热带海洋学报 ›› 2010, Vol. 29 ›› Issue (1): 46-50.doi: 10.11978/j.issn.1009-5470.2010.01.046cstr: 32234.14.j.issn.1009-5470.2010.01.046

• 海洋化学 • 上一篇    下一篇

珠江口及其以东近海海域表层海水中三氟乙酸的初步研究

王巧云1,3, 丁翔1,2, 王新明1   

  1. 1. 中国科学院广州地球化学研究所有机地球化学国家重点实验室, 广东 广州 510640; 2. 中国科学院珠江三角洲环境污染与控制研究中心, 广东 广州 510640; 3. 中国科学院研究生院, 北京 100049
  • 收稿日期:2008-11-29 修回日期:2008-12-25 出版日期:2010-01-15 发布日期:2001-01-08
  • 作者简介:王新明, 主要从事有机污染物(特别是大气挥发有机物)相关的大气环境、大气化学和健康影响研究。
  • 基金资助:

    国家自然科学基金(40821003); NSFC−广东联合基金(U0833003); GIG领域前沿项目(GIGCX-08-07)

Preliminary study of trifluoroacetic acid in surface waters of the Pearl River Estuary and neighboring eastern offshore sea area

WANG Qiao-Yun1, 3, DING Xiang1, 2, WANG Xin-Ming1   

  1. 1. State Key Laboratory of Organic Geochemistry, Guangzhou Institute of Geochemistry, CAS, Guangzhou 510640, China; 2. Pearl River Delta Research Center of Environmental Pollution and Control, CAS, Guangzhou 510640, China; 3. Graduate University of CAS, Beijing 100049, China
  • Received:2008-11-29 Revised:2008-12-25 Online:2010-01-15 Published:2001-01-08

摘要:

采用衍生化处理和气相色谱-质谱联用分析方法, 测定了珠江口及其以东近海海域表层海水中的三氟乙酸(Trifluoroacetic acid, TFA)含量。珠江口及其以东近岸的红海湾和大亚湾海区TFA浓度范围分别为113—170ng.L–1和202—336ng.L–1。红海湾内海水中TFA的平均水平(279ng.L–1)明显高于外海海水(210ng.L–1), 说明港湾内或其周边地区可能有TFA的点源输入。此外, 外海海水中TFA平均浓度比珠江口高69.1ng.L–1, 表明这种亲水性强、稳定性高的化合物除了已知的人为来源外, 可能还存在未知的人为源或自然源, 使得海洋作为其最终的汇浓度不断累积。

关键词: 三氟乙酸, 珠江口, 海水

Abstract:

Trifluoroacetic acid (TFA) levels in surface waters of the Pearl River Estuary and neighboring eastern offshore sea area were determined by Gas Chromatography-Mass Spectrometry after derivatization process. TFA levels in surface water ranged from 113 to 170ng.L–1 in the Pearl River Estuary and from 202 to 336ng.L–1 in neighboring Daya Bay and Honghai Bay. The average TFA concentration in coastal waters of the Honghai Bay was 279ng.L–1, which was much higher than that in the water samples from the open sea (210ng.L–1), suggesting possible source input within or around the Honghai Bay. The average TFA level in surface waters of open sea was 69.1ng.L–1 higher than that in surface waters of the Pearl River Estuary, indicating unknown anthropogenic or natural sources leading to accumulation in the ocean as final sink of this strongly hydrophilic and fully persistent chemical.