华南不同类型热带风暴驱动下珠江口表层悬沙分布趋势

doi:10.11978/2018092

热带海洋学报 ›› 2019, Vol. 38 ›› Issue (3): 22-31.doi: 10.11978/2018092CSTR: 32234.14.2018092

华南不同类型热带风暴驱动下珠江口表层悬沙分布趋势

欧素英^1,²()

^1. 中山大学海洋工程与技术学院河口海岸研究所, 广东广州510275
^2. 河口水利技术国家地方联合工程实验室, 广东广州510275

收稿日期:2018-09-10 修回日期:2018-12-20 出版日期:2019-05-20 发布日期:2019-06-17
通讯作者: 欧素英
作者简介:欧素英(1974—), 女, 湖南省祁阳县人, 博士, 主要从事河口海岸水文、动力、沉积过程研究。E-mail: ousuying@mail.sysu.edu.cn
基金资助:
国家自然科学基金(41106015);国家重点研发计划项目(2016YFC0402600)

Surface suspended sediment distribution of Pearl River estuary under tropical storms with different wind and river discharge forcing

Suying OU^1,²()

^1. Institute of Estuarine and Coastal Research, School of Marine Engineering and Technology, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou 510275, China
^2. State-Province Joint Engineering Laboratory of Estuarine Hydraulic Technology, Guangzhou 510275, Chinas

Received:2018-09-10 Revised:2018-12-20 Online:2019-05-20 Published:2019-06-17
Contact: Suying OU
Supported by:
National Natural Science Foundation of China(41106015);National Key Research and Development Program of China(2016YFC0402600)

摘要/Abstract

摘要：

本文利用1949—2014年的华南热带风暴数据和1960—2014年珠江入海流量等, 统计分析风暴作用期间珠江口的风强迫和珠江入海水沙强迫特征, 结果表明, 热带风暴对珠江口的风强迫和水沙强迫因台风距珠江口的距离、强度等因素的影响有显著差异。依据水沙及风强迫的强度, 将热带风暴对珠江口的影响简单分成四类: 中风中水沙驱动型、中风高水沙驱动型、强风中水沙驱动型及强风高水沙驱动型。利用MODIS (moderate-resolution imaging spectroradiometer)一级数据和已建立的珠江口表层悬沙指数反演模型, 挑选2002—2010年风暴影响期间无云天气的MODIS影像, 反演珠江口悬沙分布, 分析表层悬沙对四种不同来水来沙及风强迫型风暴的响应特征。结果显示, 中风中水沙型风暴驱动下, 珠江口整体含沙量偏低, 其悬沙扩散及时间变化受控于潮流的强弱; 中风高水沙型风暴驱动下, 八大口门特别是磨刀门浅滩、伶仃洋西滩的含沙量高于其他海域, 其高含沙水体向南偏西方向扩散输运; 强风中水沙风暴驱动下, 河口表层悬沙分布及扩散受主导风向的影响, 在强东北风驱动下, 伶仃洋西侧浅滩含沙量因台风浪的掀沙作用高于湾内大部分海域, 高含沙水体向西南侧扩散; 强风高水沙风暴驱动下珠江河口湾含沙量偏高, 水体一片浑浊, 河口悬沙随偏南风驱动下的沿岸流向东侧输运、扩散。

关键词: 悬沙分布, 热带风暴, 径流, 风强迫, MODIS, 珠江口

Abstract:

In this study, the data of tropical storms, CFSR gridded wind during 1949~2014, and Pearl River discharge were used to analyze wind forcing and runoff forcing on the Pearl River estuary (PRE) under tropical storm. The results show that the wind and runoff forcing varied with location and strength of the storm, and can be classified into four types: storm I with medium wind and runoff forcing on PRE, storm II with medium wind and high runoff forcing, storm III with strong wind and medium wind, and storm IV with strong wind and high runoff forcing. According to the selected moderate-resolution imaging spectroradiometer (MODIS) imaging with fine and no cloudy during tropical storms in South China, existing empirical formula between the water reflectance of MODIS band 1 and suspended sediment concentration (SSC) was used to retrieve the surface SSC in the PRE during storms, and the corresponding spatial diffusion of SSC was studied. We find that under four types of storms with different wind and runoff forcing, the responses of SSC in the PRE were different. The SSC was low under storm I, and suspended sediment diffusion was mostly controlled by tidal current. Under storm II, the higher SSC was shown in the Modaomen Estuary shoal and Lingdingyang west shoal than the other areas, which was mostly transported southwesterly. Under storm III, the distribution and diffusion of suspended sediment were influenced by the dominant storm wind, so that under strong NE wind, Lingdingyang west shoal sediment was resuspended by relatively larger waves for the largest wind fetch in the Lingdingyang estuary, higher SSC was presented and transported to the southwest under longshore current. The response of the PRE to storm IV was that the water body was muddy and the SSC was high in the whole PRE than under normal condition; and under southerly storm wind, the high SSC was diffused to the east

Key words: suspended sediment distribution, tropical storm, river discharge, wind forcing, MODIS, Pearl River estuary

中图分类号:

P333.4

欧素英. 华南不同类型热带风暴驱动下珠江口表层悬沙分布趋势[J]. 热带海洋学报, 2019, 38(3): 22-31.

Suying OU. Surface suspended sediment distribution of Pearl River estuary under tropical storms with different wind and river discharge forcing[J]. Journal of Tropical Oceanography, 2019, 38(3): 22-31.

图/表 10

图1

图2

图3

图4

表1

图5

图6

图7

图8

图9

参考文献 18

[1]	杨干然, 陈良圭 , 1987. 妈湾港的波浪特征与台风浪推算[J]. 热带海洋, 6(1):66-72.
	YANG GANRAN, CHEN LIANGGUI , 1987. Wave characteristics and calculation of typhoon wave in Mawan harbour[J]. Tropic Oceanology, 6(1):66-72 (in Chinese with English abstract).
[2]	朱樊, 欧素英, 张铄涵 , 等, 2015. 基于MODIS影像的珠江口表层悬沙浓度反演及时空变化分析[J]. 泥沙研究, ( 2):67-73. doi: 10.16239/j.cnki.0468-155x.2015.02.011
	ZHU FAN, OU SUYING, ZHANG SHUOHAN , et al, 2015. MODIS images-based retrieval and analysis of spatial-temporal change of superficial suspended sediment concentration in the Pearl River Estuary[J]. Journal of Sediment Research, ( 2):67-73 (in Chinese with English abstract). doi: 10.16239/j.cnki.0468-155x.2015.02.011
[3]	CHEN SHUISEN, HUANG WENRUI, WANG HONGQING , et al, 2009. Remote sensing assessment of sediment re-suspension during hurricane Frances in Apalachicola Bay, USA[J]. Remote Sensing of Environment, 113(12):2670-2681. doi: 10.1016/j.rse.2009.08.005
[4]	GONG WENPING, SHEN JIAN, REAY W G , 2007. The hydrodynamic response of the York River estuary to Tropical Cyclone Isabel, 2003[J]. Estuarine, Coastal and Shelf Science, 73(3-4):695-710. doi: 10.1016/j.ecss.2007.03.012
[5]	GONG WENPING, SHEN JIAN , 2009. Response of sediment dynamics in the York River Estuary, USA to Tropical Cyclone Isabel of 2003[J]. Estuarine, Coastal and Shelf Science, 84(1):61-74. doi: 10.1016/j.ecss.2009.06.004
[6]	LAHET F, STRAMSKI D , 2010. MODIS imagery of turbid plumes in San Diego coastal waters during rainstorm events[J]. Remote Sensing of Environment, 114(2):332-344. doi: 10.1016/j.rse.2009.09.017
[7]	LIHAN T, SAITOH S I, IIDA T , et al, 2008. Satellite-measured temporal and spatial variability of the Tokachi River plume[J]. Estuarine, Coastal and Shelf Science, 78(2):237-249. doi: 10.1016/j.ecss.2007.12.001
[8]	MOLLERI G S F, DE M NOVO E M L, KAMPEL M , 2010. Space-time variability of the Amazon River plume based on satellite ocean color[J]. Continental Shelf Research, 30(3-4):342-352. doi: 10.1016/j.csr.2009.11.015
[9]	MOREIRA D, SIMIONATO C G, GOHIN F , et al, 2013. Suspended matter mean distribution and seasonal cycle in the Río de La Plata estuary and the adjacent shelf from ocean color satellite (MODIS) and in-situ observations[J]. Continental Shelf Research, 68:51-66. doi: 10.1016/j.csr.2013.08.015
[10]	NAUDIN J J, CAUWET G, CHRÉTIENNOT-DINET M J , et al, 1997. River discharge and wind influence upon particulate transfer at the land-ocean interaction: case study of the Rhone River plume[J]. Estuarine, Coastal and Shelf Science, 45(3):303-316. doi: 10.1006/ecss.1996.0190
[11]	OU SUYING, ZHANG HONG, WANG DONGXIAO , 2009. Dynamics of the buoyant plume off the Pearl River Estuary in summer[J]. Environmental Fluid Mechanics, 9(5):471-492, doi: 10.1007/s10652-009-9146-3. doi: 10.1007/s10652-009-9146-3
[12]	PAWLOWICZ R, BEARDSLEY B, LENTZ S , 2002. Classical tidal harmonic analysis including error estimates in MATLAB using T_TIDE[J]. Computers & Geosciences, 28(8):929-937.
[13]	PETUS C, MARIEU V, NOVOA S , et al, 2014. Monitoring spatio-temporal variability of the Adour River turbid plume (Bay of Biscay, France) with MODIS 250-m imagery[J]. Continental Shelf Research, 74:35-49. doi: 10.1016/j.csr.2013.11.011
[14]	SHI WEI, WANG MENGHUA , 2010. Satellite observations of the seasonal sediment plume in central East China Sea[J]. Journal of Marine Systems, 82(4):280-285. doi: 10.1016/j.jmarsys.2010.06.002
[15]	THOMAS A C, WEATHERBEE R A , 2006. Satellite-measured temporal variability of the Columbia River plume[J]. Remote Sensing of Environment, 100(2):167-178. doi: 10.1016/j.rse.2005.10.018
[16]	WALKER N D , 1996. Satellite assessment of Mississippi River plume variability: causes and predictability[J]. Remote Sensing of Environment, 58(1):21-35. doi: 10.1016/0034-4257(95)00259-6
[17]	WREN P A, LEONARD L A , 2005. Sediment transport on the mid-continental shelf in Onslow Bay, North Carolina during hurricane Isabel[J]. Estuarine, Coastal and Shelf Science, 63(1-2):43-56. doi: 10.1016/j.ecss.2004.10.018
[18]	YING MING, ZHANG WEI, YU HUI , et al, 2014. An overview of the China meteorological administration tropical cyclone database[J]. Journal of Atmospheric and Oceanic Technology, 31(2):287-301, doi: 10.1175/JTECH-D-12-00119.1. doi: 10.1175/JTECH-D-12-00119.1

影像日期	风暴名	潮汐	水沙强迫类型	主导风		珠江入海最大流量/(m³·s^-1)
影像日期	风暴名	潮汐	水沙强迫类型	最大风速/(m·s^-1)	风向	珠江入海最大流量/(m³·s^-1)
2005-08-03	天鹰	落潮	Ⅰ	9.3	E	9262
2006-08-14	宝霞	涨潮	Ⅱ	8.9	ENE	39600
2006-05-14	珍珠	落潮	Ⅲ	20.8	ENE	14600
2006-07-21	碧利斯	落潮	Ⅳ	16.5	SSW	57100
2008-06-20	风神	落潮	Ⅳ	14.2	SSW	57600

华南不同类型热带风暴驱动下珠江口表层悬沙分布趋势

Surface suspended sediment distribution of Pearl River estuary under tropical storms with different wind and river discharge forcing

RichHTML

PDF (PC)

赞

可视化

被引次数

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

图/表 10

参考文献 18

相关文章 15

Metrics

本文评价

推荐阅读 0

[1]	王钰, 胡晨悦, 丘仲锋, 赵冬至, 吴到懋, 廖廓. 基于云特性的多源卫星日间海雾探测技术研究^*[J]. 热带海洋学报, 2023, 42(6): 15-28.
[2]	宋星宇, 林雅君, 张良奎, 向晨晖, 黄亚东, 郑传阳. 粤港澳大湾区近海中小型浮游动物分布特征及影响因素^*[J]. 热带海洋学报, 2023, 42(3): 136-148.
[3]	赵中贤, 孙珍, 毛云华, 张伙带. 南海北部陆缘不均匀伸展及脉动式构造升降史^*[J]. 热带海洋学报, 2023, 42(3): 96-115.
[4]	付成冲, 李福宇, 陈丹丹, 侯敬, 王珺, 李元超, 王道儒, 王嫣. 海南岛岸礁澄黄滨珊瑚(Porites lutea)集合种群的遗传结构和连通性[J]. 热带海洋学报, 2023, 42(2): 64-77.
[5]	高娜, 赵明利, 马毅, 徐婉明, 詹海刚, 蔡树群. 台风对珠江口风暴增水的影响分析[J]. 热带海洋学报, 2023, 42(1): 32-42.
[6]	唐灵, 聂宇华, 王平, 汤超莲. 1974—2020年珠江口外海海洋热浪变化趋势分析[J]. 热带海洋学报, 2022, 41(6): 143-150.
[7]	商博文, 吴云超, 江志坚, 刘松林, 黄小平. 珠江口沉积物有机质特征、来源及其对碳存储的意义[J]. 热带海洋学报, 2022, 41(3): 16-28.
[8]	尹天齐, 王庆, 杨宇峰, 岑竞仪. 基于形态学和DNA分子鉴定的珠江口浮游动物群落结构比较研究[J]. 热带海洋学报, 2022, 41(3): 172-185.
[9]	陈琼, 唐世林, 吴颉. 基于GF-4卫星反演的珠江口水体表层悬浮泥沙时空变化特征*[J]. 热带海洋学报, 2022, 41(2): 65-76.
[10]	帅义萍, 陈寅超, 刘子嘉, 葛在名, 马梦真, 张苑芳, 李芊. 2016年春季季风转换期的珠江冲淡水分布与生态特征分析^*[J]. 热带海洋学报, 2021, 40(5): 63-71.
[11]	蔡建楠, 刘海龙, 姜波, 陈吟晖, 李杰鸿, 吴思晓, 梁建霞, 黄华, 邢前国. 珠江口河网水体非光学活性水质参数高光谱反演[J]. 热带海洋学报, 2021, 40(1): 58-64.
[12]	苏芯莹, 钟瑜, 李尧, 谭美婷, 黄亚东, 刘珊, 徐向荣, 宋星宇. 珠江口典型海岛周边水域浮游植物分布特征及其影响因素*[J]. 热带海洋学报, 2020, 39(5): 30-42.
[13]	杨碧峰, 熊成, 曹敬贺, 孙金龙, 万奎元, 夏少红. 滑行波震相对珠江口地区壳内低速层的约束作用[J]. 热带海洋学报, 2020, 39(1): 106-119.
[14]	严冬, 宋德海, 鲍献文. 珠江口洪季最大浑浊带的大小潮变化与机制分析^*[J]. 热带海洋学报, 2020, 39(1): 20-35.
[15]	杨威, 董园, 俎婷婷, 刘长建, 修鹏. 南海北部夏季叶绿素a分布规律及影响因素[J]. 热带海洋学报, 2019, 38(6): 9-20.