Journal of Tropical Oceanography ›› 2018, Vol. 37 ›› Issue (6): 63-73.doi: 10.11978/2018007CSTR: 32234.14.2018007

Special Issue: 南海专题

• Marine Geology • Previous Articles     Next Articles

Petrography of carbonate veins in basement basalts from the South China Sea Exp. 349

Jiarui XU1,2(), Yifeng CHEN1(), Baoyun WANG2,3   

  1. 1. CAS Key Laboratory of Ocean and Marginal Sea Geology, Guangzhou Institute of Geochemistry, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Guangzhou 510640, China
    2. University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100049
    3. State Key Laboratory of Isotope Geochemistry, Guangzhou Institute of Geochemistry, Chinese Academy of Sciences Guangzhou 510640, China
  • Received:2018-01-09 Online:2018-11-20 Published:2018-12-24
  • Supported by:
    National Natural Science Foundation of China (91428102, 41876064);IODP China funding for Exp. 349 and 367

Abstract:

The basaltic basement in the South China Sea was cored for the first time during International Ocean Discovery Program (IODP) Exp 349. The basalt was collected from Sites U1431 and U1433 close to the fossil spreading ridge in East and Southwest Sub-basins, respectively. Carbonate veins (n=16) within the basalt were investigated under microscope and by the laser Raman spectra. At Site U1431, the carbonate veins consisted of calcite veins or aragonite veins, while at Site U1433 the carbonate veins are composed of either calcite veins, or aragonite veins, and calcite-aragonite mixed veins. Meanwhile, the calcite veins and aragonites alternated, and at ~42.1 m below basement, two calcite veins and one aragonite vein occurred parallel, likely indicating that multiple hydrothermal fluids of different sources have circulated there. At both sites, the textures of aragonite are generally the same-blocky, fibrous, and radiating fibers. However, it is not the case for calcite. At Site U1431, the calcite is clotted blocky, blocky, granule, and fibrous, while at Site U1433 the calcite only occur as blocks. The abundance of carbonate veins at Site U1431 is much higher than that at Site U1433. These suggest that the low-temperature hydrothermal circulation at Site U1431 is stronger than that at Site U1433. Different local geology and environment mostly lead to the differences in hydrothermal activity at these two sites: Site U1431 is close to a giant seamount that serves as a recharge site, while Site U1433 is far away from any recharge or discharge site.

Key words: carbonate veins, Laser Raman spectra, calcite, aragonite, low temperature hydrothermal fluid flow, South China Sea, IODP Exp349

CLC Number: 

  • P578.6