热带海洋学报

• • 上一篇    下一篇

潟湖型与河口型海草床的群落结构特征、关键环境影响因子及生态系统健康评价研究

杨玉敏1, 李勇1*, 凌娟2, 梁家模1, 黄小芳2, 屈兵1, 周卫国2,董俊德2
  

  1. 1. 广东省生态环境监测中心, 广东 广州 510308;

    2. 热带海洋环境与岛礁生态全国重点实验室(中国科学院南海海洋研究所, 广东 广州 510301


  • 收稿日期:2026-02-12 修回日期:2026-04-28 接受日期:2026-05-13
  • 通讯作者: 李勇
  • 基金资助:
    2024年广东省海洋生态监测项目资助(GDEEMC-2024-25); 中华人民共和国香港特别行政区研究资助局(RGC)策略专题资助计划(STG)资助(STG2/P-604/25R)

Research on Community Structure Characteristics, Key Environmental Influencing Factors, and Health Assessment of Lagoon-Type and Estuarine-Type Seagrass Beds

YANG Yumin1, LI Yong1*, LING Juan2, LIANG Jiamo1, HUANG Xiaofang2, QU Bing1, ZHOU Weiguo2, DONG Junde2   

  1. 1. Guangdong Provincial Ecological Environment Monitoring Center, Guangzhou 510308, China;


    2. State Key Laboratory of Tropical Oceanography (South China Sea Institute of Oceanology, Chinese Academy of Sciences), Guangzhou 510301, China


  • Received:2026-02-12 Revised:2026-04-28 Accepted:2026-05-13
  • Supported by:

     Guangdong Province Marine Ecological Monitoring Project (GDEEMC-2024-25) in 2024, Hong Kong Research Grants Council under the Strategic Topics Grant (STG2/P-604/25R)

摘要: 本研究以广东省潟湖型(湛江流沙湾)与河口型(汕头韩江河口)两类典型海草床为主要研究对象,通过系统调查,阐明了其群落结构特征、关键环境影响因子,并开展了生态系统健康评价。结果表明,调查区域海草均属于喜盐草属(Halophila)。其中,流沙湾海草床由卵叶喜盐草(Halophila ovalis)和小喜盐草(H. minor)组成,前者为优势种;韩江河口海草床仅记录到贝克喜盐草(H. beccarii)。流沙湾海草盖度(57.33%)高于韩江河口(34.22%),但两区域盖度与植株密度均无显著差异。流沙湾海草总生物量(27.36 g/m²)与平均株高(2.41 cm)均显著高于韩江河口(分别为8.07 g/m²与1.88 cm)(P < 0.05)。相关性分析表明,影响两地海草群落结构的关键环境影响因子不同:流沙湾海草群落与茎枝密度、透光率及无机氮呈显著正相关(P < 0.05),韩江河口海草群落则与硫化物和盐度呈显著负相关(P < 0.05)。生态系统健康评价显示,两地海草床均处于亚健康状态。其中,流沙湾在水质、栖息地与生物指标方面表现为亚健康,但沉积环境与生物质量相对较好,主要面临水体富营养化与栖息地退化压力;韩江河口则在水质、栖息地与生物指标上也均为亚健康,但其富营养化程度更高、底质稳定性较差、生物指标衰退更为明显。本研究系统比较了潟湖型与河口型海草床的生态特征与健康状况,揭示了两类生境中的海草床在群落结构、关键环境影响因子及健康压力方面存在明显差异,从而明确了分类保护与精准修复的必要性,为典型潟湖型与河口型生境海草床的生态保护与修复实践提供了科学依据和针对性参考。

关键词: 海草床, 潟湖型与河口型, 群落结构特征, 环境因子, 健康评价

Abstract: This study systematically investigated two typical seagrass beds in Guangdong Province—a lagoon-type bed in Zhanjiang Liusha Bay and an estuarine-type bed in Shantou Hanjiang Estuary—to clarify their community structure characteristics, identify key environmental factors, and evaluate ecosystem health. The results showed that all seagrass species identified belong to the genus Halophila. The Liusha Bay seagrass bed was composed of Halophila ovalis and H. minor, with H. ovalis as the dominant species, while only H. beccarii was recorded in the Hanjiang Estuary. Although seagrass coverage was higher in Liusha Bay (57.33%) than in the Hanjiang Estuary (34.22%), there was no significant difference in coverage or shoot density between the two sites. However, total biomass (27.36 g/m²) and mean shoot height (2.41 cm) in Liusha Bay were significantly greater than those in the Hanjiang Estuary (8.07 g/m² and 1.88 cm, respectively) (P < 0.05). Correlation analysis indicated that the key environmental drivers differed between the two sites: in Liusha Bay, seagrass community structure showed significant positive correlations with shoot density, light transmittance, and inorganic nitrogen (P < 0.05), whereas in the Hanjiang Estuary, it was significantly negatively correlated with sulfide and salinity (P < 0.05). Ecosystem health assessment revealed that both seagrass beds were in a sub-healthy state. Liusha Bay exhibited sub-healthy conditions in water quality, habitat, and biological indicators, but its sediment environment and biological quality were relatively better, with main pressures coming from eutrophication and habitat degradation. In contrast, the Hanjiang Estuary showed sub-healthy conditions across water quality, habitat, and biological indicators, with more pronounced eutrophication, less stable substrate, and greater decline in biological indicators. This study systematically compared the ecological characteristics and health status of lagoon-type and estuarine seagrass beds, revealing significant differences in community structure, environmental influencing factors and health stressors between the seagrass beds in these two habitat types. It highlights the necessity of classified conservation and precision restoration and provides a scientific basis and targeted reference for the ecological conservation and restoration practices of in typical lagoonal and estuarine type seagrass bed ecosystems.

Key words: seagrass bed, lagoon-type and estuarine-types, community structure characteristics, environmental factors, ecosystem health assessment