Marine biology

Study on spatiotemporal distribution of intertidal benthic macro-algae and their diversity in southern Zhejiang Province

Expand
  • Zhejiang Mariculture Research Institute, Zhejiang Key Laboratory of Exploitation and Preservation of Coastal Bio-resource, Wenzhou 325005, China
彭欣(1979—), 男, 江西省新余市人, 助理研究员, 硕士, 主要从事海洋生态和资源环境等方面的研究。E-mail: pengxin_1128@163.com

Received date: 2009-08-18

  Revised date: 2009-09-03

  Online published: 2010-05-24

Supported by

浙江省908专项(ZJ908-01-03); 国家科技支撑计划课题(2007BAD43B02); 浙江省科技厅创新团队建设与人才培养(2009F20009)

Abstract

The authors investigated the spatiotemporal distribution of intertidal benthic macro-algae and their diversity in 10 sections of southern Zhejiang province in autumn 2006 and spring 2007. The results showed that 61 species of benthic macro-algae were collected, including eight Chlorophyta, 16 Phaeophyta, 36 Rhodophyta and one Cyanophyta. Flora characteristic of the benthic alga distribution was very obvious in the inter-tide of southern Zhejiang, and it also changed obviously with seasons in species composition and biomass of benthic algae. More species were found in spring (53 species) than in autumn (25 species), among which only 17 species existed in both of these two seasons. The average biomass of intertidal benthic marco-algae was 540.16g•m-2 in southern Zhejiang, and there was more biomass in spring (722.18g•m-2) than in autumn (358.14g•m-2). As for the vertical distribution of biomass, it was also different in the 10 sections during the two seasons. In autumn, the biomass of intertidal benthic marco-algae was in the order of low intertidal zone (739.45g•m-2)> middle intertidal zone (334.95g•m-2)> high intertidal zone (0g•m-2); in spring it was sequenced as middle intertidal zone (1 943.30g•m-2)> low intertidal (965.03g•m-2) > high intertidal zone (290.41g•m-2). There was something in common for the dominant species in the two seasons in terms of dominance, but their functions in the community changed greatly with seasons. For example, Sargassum thunbergii (Mert.) O. Kuntze was the first dominant species in spring, but it was the second in autumn. The averages of Shannon-winner index, Margalef’s species richness index and Pielou’s evenness index were 1.38±0.66, 0.70±0.38 and 0.93±0.41 in autumn, and 1.65±1.09, 1.07±0.63, 0.80±0.38 in spring, respectively. There was great difference in diversity of benthic marco-algae among sections, which was related to the stability and complexity of benthic marco-algae in southern Zhejiang, as certified by the cluster analysis.

Cite this article

PENG Xin,XIE Qi-lang,LI Shang-lu,CHEN Shao-bo,QIU Jian-biao,ZHOU Zhi-ming . Study on spatiotemporal distribution of intertidal benthic macro-algae and their diversity in southern Zhejiang Province[J]. Journal of Tropical Oceanography, 2010 , 29(3) : 135 -140 . DOI: 10.11978/j.issn.1009-5470.2010.03.135

References

[1] 庄树宏, 陈礼学, 孙力. 南长山岛岩岸潮间带底栖藻类群落结构的季节变化格局[J]. 海洋科学进展, 2003, 21(2): 194-202.
[2] 刘剑华, 张耀红. 沐官岛潮间带底栖海藻春秋季节的群落构成、生物量、分布及其变化的初步研究[J]. 海洋湖沼通报, 1995(1): 80-86.
[3] 阮积惠. 渔山列岛潮间带底栖海藻生态的初步研究[J]. 东海海洋, 1994, 12(4): 48-57.
[4] 敖成齐, 周宗雷, 徐福珍, 等. 浙江温州地区的海产大型藻类[J]. 国土与自然资源研究, 2006, 3: 84-86.
[5] 周宏, 杨万喜. 嵊泗列岛岩相潮间带底栖海藻种类组成及区系特点[J]. 海洋湖沼通报, 2001(2), 35-40.
[6] 庄树宏, 陈礼学. 烟台月亮湾岩岸潮间带底栖海藻群落结构的季节变化[J]. 青岛海洋大学学报:自然科学版, 2003, 33(5): 719-726.
[7] 邵魁双, 李熙宜. 大连海区潮间带底栖海藻生物群落的季节变化[J]. 大连水产学院学报, 2001, 15(1): 29-34.
[8] 庄树宏, 陈礼学, 王尊清. 长山列岛南部三岛岩相潮间 带群落多样性格局[J]. 应用生态学报, 2003, 14(5): 747-752.
[9] 国家海洋局. 海洋调查规范——海洋生物调查[M]. 北京: 海洋出版社, 2007.
[10] 安传光, 赵云龙, 林凌. 崇明岛潮间带夏季大型底栖动物多样性[J]. 生态学报, 2008, 28(2): 577-586.
[11] 厉红梅, 蔡立哲, 林丽珠. 深圳湾潮间带底栖动物群落结构的等级聚类与非度量多维标度排序[J]. 厦门大学学报:自然科学版, 2001, 40(3): 735-740.
[12] 庄树宏, 陈礼学, 孙力. 龙须岛浪蚀花岗岩潮间带大型底栖藻类群落的季节变化模式[J]. 海洋科学, 2004, 28(8): 47-53.
[13] 梅俊学, 候旭光. 威海市区沿岸潮间带海藻季节变化的观察研究[J]. 海洋湖沼通报, 1998(3): 51-56.
[14] 孙建璋, 朱植丰, 杭金欣. 七星岛底栖海藻的初步调查[J]. 浙江水产学院学报, 1995, 14(4): 275-282.
 

Outlines

/