .
[6]	闫俊岳, 唐志毅, 姚华栋, 等, 2005. 2002年南海季风爆发前后西沙海区海-气通量交换及其变化[J]. 地球物理学报, 48(5): 1000-1010.
	YAN JUNYUE, TANG ZHIYI, YAO HUADONG, et al, 2005. Air-sea flux exchange and variation over the Xisha sea area before and after the onset of southwest monsoon in 2002[J]. Chinese Journal of Geophysics, 48(5): 1000-1010 (in Chinese with English abstract).
[7]	赵中阔, 廖菲, 刘春霞, 等, 2011. 近岸海洋气象平台涡动相关数据处理与质量控制[J]. 地球科学进展, 26(9): 954-964.
	ZHAO ZHONGKUO, LIAO FEI, LIU CHUNXIA, et al, 2011. Processing and quality control of eddy covariance measurements from a coastal marine meteorological platform[J]. Advances in Earth Science, 26(9): 954-964 (in Chinese with English abstract).
[8]	周峰华, 龙小敏, 王盛安, 等, 2013. 南海北部水文气象实时观测网[J]. 海洋技术, 32(4): 67-71.
	ZHOU FENGHUA, LONG XIAOMIN, WANG SHENG’AN, et al, 2013. Real-time hydro-meteorological observation network covering the northern South China Sea[J]. Ocean Technology, 32(4): 67-71 (in Chinese with English abstract).
[9]	庄金鑫, 王维真, 王介民, 2013. 涡动相关通量计算及三种主要软件的比较分析[J]. 高原气象, 32(1): 78-87.
	ZHUANG JINXIN, WANG WEIZHEN, WANG JIEMIN, 2013. Flux calculation of Eddy-Covariance method and comparison of three main softwares[J]. Plateau Meteorology, 32(1): 78-87 (in Chinese with English abstract).
[10]	FOKEN T, GÖOCKEDE M, MAUDER M, et al, 2004. Post-field data quality control[M]//LEE X, MASSMAN W, LAW B. Handbook of micrometeorology: a guide for surface flux measurement and analysis. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic: 81-108.
[11]	FOKEN T, GÖOCKEDE M, MAUDER M, et al, 2004. Post-field data quality control[M]//LEE X, MASSMAN W, LAW B. Handbook of micrometeorology: a guide for surface flux measurement and analysis. Netherlands: Springer: 181-208.
[12]	KAIMAL J C, HAUGEN D A, 1969. Some errors in the measurements of Reynolds stress[J]. Journal of Applied meteorology and Climatology, 8:460-462.
[13]	KAIMAL J C, FINNIGAN J J, 1994. Atmospheric boundary layer flows: Their structure and measurement[M]. Oxford: Oxford University Press: 256-261.
[14]	KLJUN N, CALANCA P, ROTACH M W, et al, 2004. A simple parameterisation for flux footprint predictions[J]. Boundary-Layer Meteorology, 112(3): 503-523.
[15]	MONCRIEFF J B, MASSHEDER J M, DE BRUIN H, et al, 1997. A system to measure surface fluxes of momentum, sensible heat, water vapour and carbon dioxide[J]. Journal of Hydrology, 188-189: 589-611.
[16]	MONCRIEFF J, CLEMENT R, FINNIGAN J, et al, 2004. Averaging, detrending, and filtering of eddy covariance time series[M]//LEE X, MASSMAN W, LAW B. Handbook of micrometeorology: a guide for surface flux measurement and analysis. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic: 7-31.
[17]	VICKERS D, MAHRT L, 1997. Quality control and flux sampling problems for tower and aircraft data[J]. Journal of Atmospheric and Oceanic Technology, 14(3): 512-526.
[18]	WANG DONGXIAO, LIU QINYAN, HUANG RUIXIN, et al, 2006. Interannual variability of the South China Sea throughflow inferred from wind data and an ocean data assimilation product[J]. Geophysical Research Letters, 33(14): L14605.
[19]	WEBB E K, PEARMAN G I, LEUNING R, 1980. Correction of flux measurements for density effects due to heat and water vapour transfer[J]. Quarterly Journal of the Royal Meteorological Society, 106(447): 85-100.
[20]	WILCZAK J M, ONCLEY S P, STAGE S A, 2001. Sonic anemometer tilt correction algorithms[J]. Boundary-Layer Meteorology, 99(1): 127-150.

设备(型号)	采样频率/Hz	数据表间隔/min	观测项目	安装高度/m
风速传感器(Young 05106)	1	1、10、30	4层风速风向	5、10、15、20
温湿度传感器(Vaisala HMP155A) Vaisala HMP155A	1	1、10、30	4层温湿度	5、10、15、20
四分量辐射仪(Hukseflux NR01)	1	1、10、30	向上、向下; 短波和长波辐射	8
海表红外温度计(CSI SI-111)	1	1、10、30	下垫面海表温度	10
涡动相关仪(CSAT3 & EC150)	10	30	感热、潜热、动量、二氧化碳通量	12

质量等级	IST/%
1	0~15
2	16~30
3	31~50
4	51~75
5	76~100
6	101~250
7	251~500
8	501~1000
9	>1000

质量等级	ITC/%
1	0~15
2	16~30
3	31~50
4	51~75
5	76~100
6	101~250
7	251~500
8	501~1000
9	>1000

等级	IST/%	ITC/%
1	0~15	0~30
2	16~30	0~30
3	0~30	31~75
4	31~75	0~30
5	0~75	31~100
6	76~100	0~100
7	0~250	0~250
8	0~1000	0~1000
9	>1000	>1000

永兴岛涡动相关数据处理与质量评价*

A study of data processing and quality assessment of the eddy convariance system off Yongxing Island

RichHTML

PDF (PC)

赞

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

图/表 20

参考文献 20

相关文章 15

Metrics

本文评价

推荐阅读 0

[1]	李骏旻, 李博, 陈武阳, 刘军亮. 三亚近岸海浪观测特征及其对台风过程的响应[J]. 热带海洋学报, 2023, 42(4): 25-35.
[2]	曾毅港, 经志友, 黄小龙, 郑瑞玺. 夏季南海北部粤东陆架锋面的动力特征分析^*[J]. 热带海洋学报, 2022, 41(4): 136-145.
[3]	杨绍琼, 成丹, 陈光耀, 罗辰奕, 牛文栋, 马伟, 法帅. 面向典型海洋现象观测的水下滑翔机应用综述[J]. 热带海洋学报, 2022, 41(3): 54-74.
[4]	聂旺琛, 王喜冬, 陈志强, 何子康, 范开桂. 基于神经网络的全球三维温盐场重构技术研究[J]. 热带海洋学报, 2022, 41(2): 1-15.
[5]	徐常三, 宋翔洲, 齐义泉. 不同边界层稳定性下海气湍流热通量日变化的前沿问题探讨[J]. 热带海洋学报, 2021, 40(3): 57-68.
[6]	蔡树群, 牛建伟, 何映晖, 陈学彬, 张永康, 许洁馨, 陈植武, 林世柽, 谢皆烁. 基于海上风电场构建海洋水文同步实时现场观测系统的思考[J]. 热带海洋学报, 2021, 40(3): 96-102.
[7]	王丽芳, 黄韬, 杜川军, 郭香会. 不同海水营养盐现场连续观测系统的比较研究^*[J]. 热带海洋学报, 2021, 40(3): 103-113.
[8]	杜岩, 陈举, 经志友, 王祥鹏, 陈更新, 徐驰, 储小青, 陈植武, 徐杰, 施震, 唐世林, 何云开, 梁韵, 施平. 南海开放共享航次关键科学问题的思考——从多尺度海洋动力学角度出发[J]. 热带海洋学报, 2020, 39(6): 1-17.
[9]	王桂芬, 徐文龙, 周雯, 许占堂, 曹文熙. 基于船载走航观测高光谱颗粒物吸收系数反演浮游植物粒级结构*[J]. 热带海洋学报, 2018, 37(5): 50-61.
[10]	孙兆华, 曹文熙, 黄健龙, 周璇, 李晓伟, 邹国旺. 走航式海洋观测平台设计及其初步应用^*[J]. 热带海洋学报, 2018, 37(5): 13-19.
[11]	杨蜀冀, 韦成龙, 伍忠良, 刘协来, 杨册, 王聪. 双船双方位角地震探测技术方法及应用效果[J]. 热带海洋学报, 2018, 37(1): 98-104.
[12]	张为彪，钟辉，郑洁，夏弋峻，邹清文. 珠江口盆地(东部)探明储量影响因素及发展趋势[J]. 热带海洋学报, 2017, 36(3): 20-33.
[13]	王洁, 段自强, 姚小红, 高会旺. 西北太平洋船载海面风速脉动资料校正及湍流特征分析^*[J]. 热带海洋学报, 2013, 32(3): 9-15.
[14]	李健,陈荣裕,王盛安,毛华斌,何云开,隋丹丹,谢强,施平,杨跃忠,王东晓. 国际海洋观测技术发展趋势与中国深海台站建设实践[J]. 热带海洋学报, 2012, 31(2): 123-133.
[15]	刘凯,孙照渤,杜岩. 基于INSTANT数据对ITF流出海峡海流的功率谱分析[J]. 热带海洋学报, 2011, 30(6): 1-9.